2012, the year that was: Energy & Environment

So what do you think the big environment stories were for 2012? The carbon tax, right? The Murray-Darling Basin Plan, or the fight over the super trawler? Maybe live cattle exports, perhaps marine parks, shark bites in WA? The Tasmanian Forests Agreement, coal seam gas or – if you look a little further…

Bhm5xt49-1355699103
Tim Donnelly

So what do you think the big environment stories were for 2012? The carbon tax, right? The Murray-Darling Basin Plan, or the fight over the super trawler? Maybe live cattle exports, perhaps marine parks, shark bites in WA? The Tasmanian Forests Agreement, coal seam gas or – if you look a little further afield – Hurricane Sandy?

In fact only one of these makes our list of most-read stories for 2012, an article that explains coal seam gas, shale gas, and how fracking works.

NASA Goddard Photo and Video

The rest of the list casts an interesting light on the environmental and energy issues that most grabbed people this year.

Right up the top, there’s an old favourite: vegetarians have more blood on their hands. It was the most popular story last year, and again this year. And in more “angry about animals” news, Kate Grarock’s “We love to hate the common myna” raised plenty of hackles among suburban bird slayers.

One of the more popular topics was transport. Paul Tranter’s article on “effective speed” – showing how much of your time car commuting takes up, even when you’re not in the vehicle – was fascinating, and justly well-read. Brad Pettit surveyed the widespread economic benefits of bike lanes, some facts a lot of people wanted to share with their friends (and, we suspect, enemies).

absentmindedprof/Flickr

The rise and rise of solar power also took out a few of the top spots. Mike Sandiford asked “Who’s afraid of solar PV?” – the answer, existing power distributors. If you’re interested in energy issues, Mike’s Energy & the Earth blog has produced some incredibly incisive – and spectacularly well-referenced – pieces about what’s going on behind your power bills.

Elsewhere, John Mathews had a “Newsflash: solar power costs are falling below fossil fuels”, reminding us that if you’ve heard solar power is too expensive, you’re being sold a pup.

And of course, there’s climate change scepticism. Nothing unleashes a frenzy of clicking like a discussion of why people believe what they believe about climate change. Michael Brown’s “Straw man climate science” was a how-to guide to shonky climate science, and it pressed everyone’s buttons.

NOAA Photo Library

Popularity is all well and good, but sometimes important things just aren’t that popular. Take recent revelations on Arctic methane release, for example, or the latest figures on Arctic ice melt, or the ever-shrinking likelihood we’ll keep temperature increase below 2 degrees C (or one proposed solution: stop exporting coal). No one likes to hear this sort of stuff, but it matters.

We also had some sterling pieces on electricity prices, an issue that exercised the PM, led to a Senate committee, and may have caused people to read an Energy White Paper that would otherwise have gone unnoticed. (In case you’re wondering what the culprit is for your power bills arcing up, it’s peak power. What to do about it? That’s a whole other question.)

Andrew J Cosgriff
We celebrated the 25th anniversary of the Montreal Protocol, which helped the world tackle ozone-depleting substances, and asked what international climate change negotiations could learn from its success. We investigated the relationship between climate change and drought over a four-part series. And we published CSIRO and the Bureau of Meterology’s landmark work, the State of the Climate 2012, providing a resource for journalists and researchers.

And as the year drew to a close, we kicked off our series on Australia’s critically endangered species. In November, Tim Flannery’s Quarterly Essay proposed some better ways to conserve species – we’ll spend next year proposing some of our own.

In case you’re wondering if it’s all bad news, you’ll be relieved to know there are moments of joy. A search for the secrets behind scribbly gums revealed some entmological treats; researchers are finding ways to turn human waste into human food; Australia passed a law prohibiting the importation of illegally logged timber; studies found more water in the Murray-Darling – even floods – could be good news not just for the environment, but for farmers too, and some brilliant new technology is making animal research less invasive, and bringing more wild cuteness into your home.

Most-read stories for 2012

bJORk(D)mAN/flickr

Sign in to Favourite

Want to follow The Conversation?

Sign up to our free newsletter to get the day's top stories in your inbox each morning, with a special wrap on Saturday.

Spinner
Help evidence based journalism become the norm and donate

Join the conversation

10 Comments sorted by

  1. Peter Ormonde

    Peter Ormonde is a Friend of The Conversation.

    Farmer

    Many thanks Ms Jane - a truly masterful performance of putting stuff together throughout the year - as evidenced above by the above catalogue.

    Not just at the cutting edge - setting the agenda in several areas. It's interesting to see, read and hear where these ideas in the Conversation turn up. It informs the national discussion. Heck maybe it's even kick started one - that might be more like it.

    Very useful thing to do, and you do it most elegantly.

    One thing that would enhance at least some of the articles is a bit of a "further reading" list - a set of links that would allow housebound old codgers to bone up. I know links are often embedded in the text but I'm thinking more of yer scholarly treatise or two. But this is only an attempt to gild the lily.

    report
    1. Felix MacNeill

      Environmental Manager

      In reply to Peter Ormonde

      Peter - couldn't agree more (as a fellow old codger, particularly the 'further reading' list idea) - profound thanks to Jane and all at The Conversation

      report
  2. Paul Moonie

    PhD student, solar energy

    Thoroughly enjoyed all the energy articles over the year - thanks to all authors, editors and contributors.

    Enjoy the rest of your holidays everyone, looking forward to more from the TC in 2013.

    report
  3. Tim Scanlon

    Debunker

    I agree with the other commenters here, thanks to all the authors and editors for their efforts this year, even the authors I disagreed with.

    report
  4. Byron Smith

    PhD candidate in Christian Ethics at University of Edinburgh

    Yes, a massive thank you to Jane and all the authors for providing coverage of these issues unmatched in the Australian scene.

    report
  5. Comment removed by moderator.

  6. Kim Peart

    Researcher & Writer

    Though not the most popular subject and I didn't see it listed, the looming threat of ocean acidification, already dissolving the shells of sea creatures and leading to attempts at private geoengineering off the US west coast, must be pretty significant.

    I find it personally disturbing to read that vast algal blooms in dying oceans could release toxic hydrogen sulphide gas that can kill life on land and destroy the ozone layer.

    With geologists calling for the declaration of a new epoch, the Anthropocene, because so many spaces of life are already being lost and the tragedy is hardly beginning, at what point do we reach a state of emergency and begin serious action to win back a safe planet.

    Knee-jerk reactions, like private geoengineering, do not address the core issues of exactly how we got here, how we could have avoided the nightmare and what we can best do to turn the tide back toward a safe Earth.

    Kim Peart
    http://www.islandearth.com.au/

    report
  7. Comment removed by moderator.

  8. Comment removed by moderator.

  9. Peter Sommerville

    Scientist & Technologist

    The Conversation presents a range of views on many diverse topics. It facilitates comment and debate. It deserves to be congratulated.

    But for me the most significant event for The Conversation during 2012 was the recognition of the manipulation of systems originally intended to provide a ranking of comments based on interest. This was so easily manipulated.

    You have made changes which have effectively controlled that, whilst preserving the original intent. Having played a small part in affecting the changes implemented, I am pleased with the outcome.

    Congratulations on a successful 2012 and wishing for an even more successful 2013🌊

    report