The best team to lift the trophy was Brazil's star-studded 1970 team.
A survey shows that most Puerto Ricans didn't highly rate the official information coming out of the island. With the Institute of Statistics in trouble, the situation is likely not to improve.
Australia has won the soccer World Cup three times, in simulation games only. So what are the challenges to predicting the winner?
The government said 64, journalists said 4,645. What went wrong?
We are often presented with surveys that claim to show how we all think on a certain subject. But how many people do you need to ask for that finding to have have any convincing meaning?
Statistics are political – so we should question the recent drop in government estimates of British citizens living in the EU.
If journal editors fail to retract or properly flag data revealed as inaccurate, they leave open the possibility that it'll be cited for years to come.
A statistical method widely used today by scientists and others is all thanks to a statistician at a Guinness brewery whose work was published anonymously more than a century ago.
The internet has not only changed the kinds of answers historical study can provide, but also what questions can be asked.
The Retail Prices Index (RPI) is responsible for rising rail fares and student loan repayments.
A new approach to gathering data from football matches which uses cybernetics and AI could help coaches spot weak links in their teams.
Comparing crash rates between humans and self-driving cars requires more data than anyone currently collects. And some of it will be quite hard to figure out.
Australian cricket captain Steve Smith's play during the recent Ashes saw him hailed as one of the greatest Australian players. So what do the numbers say?
The squeeze on wealth in the middle class by those at the top is a long established trend in international inequality data. But the ABS doesn't provide this information.
The same-sex marriage postal survey gave Australians a chance to create data for social change. And that's rare.
Not everyone who could vote did vote in the voluntary postal vote on same-sex marriage. So what can we draw from the result if only four out of five eligible Australians took part?
We are observing two new phenomena. On one hand doubt is shed on the quality of entire scientific fields or sub-fields. On the other this doubt is played out in the open, in the media and blogosphere.
Although Puerto Ricans are American citizens, what happens on the island tends to stay there, at least in terms of economic data.
What makes someone more likely to succeed when the lights shine brightest?
Scientists have a big problem: Many psychological studies don't hold up to scrutiny. Is it time to redefine statistical significance?