Australian Twitter News Index: Riots, Marriage, Bestiality

The last couple of weeks of our Australian Twitter News Index have been somewhat underwhelming: overall levels of news sharing on Twitter have been comparatively low, even in spite of a small blip at the tail end of week 37 which was caused by the reporting and commentary which covered the Sydney riots around the Innocence of Muslims film. In terms of total activity, week 38 picks up a little, but still fails to move past the long-term average – and that’s in spite of some notable spikes in the sharing of opinion articles from leading news sites.

ATNIX Week 38: 17-23 Sep. 2012

Overall numbers for this week provide a poor point of comparison, as – due to scheduled server maintenance – most of Friday 21 Sep. is missing from this week’s dataset. Given that this incomplete dataset contains some 108,000 tweets linking to Australian news Websites, and that we would usually expect to see at least another 15,000 such tweets on a Friday, though, we can assume that the total volume for this week would be somewhere upwards of 120,000 tweets – which would be at least a small improvement on the preceding week’s 115,000 tweets linking to news sites. Here’s how they are distributed across the sites we track: the main mover in the leading group is The Age, which surpasses news.com.au by some margin this week, after a virtually dead heat last time around.

ATNIX 38/2012: News Sites http://mappingonlinepublics.net/

The situation for the opinion and commentary sites and sections is particularly interesting this week, as the day-to-day patterns below will also demonstrate. First, the total number of tweets linking to such sites has actually declined a little (from around 17,600 to 16,700), while the Fairfax sites have substantially increased their dominance: the Sydney Morning Herald maintains a remarkable 26% share of all Australian opinion links shared this week (unchanged from the similarly unusual result last week), but The Age now joins it by adding another 17%. This once again pushes it past the long-term runner-up The Conversation, which received roughly the same amount of links as last week, but was clearly outperformed by the substantial spike in The Age shares. There is further shuffling of positions on the minor places (the ABC’s The Drum loses another place, continuing its decline of the past few weeks), but these represent fairly small numbers in the first place.

ATNIX 38/2012: Opinion Sites http://mappingonlinepublics.net/

These patterns are further illustrated by the day-to-day comparisons (ignore the drop in numbers on 21 Sep. due to server maintenance, obviously). Links to the news sites remain below the long-term average, but are generally improved from the previous week; this is especially notable for The Age (in green), which is now well above news.com.au’s purple line. At the same time, there are no obvious spikes in activity – as weeks go, this is a sedate one.

ATNIX 38/2012: News Sites http://mappingonlinepublics.net/

That’s not the case for the opinion and commentary sites and sections, on the other hand: here, Sydney Morning Herald and The Age and both spiking on 17 and 19 September, and even Fairfax’s online-only Brisbane newspaper site Brisbane Times gets a minor spike (by its admittedly modest standards) on 18 September:

ATNIX 38/2012: Opinion Sites http://mappingonlinepublics.net/

For the Sydney Morning Herald, the new week continues a trend which the preceding Sunday’s comparatively more minor spike around a piece by sports commentator Peter FitzSimons about the Sydney riots already foreshadowed: a substantial amount of tweets sharing links to commentary about the Innocence of Muslims film and its aftermath. On the Monday, it’s a more considered argument by Waleed Aly which is shared in more than 700 times.

By Wednesday, however, attention is split between this issue and a new political controversy: while another opinion piece on the Sydney protests, by Mohamad Tabbaa, gains some 140 additional shares, the majority of the 19 Sep. spike is driven by opinion articles which discuss the parliamentary debate about same-sex marriage. National Times-cobadged articles about Liberal Senator Cory Bernardi’s hysterical fear campaign and his subsequent resignation as Opposition Leader Tony Abbott’s personal parliamentary secretary are shared in some 260 tweets, while pieces about NSW Premier Barry O’Farrell’s intention to allow a conscience vote on same-sex marriage in state parliament and Finance Minister Penny Wong’s fight for the recognition of same-sex relationships each added another 100 tweets.

Similar patterns apply at The Age. Waleed Aly’s piece was published here as well, and receives some 375 tweets on Monday, and a (pre-bestiality) Cory Bernardi also enters this debate, if only as a sideline. At the same time, a piece about the erosion of Australian Internet users’ privacy rights through the government’s proposed data retention laws also receives some 150 tweets. Wednesday, on the other hand, is all about Cory Bernardi: articles discussing his contributions to the same-sex marriage debate account for more than half of all Age links shared on Twitter that day.

By contrast, the smaller spike in Brisbane Time_s links on the Tuesday is purely about state matters, incidentally: some 165 tweets linked to a piece by author John Birmingham on what’s wrong with Queensland Premier Campbell Newman. This makes sense in the overall context of the Fairfax setup, with SMH and Age as the national flagships, and the Brisbane Times as a secondary, local platform which syndicates much of its national coverage from those newspapers – so Fairfax readers who are interested in following the national coverage should be expected to be more likely to link to those sites in their tweets than to the Brisbane Times_.

Standard background information: this analysis is based on tracking all tweets which contain links pointing to the URLs of a large selection of leading Australian news and opinion sites. For technical reasons, it does not contain ‘button’ retweets, but manual retweets (“RT @user …”) are included. Datasets for those sites which cover more than just news and opinion (abc.net.au, sbs.com.au, ninemsn.com.au) are filtered to exclude irrelevant sections of those sites (e.g. abc.net.au/tv, catchup.ninemsn.com.au). For our analysis of ‘opinion’ link sharing, we include only those sub-sections of mainstream sites which contain opinion and commentary (e.g. abc.net.au/unleashed, articles on theaustralian.com.au which include ‘/opinion’ in the URL), and compare them with dedicated opinion and commentary sites.

See the posts tagged ‘ATNIX’ at Mapping Online Publics for a full collection of previous results.

Join the conversation

10 Comments sorted by

  1. Tim Mazzarol

    Winthrop Professor, Entrepreneurship, Innovation, Marketing and Strategy at University of Western Australia

    Hi Axel

    Thank's once again for some interesting analytic data on the Twitterverse.

    I found a study by Pear Analytics from a content analysis they did in 2009 of 2,000 tweets in the UK over a two-week period.

    According to this, 4% was news, 4% was spam, 6% was self-promotion, 9% was pass along value, 38% was conversational chatter and 40% was "pointless babble".

    Although I am a big fan of LinkedIn (for professional networking) and Facebook (for social networking), I am not yet able to justify to myself the effort of going on Twitter.

    It seem so much of waste of time and given the misuse and abuse that so much of it has been subject to I am struggling to see its role in the social media mix.

    Perhaps you can enlighten me?

    report
    1. Misha Ketchell

      Managing Editor at The Conversation

      In reply to Tim Mazzarol

      Hi Tim,

      Funny, I hate LinkedIn, which seem to me a self-promoting waste of time, but I often get valuable information from the journalists I follow on twitter. A good clear-eyed guide to the strengths and limitations of twitter is Greg Jerico's book, The Fifth Estate. I'd recommend reading it. It'll confirm your anti-twitter suspicions and also make you think again about what twitter can achieve.

      report
    2. Tim Mazzarol

      Winthrop Professor, Entrepreneurship, Innovation, Marketing and Strategy at University of Western Australia

      In reply to Misha Ketchell

      Hi Misha,

      Well I guess that just reflects that all social media is not the same and that it can be segmented into different media for different purposes. However, I think that calling Twitter a "5th Estate" might be over cooking the duck a bit.

      The concept of "original" journalism was already captured by the Canadian CBC TV news magazine "The Fifth Estate" that has been in action since 1975.

      The notion of crowd sourcing news via Twitter and YouTube seems to be the trend in the recent Arab…

      Read more
    3. Jason Bryce

      logged in via Twitter

      In reply to Tim Mazzarol

      The tone of your comment seems to indicate your don't really get social media's emerging crucial role in the reporting of important events.
      Twitter and YouTube allowed the protesters in the Arab uprisings to show the world what was happening - for the first time ever. Journalists couldn't get in or couldn't their reasoned analysis out by traditional means - but anyone armed with a phone and a twitter account could.
      That has absolutely no similarities to the failings of George W Bush's intelligence services.
      And of course we need analysis and journalism - no one is suggesting otherwise.
      Journalists have flocked to Twitter and YouTube videos have become a mainstay of the media's coverage of the Syrian conflict.
      And its not '140 character hashtags' - just 140 characters.

      report
    4. Tim Mazzarol

      Winthrop Professor, Entrepreneurship, Innovation, Marketing and Strategy at University of Western Australia

      In reply to Jason Bryce

      Hi Jason,

      Sorry if my comments upset you. I actually do get the power of social media and have no argument with your view that Twitter and YouTube played a role in the Arab Spring uprisings. However, I think we still need to get more reliable and objective information as to just how much of a role they played.

      Social media for revolutions is a two-edge sword. It can be used by people to rally their movement to help overthrow dictators.

      It can also be used by the forces of darkness to rally…

      Read more
    5. Jason Bryce

      logged in via Twitter

      In reply to Tim Mazzarol

      You didn't upset me.
      You analysis defeats your own argument. Most social interaction between people is conversation and gossip and so most TV, radio, print, online and social media is just the same.

      report
    6. Tim Mazzarol

      Winthrop Professor, Entrepreneurship, Innovation, Marketing and Strategy at University of Western Australia

      In reply to Jason Bryce

      Hi Jason,

      Thank you for your response, (which is 165 characters without spaces), but you will need to explain it better for me.

      How does my analysis defeat my own argument?

      report
    7. Jason Bryce

      logged in via Twitter

      In reply to Tim Mazzarol

      Once, as you point out, TV was the new new media thing and attracted debate and criticism and made great promises - some of which came true. And some of the criticism proved to be correct as well.
      But there is no doubt that we can't ignore TV and the role it plays in politics, exposing great events, bringing the news home and even in analysis of the news. Now Twitter is part of the media landscape and someone like you saying "it doesn't do it for me" is a bit pointless and disappointing.
      Currently…

      Read more
    8. Tim Mazzarol

      Winthrop Professor, Entrepreneurship, Innovation, Marketing and Strategy at University of Western Australia

      In reply to Jason Bryce

      Hi Jason,

      Thank you for the elaboration. Once again, if my comments have upset you in relation to Twitter then please accept my apology.

      I am not opposed to social media and I am certainly not opposed to "the new thing". Far from it actually if you actually knew me, which you don't.

      I agree with you that social media is a potentially important media. Yet I remain concerned and still somewhat suspicious that it will have all the positive impacts that some are touting. The experience of TV shows that media is a tool that must be carefully handled and we must never become complacent that it is all good.

      I'm not arguing to turn off Twitter. I accept that it is a tide that cannot be turned off. I simply suggest that we pause and think what such media does to the quality of our public discourse and ultimately our thinking.

      report