Sections

Services

Information

UK United Kingdom

Bald men and combs: the Cameron-Kirchner Falklands showdown

Argentinean wordsmith Jorge Luis Borges could be cryptic. But his powers of perception were always daunting. Borges came up with an excellent description of the 10 week conflict in 1982 that took place…

Argentinian President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner is part of a renewed push to reclaim the Falkland Islands. EPA/Leo La Valle

Argentinean wordsmith Jorge Luis Borges could be cryptic. But his powers of perception were always daunting. Borges came up with an excellent description of the 10 week conflict in 1982 that took place over the Falkland Islands, or Las Islas Malvinas, as the Argentineans call them.

He said it was a battle by two bald men over a comb.

This rather costly comb still resides with the British – and it has proven after the war to be non-negotiable. Thirty years after the Falklands War as tensions rise again, the bald men now are members of the British Cameron government on the one hand, and the Argentinian Cristina Fernández de Kirchner administration on the other.

Both countries are playing to a gallery they believe is full – the British, to remind themselves that they could still win wars, deploy such ships as the HMS Dauntless, and dress in suitable military attire (as Prince William did recently there on deployment); the Argentineans, that they could still make some claim over the islands they have longed for since their small settlement was expelled by the British in 1833.


View Falkland Islands in a larger map

This year provides both governments with a chance to commemorate, extol and badger their constituents over one of the most needless wars of the twentieth century.

Kirchner herself has taken the approach of giving “peace a chance”, a gear that politicians immediately move into when they want to flirt with conflict or etch themselves into some contrarian corner of history. Lest we forget – till the next war bugle is sounded.

On Tuesday, she began her evening speech on national television by reading the decree declassifying the Rattenbach report ordered by the Argentina’s Junta following the nation’s defeat in June 1982.

Well as she might – the report itself, the bitter fruits of General Benjamin Rattenbach’s labour examining the failings of Argentina’s war effort was only previously fed in parts to the public, given its perceived sensitivity.

“This will show that the full responsibility of the military adventure was a spurious military Junta, not the Argentine people; the Junta was the war monger, not the people in spite of circumstantial support for the events of 1982.”

Argentine prisoners of war at Port Stanley during the Falklands war. Wikimedia commons/Griffiths911

Kirchner herself is leafing through the book of true politics – minimise responsibility; isolate the appropriate scapegoats. War is evidently best left to people other than generals. Nor was it the outcome of madly misdirected nationalism by a nation, but the adventurist lunacy of men in uniform.

Kirchner’s strategy is now to remove, or at the very least anesthetise nationalist sentiment, while arguing the British have themselves submitted to mad-dog nationalism in times of desperation. (One might see mirrors here – the 1982 war began with a desperate effort by the Junta to focus attention on something offshore, away from a disastrous economic situation; the current British “militarisation”, an effort to do the same even as Kirchner seeks a distraction of her own.)

Prince William timed his high-profile deployment to the Falklands with the 30th anniversary of the Falklands war. EPA/SGT ANDY MALTHOUSE ABIPP

Cameron’s rebuke is to speak of the welfare of citizens of the Falklands in the face of neo-colonial efforts. “What the Argentines have been saying recently… is far more like colonialism, because these people want to remain British and the Argentines want them to do something else.”

Las Malvinas, Kirchner claims, could not be seen to be merely of interest to Argentina, but are, in fact, “a continental cause, a South American cause.” The disease taking place in the South Atlantic is militarisation. “I have instructed our foreign secretary to submit before the UN Security Council and the UN assembly this militarisation, which is a serious risk to international security.” Put aside the war drums in favor of diplomatic techniques, but still demonstrate the country’s hang ups over the islands.

Even if the Argentine war horse was to be saddled up, what would it amount to? Obsolete Pucara aircraft, Skyhawk and Super Etendards perhaps.

Other measures are being sought. Embargoes, for all their worth, are always on the cards. Kirchner has convinced the Community of Latin American and Caribbean states (CELAC), to formally adopt “all measures that can be put into place to impede entry into its ports of ships that fly the illegal flag of the Malvinas Islands.”

Argentinian activists protest the deployment of Prince William to the Falklands. EPA/Daniel Feldman

The Kirchner government might do a better job convincing constituents that the Falklands is the comb that it is, a black hole for British taxpayers, a drain on the treasury.

Both parties, in the past and present, have behaved in an idiotic fashion. The contestants remain those hopelessly bald men in search of combs with a considerably high price tag.

Join the conversation

5 Comments sorted by

  1. Iain Wicking

    Director

    Aside from all the commentary and silly posturing the bottom line is that there a several thousand people on the Islands that do not want to be subjects of Argentina and have the right of self determination.

    It is ironic the neo-peronist in Argentina talks about 'giving peace a chance' when in 82 Argentina initiated the conflict via naked aggression and prior to that had murdered up to 30,000 of its own people.

    I guess the prospect of significant oil and gas reserves is stirring the pot.

    report
  2. Mat Hardy

    Lecturer in Middle East Studies at Deakin University

    I disagree with the conclusion. In the case of 1982, it was one of the bald men who started the fight. The other one quite effectively finished it. For the agressor to now start accusing the other one of bellicosity is beyond absurd. Indeed, the only thing more absurd would be the basis of the Argentinian territorial claim in the first place.

    report
  3. Warwick Fry

    logged in via email @gmail.com

    The general thrust of this article is OK, but I can't agree that Argentine nationalism was not a significant factor in 1982. I was travelling in the region in 1982 and had numerous arguments and discussions with Latin Americans (of countries other than Argentina) whereby I expressed my puzzlement that many Latin American leftists and leftist movements were coming to the support of the neo-fascist Argentinian generals. It was viewed, in the Latin American context as a continuation of the century old…

    Read more
  4. Anthony Kaye

    Retired Vet. Surgeon

    As a Brit it is always fascinating to read what others think of the Falklands situation- and how wrong they might be.
    I'll only make three points:
    Prince William as a serving member of the armed forces is told what to do by his superiors. Of course he's delighted to be seen doing his bit-it's less ammunition for those who think the Royals are a bunch of parasites.
    Every democratic Argentine politician should be delighted we won- otherwise Argentina might still be lingering under the torturing heels of a bunch of degenerate fascist generals.
    Taking and keeping the islands would have been a great signal for other tyrannies to do the same.
    As far as the oil goes-if there is any- let the Islanders keep it. It's no more than their due for livinjg in such a windswept and isolated place.

    report