Shaving. Waxing. Sugaring. Creams. Laser. Threading. Electrolysis. When it comes to pubic hair, there’s certainly more than one way to skin the [cat]! But more important than the exact method are the health implications of pubic hair and the risks associated with its removal.
What’s “normal” in the pubic hair landscape has changed considerably over the last 20 years. Research suggests that pubic hair removal is increasingly the norm in Australia, the United States, and the United Kingdom; but has been documented as early as Ancient Egypt.
Recent studies of hair removal in young Australian women show that almost 50% of female undergraduates remove most or all of their hair. This trend is also present in men: about two-thirds of both gay and heterosexual Australian men remove pubic hair, mostly to improve perceived attractiveness.
Other reasons cited for hair removal include: possible increased skin sensitivity, perceived cleanliness, experimentation, and to please a partner.
Pubic hair vs. going bare
Pubic hair is an important marker of puberty, and signifies a transition toward adulthood. There’s a lot of debate about the actual function of pubic hair (cushioning, warmth, dust or bacteria catcher, pheromone transmitter), but no real conclusion. Keeping pubic hair doesn’t have any negative effects, other than the occasional crab infestation, but many people choose to remove some or all of their pubic hair, lest their pubic hair becomes public hair!

But what about going bare? Can a lack of pubic hair affect health? Well, yes. A lack of pubic hair prevents pubic lice transmission. In fact, as removing pubic hair became more common, rates of pubic lice decreased. So in the case of pubic lice, bare genitals win!
A lack of pubic hair doesn’t, in itself, affect health in any other way. But the method of hair removal can affect health. The infectious risks of these practises, particularly among those with a weakened immune system, is often under-appreciated.
Salon conditions and tools employed for removal can transmit bacterial infections. And shaving can cause small skin tears (even some that are not visible) that can provide additional sites for sexually transmitted infections (STI). A 20-year-old Australian woman with poorly controlled diabetes, for instance, had to go to hospital with life-threatening Streptococcus pyogenes and Herpes simplex infection of her genitalia following a routine Brazilian wax.
If you are going to wax, be informed! Careful hair removal, either on your own or at reputable salons, is the key to maintaining health when it comes to baring it all (or parts).
Should it stay or should it go?
Whatever you decide, here are five things everyone should know about pubic hair removal.
- It grows back: no matter what method you use to remove your hair (including more “permanent” methods such as laser), it will grow back. The texture of pubic hair may change when it grows back.
- Shaving needs prep: trim your pubic hair with a trimmer or scissors before you begin to shave it, use shaving cream, and always test an area first!

Shaving pubic hair needs preparation. Mace Ojala - Use chemicals with care: buy a depilatory designed specifically for pubic hair removal. Only apply it to the genital area after testing it on a smaller area first. This may not be a good option for you if you have sensitive skin. If your skin develops severe irritation afterwards, go see a doctor!
- Waxing warrants caution: home waxing kits come in both cold and hot wax varieties – cold kits may not work as well but are certainly safer to use in the genital region. If you’re going to a salon, choose a professional location that makes safety a priority.
- Laser or electrolysis lasts longer, but not forever – if you really want it all gone and for a long time, explore laser hair removal treatments or electrolysis. These treatments are done over several months and may cause some pain and skin irritation.
And while we’re here, let’s also put an end to the three most common myths about pubic hair removal:
- The rate of hair regrowth will not change because of hair removal.
- Hair coverage will not change in density; your body has a set number of hair follicles.
- Ingrown hairs are common but not impossible to avoid; everyone has different susceptibility to ingrown hairs.
From a public health standpoint, pubic hair doesn’t have any advantages, but the negative health effects associated with hair removal processes are of some concern. And despite recent attacks against hair removal, keeping pubic hair isn’t right for everyone. As long as you’re careful with the removal process, you can be just as healthy (or even more healthy!) with little or no pubic hair.
Bob Buick
Retired medical consultant
I've not seen any significant study of this, but I've often wondered whether there's any relationship between preference for the pre-pubertal appearance of shaved pudenda and the apparent increase in child molestation.
Of course, "decorations" like tattoos, rings, studs, make-up, high heels, hair bleaching etc. are another matter and their increase reflects a swing towards the perceived importance of appearance and packaging over content in current society.
Ian Smith
PhD candidate (ecology)
i doubt there is a "apparent increase in child molestation",
I think what we are more likely to find is an increase in reporting of child molestation (both from the child/parents as well as from the media, fear sells).
Bob Buick
Retired medical consultant
I believe you've defined the meaning of "apparent".
Tim Scanlon
Debunker
Not really logical Bob. I doubt anyone has ever looked at a fully grown woman and mistaken them for a pre-pubescent child (within reason). Since people don't go running around naked, we see the person first and not the genitals, thus it is unlikely that shaving can drive attraction.
I think it is more likely that your second comment is true, with people wanting to style their bodies.
Alex Cannara
logged in via LinkedIn
"Amazing what you see when you're out without your gun!" -- old farmer saying.
Hair follicles are the source of stem cells to repair surrounding skin damage, so don't kill 'em anywhere, or you'll be unhappy later.
Bob Buick
Retired medical consultant
Good points.
We might also include the lubricant effect of hair and sweat, as well as the aesthetic benefit of partial concealment, which have worked well during our evolution.
Sue Ieraci
Public hospital clinician
It's likely that the easy access to internet porn is creating a "false norm" in our society by showing mainly groomed pubic regions in women.
If a teenager's view of what looks appealing is shaped by this internet porn exposure, the new norm becomes self-fulfilling.
Having said that, though, there are other more ancient (and perhaps more misogynistic) societies where total removal of body hair has been the norm for a long time.
Interestingly, shaving of male beards, which is almost ubiquitous in our culture, also causes cuts, ingrown hairs and is very irritating in the presence of acne. What do others think about the public health effects of face shaving?
Sebastian Poeckes
Retired
Having worn a full beard for a decade or three, I came under considerable pressure to shave before a son's wedding "because the grey beard makes you look too old". Lacking the courage of my convictions I complied. Mind you I then dyed my hair just to be ironic.
Since that time I have more or less remained clean shaven. And, yes, I can only agree that shaving causes considerable irritation. I see no good reason to shave other than it leads to a quieter life - no agitation from the childer. But I let the dye grow out and am silver on top once more.
Oh how I miss the '70s!
Dianna Arthur
Dianna Arthur is a Friend of The Conversation.
Environmentalist
In the 70's I do believe that the average Joe's chances of getting laid were far greater then - grow your beard, grow your hair - Errol should be so lucky.
;)
I do not have a problem with the beard per se, provided it is well maintained. However, I am thinking that maintaining a good trim beard would be more work than just shaving the entire facial area.
Sebastian Poeckes
Retired
Oh no, Dianna. I'm here to tell you that keeping a trimmed beard is far less trouble than shaving. Also there is less chance of ingrown hairs, nicks, collar irritation and all the expense of shaving paraphernalia as well. Surely the same can be said for letting the pubes grow freely too. Never could see the point of Brazilians.
Dianna Arthur
Dianna Arthur is a Friend of The Conversation.
Environmentalist
"Never could see the point of Brazilians."
Waste of time, money and why would anyone stay with someone who insisted that the genital area be bald?
ernest malley
farmer
As with so much these daze, it seems a case of Life (if that it be) imitating art (or rather porn which is rarely that). Similarly the insanity of labial surgery - surely again the result of porn - the dumb boys think the hairless, trimmed & tucked pube is hot and from some bizarre reason the girlfriends comply.
I don't know what the current term is but it used to be called "false consciousness" so maybe it is a new type of Stockholm syndrome?
Alex Cannara
logged in via LinkedIn
We can observe the folks acting selfishly against some piece of reality & science, and then we can observe them when in need of help, say by a physician, surgeon, or even a dentist.
Their self interest will be evident both times.
Anthony Santella
Lecturer in HIV, STIs and Sexual Health at University of Sydney
Wow, thanks for all of the thoughtful and provocative comments. This is certainly a topic for debate!
André Brett
PhD candidate, New Zealand history at University of Melbourne
I think this is a great, well-written article - and I was especially pleased to see it avoid indulging in the banal arguments (that some comments have used) about "people only shave pubic hair because porn" or "people who like shaved partners might have paedophilic tendencies". I kind of expected something mindless from the headline, given the ridiculous viewpoints that have been given space elsewhere, e.g. The Age.
Thanks to such silly articles and arguments, the topic of pubic hair has come…
Read moreDianna Arthur
Dianna Arthur is a Friend of The Conversation.
Environmentalist
I enjoyed the points you made. And agree that generalisations about Brazilians resulting in more paedophiles as spurious indeed.
However there is pressure placed on both men and women to de-fur and the hairless look is fast becoming the accepted norm.
Bob Buick
Retired medical consultant
I agree with your first sentence, but I'm surprised that a Ph.D. candidate should be so prone to inaccurate interpretation, misquoting and reliance on anecdotal evidence.
My impression is that all other contributors have made serious enquiries or comments, leavened by an occasional flash of wit.
Matthew Wyres
Mechanical Engineer
I'm surprised no one has mentioned the practical benefits of groomed pubic hair on non-penetration sexual acts (shaved face on a man produces benefits here also), rather than the reactionary molestation, porn, peadophilia comments
Sue Ieraci
Public hospital clinician
But Matthew - what about stubble?
John Harland
bicycle technician
Is it part of a whole package of tattooing, plastic surgery - including genital surgery and piercing?
As with each of those, perhaps it is another form of self-mutilation by people who feel out-of-control of their circumstances. A syndrome common amongst ill-treated domestic animals, as I understand.
Related to porn, arguably, because it is another displacement activity.
Peter Gerard
Retired medical practitioner
To me the most logical reasons for removing pubic hair, in both sexes, are
1] With swimming costumes briefer than ever before, it is necessary to trim pubic hair if you don't want it on public display.
2] Oral sex is supposed to be the commonest form of sexual intercourse among young people and a face-full of pubic hair wouldn't be all that inviting.
There are reports, by the way, that oral sex, may be leading to an increase in cancer of the mouth and oesophagus, due to the human papilloma virus. Vaccination of school girls and boys will most likely reverse this observed trend.
Spring Chenoa Cooper
Senior Lecturer at University of Sydney
Hi Peter! Great comments....
Oral sex IS super common (and most often without any form of barrier protection). While a face full of pubic hair may not be super inviting, the additional disease risk caused by hair removal is of concern!
Especially when people are young and often have multiple oral sex partners. And it is true that HPV causes mouth/throat cancers, and having tears or cuts in the skin due to hair removal would increase possibility for HPV transmission as well.
While we are seeing pretty good uptake of HPV vaccine in girls (about 75% nationally), it could be improved. And boys will be offered the HPV vaccine as of 2013, so we'll have to wait to see what the uptake rate is among males!
The main concern I think we have here is that adolescents (and most adults) don't realize the additional risk they may be putting themselves at with pubic hair removal. Therefore, they may not be taking the precautions that they need to for optimal sexual health.
Dianna Arthur
Dianna Arthur is a Friend of The Conversation.
Environmentalist
Oral sex IS super common, one of the most pleasurable acts for men is to have their balls licked - yet to see many men having their balls given the Brazillian.
Meanwhile so many young women seem to think they have to remake their bodies just for men.