Scientists must bear some responsibility for the post-truth era and the current crisis in democracy.
It’s only two lines long, but this piece of parliamentary business could cause a lot of trouble.
The Conservatives may be willing to sacrifice what’s left of the UK’s beleaguered social model to maintain the City’s global status.
Holyrood won’t get a veto, but the Supreme Court has done the union no favours.
A certain mentality has been on display in Western democracies of late – and we don’t really understand it.
Scotland’s national poet was seen as having the potential to stir up revolutionary sentiment in the 19th century.
It’s not the end of Brexit but parliament could give the government a rough ride.
The foundations are shaky after the previous regime, but there are reasons to be optimistic about Theresa May’s initiative.
There is no guarantee that the UK can or will continue to be part of the €80 billion EU research funding programme Horizon2020.
Only by privileging an English-speaking, Western position can we say that ‘post-truth’ emerged in 2016.
The people who voted for the new American president may not be as hard for the Left to reach as it may appear.
Great expectations or much ado about nothing?
The UK government’s inability to devise a fundamentally new economic policy is why it will likely fudge a soft Brexit.
Brexit and Trump pave the way for more financial market uncertainty.
After Brexit, Theresa May says the UK will ‘take back control of our laws’.
A future of trade wars and isolationism will not solve the grand challenges which are dragging down fragile economies.
British business will be hoping that, by shrouding herself in the Union Jack, Theresa May has not overplayed her hand.
Going in with all guns blazing is not really how Europe does business – but that’s never stopped Britain.
With a second Scottish referendum ‘all but inevitable’, here’s a strange pill for the nationalists to swallow.
The one audience that was prepared for a hard Brexit, it seems, was the City of London.