tag:theconversation.com,2011:/ca/topics/go8-3100/articlesGo8 – The Conversation2018-08-14T04:18:36Ztag:theconversation.com,2011:article/1015172018-08-14T04:18:36Z2018-08-14T04:18:36ZNational Press Club address: Ian Jacobs on universities, Australia’s ‘hidden’ asset<figure><img src="https://images.theconversation.com/files/231839/original/file-20180814-2912-1h9l5l9.jpeg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=45&auto=format&w=496&fit=clip" /><figcaption><span class="caption">In 2016, it cost A$12.4 billion to operate the Group of Eight universities, of which public funds from the government provided A$6.7 billion. The London Economics report reveals that the work of the Group of 8, delivered a return of over A$66 billion to the nation.</span> <span class="attribution"><span class="source">UNSW</span></span></figcaption></figure><p><em>President and Vice-Chancellor of UNSW and Chair of the Group of Eight Universities, Professor Ian Jacobs, addressed the National Press Club in Canberra today.</em></p>
<p><em>Here is an edited transcript of his speech.</em></p>
<hr>
<p>Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen.</p>
<p>I want to start by acknowledging that we stand on the land of the Ngunnawal people, and pay my respects to them as the traditional custodians of the land and to their elders past and present.</p>
<p>My thanks to the National Press Club for this invitation. It is a privilege to be here to deliver my address titled: “Australia’s hidden asset: Universities are the New Wealth of Nations.”</p>
<p>I do so in my capacity as Chair of the <a href="https://go8.edu.au/">Group of Eight</a> universities, but I want to emphasise that we see our eight universities as just one part of the spectrum of post-secondary education - including vocational, TAFE and other outstanding universities - all equally crucial to the future of Australia. We support an integrated approach across the full spectrum of educational offerings, noting that university is just one of many routes to a successful and worthwhile life and career.</p>
<p>But today, I am here to deliver a number of important messages about the impact of the Go8 universities.</p>
<p>My first message is about our economic impact, billions of dollars, as set out in a report commissioned from London Economics, which I launch today.</p>
<p>The second message is about the need for our universities to more effectively communicate the way that we contribute to and serve Australian society.</p>
<p>The third is a call to action to increase business-university collaboration, and drive the research pipeline from discovery to commercialisation to maximise Australia’s future prosperity. </p>
<hr>
<p>
<em>
<strong>
Read more:
<a href="https://theconversation.com/australia-can-do-a-better-job-of-commercialising-research-heres-how-95526">Australia can do a better job of commercialising research – here's how</a>
</strong>
</em>
</p>
<hr>
<p>But before I make those points, I want to talk about the role of higher education as a pillar of the economic wellbeing and social progress of nations. </p>
<p>Australia is a higher education exemplar. Just 0.3% of the world population but home to 25, that is 5%, of the top 500 ranked universities globally - 16 fold above our size. On a per capita basis, our Group of 8 universities are better represented in the <a href="https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings">QS Top 100</a> ranking of universities across the world than the higher-education giants of the US and the UK.</p>
<p>The history of Australia’s universities began in 1850 when William Charles Wentworth sought to establish the University of Sydney to give “the opportunity for the child of every class” to become “great and useful in the destinies of this country”. I share Wentworth’s vision and feel passionately about this objective being achieved in Australia, and on a global scale. </p>
<p>Like many of my generation in western democracies, I was the first in my family to go to university. My father left school at 15 to work in a factory, but my parents recognised the value of education and encouraged me throughout my studies at the University of Cambridge. This has provided me a fulfilling career as a doctor, surgeon medical researcher, charity worker, and now as a university leader.</p>
<p>Working and travelling in many countries, I have witnessed the joy and satisfaction that educational opportunities - both academic and vocational - can bring to people of all backgrounds.</p>
<p>We have come a long way since Wentworth’s time. Outstanding universities have been critical to the social and economic success of Australia. And globally, there is a direct link between periods of university expansion and periods of economic growth like the industrial and commercial revolutions. That trend continues today.</p>
<p>We are witnessing the massive expansion of universities in China and now India - alongside an extraordinary pace of economic development. It is indisputable that education is a key to breaking entrenched disadvantage, and a major contributor to reducing inequality worldwide.</p>
<p>Adam Smith’s book “The Wealth of Nations” - published in the 1700s - maintained that if individuals act in their own interests, the whole nation will benefit.
In his recent book “The New Wealth of Nations” Indian economist, Surjit Bhalla, argues that the true key to prosperity today is providing individuals with an education. </p>
<p>Education is the new wealth of nations.</p>
<p>As Bhalla notes: “The industrial revolution transformed lives - primarily in the western world. But the education revolution has transformed lives all over the world.” </p>
<p>When the University of Sydney was established, just 10% of the world was literate and wages had been stagnant for centuries. </p>
<p>Today, 86% of the global population is literate, millions of people have been lifted out of poverty and human capital, achieved through education, is even more valuable, globally, than any financial asset. </p>
<p>Like financial assets, it yields an income and myriad other benefits.
Unlike financial assets, it cannot be hoarded or lost and is a powerful force for equality.</p>
<p>As our prime minister acknowledges “the most valuable resource we have in our nation is not under the ground… it is walking around on top of it”. </p>
<p>Knowledge - the original renewable resource - is our most precious commodity in this high-tech world. And Australia, courtesy of our post-secondary education sector, generates it in abundance. </p>
<p>So, against that backdrop, I come to my first message, about the economic impact of the Group of Eight universities.</p>
<p>I am grateful for the contribution of our Chief Executive Vicki Thomson and my colleague Group of 8 Vice Chancellors - Glyn Davis, Deputy Chair Dawn Freshwater, Margaret Gardner, Peter Hoj, Peter Rathjen, Brian Schmidt, and Michael Spence - in commissioning and guiding the work I now present. For clarity, colleagues, that was in alphabetical order not order of importance.</p>
<hr>
<p>
<em>
<strong>
Read more:
<a href="https://theconversation.com/national-press-club-address-glyn-davis-on-a-smarter-australia-12503">National Press Club address: Glyn Davis on a smarter Australia</a>
</strong>
</em>
</p>
<hr>
<p>Life-changing, society-advancing endeavours are the fundamental contributions of our universities. But, as a sector, we are also rightly asked to justify ourselves in financial terms. Our economic impact tells a compelling story. A story which may surprise some and, I hope, excite many.</p>
<p>Earlier this year, we commissioned an independent <a href="https://www.go8.edu.au/sites/default/files/docs/article/go8_london-economics-report.pdf">report</a> by London Economics - a world-leading specialist policy and economics consultancy - on the impact of the Group of Eight. The take-home message is simple - there are few more worthwhile investments in Australia today than higher education. </p>
<p>In 2016, it cost A$12.4 billion to operate the Group of Eight universities, of which public funds from the government provided A$6.7 billion. The London Economics report reveals that the work of the Group of 8, delivered a return of over A$66 billion to the nation.</p>
<p>That is a 10 fold return on the government’s investment.</p>
<p>That A$66 billion return came from four areas: research, teaching and learning, educational exports, and direct university expenditure. I will share some highlights and the full report is available today.</p>
<p>Astonishingly, every one dollar of public funding spent on Go8 university research generated A$9.76 across the rest of the Australian economy.</p>
<p>Every one dollar of public money invested in our research generates a roughly 10 fold return for the Australian economy. And I should note that London Economics adopted a conservative methodology. </p>
<p>Clearly, funding research is an astute investment in the future of the nation.</p>
<p>But that is not where the impact ends. Every 1,000 jobs created within a Group of Eight university supports more than 2,400 jobs throughout Australia. </p>
<p>And while the Go8’s more than 100,000 overseas students bring a depth and breadth to campus life that is impossible to quantify, it is their economic contribution we focus on in this report. </p>
<p>For every three overseas students studying at Group of Eight universities, A$1 million of economic activity is generated in other parts of the Australian economy.
That is because as well as working hard our international students experience our lifestyle. </p>
<p>Beyond tuition fees, our students go out to cafes, restaurants and to see movies. They pay rent and bills, buy food and use public transport.
And their friends and family come to visit as tourists. </p>
<p>According to the London Economics report, the average non-fee expenditure per student during the course of their studies is A$51,000 - totalling A$8.5 billion for our 2016 student cohort, supporting more than 29,000 Australian jobs. These are not jobs for academics or university administrators. They are jobs out in the community - chefs, waiters, taxi drivers, shop assistants, workers in construction, private enterprises and tourism.</p>
<p>And the economic return is not just confined to the period that international students study in Australia. </p>
<p>The prime minister, speaking about international education last week, said that Australia’s ability to capitalise on the opportunities of the Indo-Pacific depends on strong links to the region. </p>
<p>In his words, “The education sector has the capacity to influence this like few other industries.”
The connections forged - the money spent, the jobs created - are impacts of a dynamic university sector.</p>
<p>But they often go unrecognised or are hidden from view.
And the fault for that lies with us.</p>
<p>And so, the second message I want to convey today begins with a mea culpa. There are some exceptions, but on the whole, universities have not excelled at communicating their worth - and I believe it contributes to the current climate of criticism.</p>
<p>There is a perception, not just in Australia, that universities have failed to adapt to meet contemporary needs. And there appears to be a lack of understanding, of what universities offer our nation socially and economically.</p>
<p>We have not taken the community - the taxpayers who fund so much of what we do - along on our journey. </p>
<p>We need to improve communication with the community we serve and make the A$66 billion annual return from Go8 activity real to the Australian public.</p>
<p>One powerful way to explain this is to show what that amount of money would allow the government to provide for the Australian people on a yearly basis.</p>
<p>It is sufficient to entirely cover welfare payments for the aged.
It is twice the cost of Medicare.
It is more than enough to pay for the government’s entire education budget or its entire defence budget.
Such is the economic power of the education and research at just eight Australian universities.</p>
<p>But beyond the dollars we must communicate the real-world social impact of Australian universities. </p>
<p>Our photovoltaics researchers, for example, have constructed solar cells for more than 40 years, even when nobody understood the potential of their research.
Now this work has a key role in addressing climate change, providing progressively cheaper renewable energy generation across the world.</p>
<p>Another example, close to my heart having spent most of my career caring for women with cancer and researching in this area, is the Gardasil vaccine. </p>
<p>This is an extraordinary tale of scientific brilliance, healthcare advances and partnership between academia, industry and government - none of which, I should emphasise, had anything to do with me. </p>
<p>It is a great Australian story based on the brilliant research of Ian Frazer and the late Jian Zhou whose work at the University of Queensland made it possible to develop a vaccine to prevent this devastating disease. It has been a resounding financial success with returns to Australia exceeding A$1 billion to date. But, its benefits are much greater than that.</p>
<p>Preventing cervical cancer means less stress on health care, less productivity loss through illness and less reliance on welfare payments.
But transcending all of this is the human element of the Gardasil discovery.
I have witnessed, firsthand, how devastating cervical cancer can be.
I saw too many women in the UK die of this cancer, despite the latest therapy.
And over more than a decade of partnership in Uganda - where treatment and screening remain largely unavailable - I have seen women experience dreadful, unnecessary suffering and death from an entirely preventable disease. </p>
<p>Tragically, there are still over 500,000 cases of cervical cancer per year worldwide and over half of those women will die. Gardasil has the potential to save the lives of women in Australia, Uganda and every other country. </p>
<p>It offers prevention for women in countries with and without proper healthcare.
For the mother I diagnosed - whose own mother had died of cervical cancer and who feared desperately for the health of her daughter - the Gardasil vaccine means peace of mind.
How do you put a dollar figure on that?</p>
<p>You simply cannot put a price tag on the prevention of pain and suffering - for the person diagnosed or their loved ones.
And, yet, surely that is of the greatest value.
That is the real impact of our research. </p>
<p>That is how it benefits the Australian people and how it can become a gift to people around the world.</p>
<p>Is there anyone who would claim the time, energy and funding that went into Gardasil or solar energy research for that matter was wasted?</p>
<p>A recent Science and Technology Australia survey showed that 94% of respondents believe science and technology is important to their wellbeing and 78% think we should be investing more in research.</p>
<p>So why is there a disconnect between that public support and real-world investment?
It is up to the university sector to communicate clearly to Australians:</p>
<ul>
<li><p>the research that is being done</p></li>
<li><p>why it is important</p></li>
<li><p>and why they should champion the cause of research in Australia. </p></li>
</ul>
<p>For our part, Go8 universities, can better communicate our work and our pride in our research achievements. </p>
<p>There are many:</p>
<ul>
<li><p>University of Melbourne’s life changing cochlear implant</p></li>
<li><p>The University of Sydney’s non-invasive positive pressure treatment for sufferers of sleep apnoea</p></li>
<li><p>Monash University’s work to improve access to mental health services</p></li>
<li><p>ANU researchers’ quest to preserve Indigenous Australian languages at risk of extinction</p></li>
<li><p>University of Adelaide’s world leading winemaking and viticulture research.
UNSW work in zero-waste recycling and producing green steel</p></li>
</ul>
<p>Right now, Group of 8 researchers are also working in diverse areas from:</p>
<ul>
<li><p>reversing early tooth decay </p></li>
<li><p>and eco-friendly alternatives to chemical insecticides</p></li>
<li><p>to mitigating extreme heat in Australian cities</p></li>
<li><p>through extraordinary work to produce 3D replacement skin</p></li>
<li><p>and automation crucial to Australia’s mining industry </p></li>
<li><p>to cost effective, sustainable ways to repair sewage pipes, and</p></li>
<li><p>very much in our minds right now helping farmers with water usage.</p></li>
</ul>
<p>We are equally proud of the high-calibre alumni that Go8 universities produce.
Of 15 Australian Nobel Prize winners - one of whom is Vice Chancellor of the ANU, Brian Schmidt - 10 were Go8 educated.</p>
<p>Eight of the last 10 Australian Prime Ministers were Go8 alumni and our former students continue to achieve across the board, amongst them:</p>
<ul>
<li><p>the start-up, Tritium, building super-fast charging stations for electric vehicles</p></li>
<li><p>the first female CEO of the Macquarie Group</p></li>
<li><p>Akshay Venkatesh born in Delhi, educated in Australia and a graduate of the University of Western Australia who recently won the equivalent of the Nobel Prize for mathematics, the Fields Medal…congratulations Dawn and UWA colleagues.</p></li>
</ul>
<p>This is a mere fraction of what Go8 universities have produced - and given we graduate more than 96,000 students each year, our footprint will continue to grow.
It is a good news story and one we want to share.</p>
<p>As Chair of the Go8, and with the support of Chief Executive Vicki Thomson, Deputy Chair Dawn Freshwater and my colleague VCs we have developed an engagement initiative to better communicate the role of universities in the public sphere and place the Go8 at the centre of the big picture “national conversations” the sector and the nation needs to have. </p>
<hr>
<p>
<em>
<strong>
Read more:
<a href="https://theconversation.com/margaret-gardner-freezing-university-funding-is-out-of-step-with-the-views-of-most-australians-92570">Margaret Gardner: freezing university funding is out of step with the views of most Australians</a>
</strong>
</em>
</p>
<hr>
<p>That will involve a concerted and ongoing effort to enhance our communication with the Australian people and increased links with industry and business, the media, politicians and our alumni. It will also, of course, involve our students who have so much to contribute to this discussion.</p>
<p>Last month, along with senior staff from other Group of 8 universities and as part of our engagement initiative, I spent two days at a brainstorming event with Go8 student leaders. I was excited by the energy, ideas, emotional intelligence and the enthusiasm of this group and by their commitment to the importance of communicating the public service role of universities. I am delighted that some of those students - future leaders of Australia - are here today. They have a key role to play in explaining the public good of our universities.</p>
<p>So, to my third and final point. That is to call for a significant escalation in business-university collaboration - in cooperation with government, to drive the discovery-to-commercialisation pipeline, so as to maximise our country’s future wellbeing and prosperity.</p>
<p>Australia has successfully built a university research base which is the envy of much of the world. But, there is enormous potential in Australia’s research sector that remains untapped. Australian universities have great strength at the discovery end of the research pipeline. </p>
<p>In industry research, the focus is at the commercialisation end. There is a gap in between. We need to support the entire research pipeline - from discovery, to translation, to application, to commercialisation. </p>
<p>This pipeline is crucial to advances which change lives, create jobs, and support a modern 21st century economy and it is key to our ability to compete with emerging Asian nations and existing strength in Europe and North America. </p>
<p>While Go8 universities have enjoyed important successes with our research being commercialised here in Australia and creating jobs here in Australia, there are many stories of lost commercial opportunity because we have not had the money or the willing partner to complete the discovery-commercialisation pipeline. The solar research I mentioned is a case in point. </p>
<p>Developed in Australia but eventually finding commercialisation success overseas.
Do we want the economic return on the ‘next big thing’ discovered by Australian researchers to land here and create jobs here or in another country? If the answer is “here” - and of course it is - then we, as a nation, need to take action.</p>
<p>We thank successive governments for their vision in investing in research capacity in Australia and ask them to continue to invest in this area where Australia has a globally competitive edge.</p>
<p>Today, we face the reality that not only has Australia’s investment in R&D declined for the first time in two decades, but we lag internationally. We spend just 1.9 % of GDP on R&D while the OECD average is 2.3%, with Israel’s spend way up at 4.25%. Fear of failure may be one obstacle to investment in research.</p>
<p>When I shared this speech with UNSW Chancellor, David Gonski, he expressed the view “if in business you act ethically, legally, properly and without misrepresentation, then regardless of the business outcome there is value. We need to avoid an undue fear of failure in Australia”. Wise words.</p>
<p>I was heartened to hear of a growing consensus at the recent AFR Innovation Summit that it is time for action on our diminishing investment in R&D. I was equally pleased to see that business-university collaboration was identified as having a key role to play.</p>
<p>Innovation Science Australia Chair, Bill Ferris, has advocated a co-investment fund model, along the lines of the Biomedical Translation Fund, involving 50/50 sharing of equity by government and the private sector. </p>
<hr>
<p>
<em>
<strong>
Read more:
<a href="https://theconversation.com/politics-podcast-bill-ferris-on-australias-innovation-mission-91070">Politics podcast: Bill Ferris on Australia's innovation mission</a>
</strong>
</em>
</p>
<hr>
<p>Universities Australia Chair, Margaret Gardner, supported by Bill Ferris and our Chief Scientist Alan Finkel, suggests a “behavioural nudge” may encourage business to direct more of its R&D spending to the university sector. The vehicle for this would be a 20% R&D tax incentive collaboration premium. A component of the A$2 billion stripped from the R&D Tax Incentive scheme in the last Budget, could be channelled into this collaboration premium to incentivise industry and universities to work together.</p>
<p>Both of these suggestions are important and Innovation Minister Michaelia Cash has indicated that the Government will consider them in a future budget.</p>
<p>Another option I have proposed, is for the government to fill the translational gap for non-medical research - as the Medical Research Future Fund fills for medical research. An Australian Translational Research Fund of this type would encourage business-university collaboration to translate and apply the discovery research funded by the Australian Research Council.</p>
<p>And that means translating research in key ARC areas including food, soil and water, transport, energy, the environment, defence, cyber security, manufacturing, history, culture, languages and social structures. These are areas which are crucial to the wellbeing of our economy and our society, and they should command attention.</p>
<p>The opportunity is clear provided Australia can mobilise the investment required to generate the available return. </p>
<p>We have to stop seeing the funding of research as tantamount to a charitable donation. It is not. It is a sound business investment and, more importantly, an investment in the future of the nation. The A$24.5 billion per annum return on research investment in Australia’s Go8 universities could be many times higher. </p>
<p>In fact, the London Economic Report estimates that an extra A$500 million invested in research in our universities - of the order of the scale of the MRFF - would generate a return of approximately A$5.3 billion. If we increased R&D spend by 0.5% of GDP, just up to the OECD average, the return would be much greater.</p>
<p>There is enormous potential to maximise the impact of research through:</p>
<ul>
<li><p>investing more in the discovery to commercialisation pipeline</p></li>
<li><p>clearly communicating the role university research plays as a key economic driver</p></li>
<li><p>and incentivising academia and industry to work together.</p></li>
</ul>
<p>The Go8 will lead by example to move forward the conversation on business-university engagement. </p>
<p>In October this year - in partnership with the Business Higher Education Roundtable - we will host a summit of industry and university leaders, together with Australian Government officials. We will explore ways to maximise the return for our nation on Australia’s discovery to commercialisation pipeline.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the Group of Eight universities believe it is time to forge a new relationship with government, business and the Australian people. In making this commitment we offer the London Economics Report as evidence of our confidence in the economic value of education and research.</p>
<p>Our commitment is made as hubs of knowledge and independent thought, as champions of freedom, openness, human rights and justice, and as a force for increasing prosperity and equality. We believe that universities can serve Australian society in navigating the challenges and opportunities of our age.</p>
<p>The Group of 8 universities is committed to ensuring that Australia maintains its place as one of the most prosperous, advanced and socially responsible countries in the world and that Australians understand, value - and take pride in - the leading role of the higher education sector, in fulfilling that aspiration. </p>
<p>Thank you.</p><img src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/101517/count.gif" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" />
<p class="fine-print"><em><span>Ian Jacobs is the Vice-Chancellor of UNSW, the Chair of the Group of Eight universities, and sits on the board of The Conversation. </span></em></p>A new report found that every one dollar of public funding spent on Go8 university research generated A$9.76 across the Australian economy, a roughly 10 fold return on the government’s investment.Ian Jacobs, Vice Chancellor, UNSW SydneyLicensed as Creative Commons – attribution, no derivatives.tag:theconversation.com,2011:article/956582018-05-10T06:12:19Z2018-05-10T06:12:19ZDoes it pay to graduate from an ‘elite’ university? Not as much as you’d think<figure><img src="https://images.theconversation.com/files/217902/original/file-20180507-166897-1wo7aby.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=45&auto=format&w=496&fit=clip" /><figcaption><span class="caption">Attending an elite university appears to play a comparatively small role in determining a graduate’s starting salary.</span> <span class="attribution"><span class="source">Shutterstock</span></span></figcaption></figure><p>As the deadline for <a href="https://www.uac.edu.au">applications for mid-year admission</a> to university approaches, prospective students face two important choices: what to study, and at which university. </p>
<p>If past experience is any guide, places at the <a href="https://go8.edu.au/">Group of Eight</a> (Go8) universities will be in high demand. In 2017, the Go8 universities attracted <a href="https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/undergraduate_applications_offers_and_acceptances_2017.pdf">the largest share of undergraduate applications</a> and rejected more applications than any other type of university. </p>
<p>But our research shows attending one of these elite universities doesn’t in itself significantly increase the average starting salary for graduates. </p>
<h2>What makes the Go8 so popular?</h2>
<p>The Go8 universities have more favourable <a href="https://docs.education.gov.au/node/45231">student-to-staff ratios</a>, <a href="https://docs.education.gov.au/node/46151">better qualified staff</a>, superior <a href="http://www.universityrankings.com.au/research-excellence-rankings.html">research outcomes</a>, and better placement <a href="http://www.universityrankings.com.au/go8-rankings-group-of-eight.html">in university rankings</a> compared to non-Go8 universities. </p>
<p>That said, institutions of the <a href="https://www.atn.edu.au/">Australian Technology Network</a> (ATN) are broadly comparable in terms of class sizes and staff qualifications.</p>
<figure class="align-center ">
<img alt="" src="https://images.theconversation.com/files/218215/original/file-20180509-34018-qtkw5b.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=45&auto=format&w=754&fit=clip" srcset="https://images.theconversation.com/files/218215/original/file-20180509-34018-qtkw5b.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=45&auto=format&w=600&h=401&fit=crop&dpr=1 600w, https://images.theconversation.com/files/218215/original/file-20180509-34018-qtkw5b.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=30&auto=format&w=600&h=401&fit=crop&dpr=2 1200w, https://images.theconversation.com/files/218215/original/file-20180509-34018-qtkw5b.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=15&auto=format&w=600&h=401&fit=crop&dpr=3 1800w, https://images.theconversation.com/files/218215/original/file-20180509-34018-qtkw5b.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=45&auto=format&w=754&h=504&fit=crop&dpr=1 754w, https://images.theconversation.com/files/218215/original/file-20180509-34018-qtkw5b.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=30&auto=format&w=754&h=504&fit=crop&dpr=2 1508w, https://images.theconversation.com/files/218215/original/file-20180509-34018-qtkw5b.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=15&auto=format&w=754&h=504&fit=crop&dpr=3 2262w" sizes="(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px">
<figcaption>
<span class="caption">Universities of the ATN, like RMIT University, are broadly comparable to Go8 universities in terms of class sizes and staff qualifications.</span>
<span class="attribution"><span class="source">free range jace/flickr</span>, <a class="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/">CC BY-NC</a></span>
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>This leads to another question: do these superior institutional characteristics have a material impact on the earnings of their graduates? Conventional wisdom and <a href="http://papers.nber.org/books/beck75-1">economic theory</a> support a link between institutional characteristics and students’ employment outcomes. But the measurement of this effect is not straightforward. </p>
<hr>
<p>
<em>
<strong>
Read more:
<a href="https://theconversation.com/does-price-matter-when-picking-a-university-33008">Does price matter when picking a university?</a>
</strong>
</em>
</p>
<hr>
<p>Prospective students compete for university places on the basis of their past academic performance. So, any apparent earnings bonus enjoyed by the graduates of supposedly better-quality universities may, to an unknown extent, be the result of those universities recruiting more able students. </p>
<p>The characteristics of these students (including better academic performance) should make them more likely to be higher paid wherever they studied. That is to say, it may be the students who are “better quality”, rather than the university.</p>
<h2>Do graduates from Go8 unis earn more?</h2>
<p>In a recent <a href="http://ftp.iza.org/dp11477.pdf">discussion paper</a>, we investigated whether young undergraduates from the Go8 universities earn more, on average, than graduates from other universities in their first full-time job after graduation. We also looked at whether any such higher earnings are due to Go8 universities recruiting “better” students.</p>
<p>We used data from the <a href="http://www.graduatecareers.com.au/research/surveys/australiangraduatesurvey/">Graduate Destination Survey</a> and data on average <a href="http://www.vtac.edu.au/results-offers/atar-explained.html">Australian Tertiary Admission Ranks</a> (ATARs). </p>
<p>We found statistically significant evidence of variation in average starting salaries across university groupings. But the magnitude of the variation is only a few percentage points. The extra salary amounts enjoyed by Go8 graduates are even smaller when we control for: </p>
<ul>
<li><p>differences in the mix of fields studied </p></li>
<li><p>the geographical regions in which graduates work</p></li>
<li><p>the quality of students recruited. </p></li>
</ul>
<hr>
<p>
<em>
<strong>
Read more:
<a href="https://theconversation.com/five-myths-about-australian-university-graduate-outcomes-87074">Five myths about Australian university graduate outcomes</a>
</strong>
</em>
</p>
<hr>
<p>We found between 13% and 46% of the apparent Go8 salary bonus over other university groups are due to their recruitment of students with higher ATARs. So, attending an elite university appears to play a comparatively small role in determining one’s starting salary, at least relative to other factors.</p>
<p>This leaves us with the big question: why, given their superior characteristics, are the salary benefits associated with attending an elite university so small? We highlight three plausible explanations. </p>
<ol>
<li><p>The quality of undergraduate teaching is more similar across Australian universities than is implied by their characteristics</p></li>
<li><p>university characteristics, such as faculty qualifications and student-to-staff ratios, are not as important to the development of knowledge and skills in undergraduates than is normally assumed. For example, having a large share of academic staff with a PhD may contribute to an institution’s research output. But it may not contribute to the formation of productive knowledge in young undergraduates.</p></li>
<li><p>employers don’t use the institution you attended as a signal when making employment decisions, at least for young undergraduates just out of university.</p></li>
</ol>
<figure class="align-center ">
<img alt="" src="https://images.theconversation.com/files/218218/original/file-20180509-4803-1r8fkvc.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=45&auto=format&w=754&fit=clip" srcset="https://images.theconversation.com/files/218218/original/file-20180509-4803-1r8fkvc.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=45&auto=format&w=600&h=360&fit=crop&dpr=1 600w, https://images.theconversation.com/files/218218/original/file-20180509-4803-1r8fkvc.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=30&auto=format&w=600&h=360&fit=crop&dpr=2 1200w, https://images.theconversation.com/files/218218/original/file-20180509-4803-1r8fkvc.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=15&auto=format&w=600&h=360&fit=crop&dpr=3 1800w, https://images.theconversation.com/files/218218/original/file-20180509-4803-1r8fkvc.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=45&auto=format&w=754&h=452&fit=crop&dpr=1 754w, https://images.theconversation.com/files/218218/original/file-20180509-4803-1r8fkvc.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=30&auto=format&w=754&h=452&fit=crop&dpr=2 1508w, https://images.theconversation.com/files/218218/original/file-20180509-4803-1r8fkvc.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=15&auto=format&w=754&h=452&fit=crop&dpr=3 2262w" sizes="(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px">
<figcaption>
<span class="caption">ATAR is more important in predicting later salary.</span>
<span class="attribution"><span class="source">interestedbystandr/flickr</span>, <a class="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">CC BY</a></span>
</figcaption>
</figure>
<h2>Better quality measures</h2>
<p>Our results suggest prospective undergraduates looking to maximise the financial return on their educational investment are not well-served by standard measures of university quality. Student-to-staff ratios, the proportion of staff with a PhD, and research productivity measures are important for graduate students and researchers. But they don’t appear to have much relevance for the post-university salaries of undergraduates. </p>
<hr>
<p>
<em>
<strong>
Read more:
<a href="https://theconversation.com/prospective-higher-education-students-need-better-information-about-admissions-process-shergold-report-68856">Prospective higher education students need better information about admissions process: Shergold report</a>
</strong>
</em>
</p>
<hr>
<p>The choice of a university is a key decision for many young Australians. It’s important they’re provided with relevant information to help them make this choice.</p>
<p>A set of indicators that measure the effect of university choice on employment outcomes, regardless of the background and characteristics of the students, might help them make better decisions. Indicators of this type are already produced for US colleges by the <a href="https://www.brookings.edu/research/beyond-college-rankings-a-value-added-approach-to-assessing-two-and-four-year-schools/">Brookings Institution</a>.</p><img src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/95658/count.gif" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" />
<p class="fine-print"><em><span>The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.</span></em></p>Attending an elite university plays a small role in an undergraduate’s starting salary compared to other factors, such as high ATAR, the field of study they chose and the region in which they work.Massimiliano Tani, Professor of Finance and Economics, UNSW SydneyChris Heaton, Senior lecturer, Macquarie UniversityDavid Carroll, Academic Programs Analyst, Monash UniversityLicensed as Creative Commons – attribution, no derivatives.tag:theconversation.com,2011:article/267382014-05-21T23:46:49Z2014-05-21T23:46:49ZOn the creation of higher education cartels<figure class="align-center zoomable">
<a href="https://images.theconversation.com/files/49182/original/6xq8647c-1400709347.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=45&auto=format&w=1000&fit=clip"><img alt="" src="https://images.theconversation.com/files/49182/original/6xq8647c-1400709347.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=45&auto=format&w=754&fit=clip" srcset="https://images.theconversation.com/files/49182/original/6xq8647c-1400709347.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=45&auto=format&w=600&h=399&fit=crop&dpr=1 600w, https://images.theconversation.com/files/49182/original/6xq8647c-1400709347.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=30&auto=format&w=600&h=399&fit=crop&dpr=2 1200w, https://images.theconversation.com/files/49182/original/6xq8647c-1400709347.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=15&auto=format&w=600&h=399&fit=crop&dpr=3 1800w, https://images.theconversation.com/files/49182/original/6xq8647c-1400709347.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=45&auto=format&w=754&h=501&fit=crop&dpr=1 754w, https://images.theconversation.com/files/49182/original/6xq8647c-1400709347.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=30&auto=format&w=754&h=501&fit=crop&dpr=2 1508w, https://images.theconversation.com/files/49182/original/6xq8647c-1400709347.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=15&auto=format&w=754&h=501&fit=crop&dpr=3 2262w" sizes="(min-width: 1466px) 754px, (max-width: 599px) 100vw, (min-width: 600px) 600px, 237px"></a>
<figcaption>
<span class="caption">Who will succeed in the free market higher education economy?</span>
<span class="attribution"><a class="source" href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/carbonnyc/143186839">Flickr/David Goehring</a>, <a class="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">CC BY</a></span>
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>I love the free market. It means my morning cup of coffee costs roughly the same at almost all the coffee shops near campus. </p>
<p>The free market is however ruthlessly efficient, even if it is largely responsible for the high standard of living we share in Australia. It means fortunes are made and lost, and has Darwinian consequences for inefficient players. When monopolies exist, the profits can be obscene.</p>
<p>In the <a href="http://www.budget.gov.au/2014-15/index.htm">2014 Australian federal budget</a>, plans were announced to bring the full power of the free market to the Australian higher education sector. From 2016, universities will have their budgets reduced but be free to charge undergraduates <em><strong>literally whatever they like</strong></em>!</p>
<p>It is arguably the most radical reform of the sector since the abolition of fees in the 1970s and the introduction of the Higher Education Contribution Scheme (HECS) in the 1980s. </p>
<p>Prior to the federal budget there was a limit to the government assistance one received for educating a student and also a cap on what could be charged for normal undergraduate degrees.</p>
<p>This meant that a course’s true value could not be cashed in on by the host institution. Instead the only advantage were better students attending your university. For many academics, that sufficed.</p>
<p>There is good evidence that 17 and 18 year olds pay little attention to the HECS debt they will incur when selecting an undergraduate degree. The popularity of medicine and law was not diminished by a higher HECS debt than engineering or science for instance.</p>
<h2>The Group of Eight (Go8)</h2>
<p>Each of the major capital cities has one “established” university. Sydney and Melbourne contain a second large and established institution, namely UNSW and Monash University respectively. With the addition of the Australian National University, the mainland major institutions form the Group of Eight (<a href="https://go8.edu.au/">Go8</a>) who collectively lobby government on a range of common issues.</p>
<p>Indeed the Go8 are national leaders in many fields of research. They also have the highest tertiary entrance ranks for their undergraduate courses. Although many of us would like to believe otherwise, an increase in the price of a Go8 undergraduate course is unlikely to deter undergraduates from attending the Go8 institutions if their marks allow it. </p>
<p>In economic terms a Go8 degree has an inelastic demand curve, and since the federal budget these degrees are now a licence for the Go8 to print money.</p>
<p>Higher fees will enable the Go8 to attract better staff, conduct more research and it is possible the gap between the Go8 and more junior institutions will become a chasm. In the nightmare scenario for the second-tier institutions a positive feedback loop will drive the Go8 to glory at the expense of the others.</p>
<p>On the upside the budgets of at least some of our higher education institutions will rapidly expand but we shouldn’t be under any illusion as to who will be funding all of this. <em><strong>It will be the taxpayers of tomorrow with degrees.</strong></em> What the Federal government is doing is exchanging future government debt for massive student debts. </p>
<h2>Compounding the debt</h2>
<p>These debts could conceivably be very high. Buried in the details of the budget were some gotchas. One was that HECS debts will now incur compound interest.</p>
<p>Another was that PhD students will also incur additional HECS debt for each year of their PhD, and in the meantime have their undergraduate HECS compounding.</p>
<p>If, like me, they go overseas for a few years gaining international postdoctoral experience then they’ll have the option of staying there and remaining HECS free or returning to a large compounded HECS bill.</p>
<p>For women who take years off to have a family the effects will be especially severe. If they work part time while the kids are little they might not exceed the HECS threshold until they are well into middle age, and some might end up taking a HECS debt to the grave.</p>
<p>Is there really any difference between the government owing A$30 billion or our kids? Indeed this is not so much a brilliant taxation reform as a cost-shift similar to the one between the federal and state governments around schools and medicine. Some universities will get more money but the collective debt (personal and government) will be much greater than it was before when fees rise.</p>
<p>The temptation to see what the market will stand is an enormous one for the higher education sector. Once the Go8 hike their fees their increased revenue base will mean that others in the sector will have no choice but to follow or their ability to retain the best staff and compete in research will be minimal.</p>
<h2>Competition or cartels?</h2>
<p>The high cost of living in Australia means that only a small fraction of undergraduates leave their home cities to commence their first degrees. In fact many live at home.</p>
<p>For the Go8 this is a beautiful scenario. </p>
<ul>
<li><p>The smartest kids will still want to attend the most prestigious institutions regardless of the HECS debt they will incur. </p></li>
<li><p>The economic necessity of the stay-at-home Aussie undergraduate means that there is no real competition interstate except for the very rich, and in Sydney and Melbourne there are enough kids for both Go8’s.</p></li>
<li><p>In order to compete the non-Go8 will be forced to either slash the cost of their degrees or reduce their investment in research or both.</p></li>
</ul>
<p>One could argue that the Go8 has realised their monopoly on high value courses in each capital city, colluded with each other to lobby government to remove price caps, and now stand to exploit that monopoly to maximise their profits.</p>
<p>If they were in industry, their exclusive society and annual meetings would soon raise the ire of the Australia Consumer and Competition Commission. </p>
<p>Instead they’ll be cheered on by Education Minister Christopher Pyne as they surge up the international rankings, while our national debt is progressively transferred from our government to our children. Instead of politicians setting marginal tax rates, Vice Chancellors will. </p><img src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/26738/count.gif" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" />
I love the free market. It means my morning cup of coffee costs roughly the same at almost all the coffee shops near campus. The free market is however ruthlessly efficient, even if it is largely responsible…Matthew Bailes, Pro-Vice Chancellor (Research) , Swinburne University of TechnologyLicensed as Creative Commons – attribution, no derivatives.