Scientists have a lot to contribute – and a lot to lose.
Mic image via www.shutterstock.com.
The scientific community enjoys one of the highest levels of trust among American institutions. But engaging in the political arena during a contentious election season comes with dangers.
Three more years for Malcolm Turnbull and the Coalition.
AAP/David Moir
July 10, 2016
Jeff Borland , The University of Melbourne ; Ben Spies-Butcher , Macquarie University ; Deborah Ralston , Monash University ; Diana Perche , Macquarie University ; Emmaline Bexley , The University of Melbourne ; Glenn C Savage , The University of Melbourne ; Helen Dickinson , The University of Melbourne ; Jago Dodson , RMIT University ; Jim Gillespie , University of Sydney ; Joanna Mendelssohn , UNSW Sydney ; John Wanna , Australian National University ; Mary Anne Kenny , Murdoch University ; Merlin Crossley , UNSW Sydney ; Nicole Gurran , University of Sydney ; Robyn Eckersley , The University of Melbourne ; Susan Irvine , Queensland University of Technology , and Thas Ampalavanapillai Nirmalathas , The University of Melbourne
What’s in store for key policy areas, from health to education to infrastructure to asylum seekers, under a returned Coalition government?
GM protest in Montpellier.
Peter/Flickr
When the GM crop debate is confined to the human risks, it limits who can participate in the decision making and privileges scientists.
Aftershocks from the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union will be felt in Australian research.
Shutterstock/argus
Australian researchers engage in collaborative programs with both the UK and the rest of Europe. So what does Brexit mean for those collaborations?
www.shutterstock.com
What are the key policy issues on which the 2016 federal election will be fought?
Investment in science and innovation is needed to help build Africa.
Kate Holt/Africa Practice/Flickr
Successful economies are led by innovation and driven by knowledge. For Africa to advance, it needs to make more substantial investments in its research and development sector.
Will we see a repeat of this 2010 protest against planned cuts to science?
Shane/Flickr
A review by Paul Nurse, president of the Royal Society, has said the UK’s research councils should continue to be exist as part of a new quango.
Alan Finkel is a well respected member of the Australian scientific community.
AAP Image/Alan Porritt
The scientific community reacts to the news that Dr Alan Finkel has been appointed Australia’s New Chief Scientist as of 2016.
The new Prime Minister has an opportunity to reverse the cuts to science funding and transform Australia into an innovative nation.
Tracy Sorensen/Flickr
A Turnbull government has an opportunity to redirect Australia towards being a science and innovation nation.
Like in 2010, cuts to science are a real possibility.
sw77/Flickr
Science funding is changing – let’s make sure it’s for the better.
Inspiring role models can help more girls consider a career in science.
woodleywonderworks/Flickr
The new government should link policies on education, career progression and welfare to tackle the lack of women in science.
Research by James Cook University was rapidly translated into policy that is helping to preserve Queensland’s regions against the effects of climate change.
Nathan Siemers/Flickr
It’s rare for research to have an immediate impact on policy, but lessons learnt from a successful venture in Queensland can show how it can be done.
Thousands of people protested against planned cuts to science in 2010.
Mark Ramsay/Flickr
The UK’s commitment to a referendum on EU membership could already be harming the UK’s reputation in science.
Will this generation of politicians’ children choose science?
Shawn
Neither Labour nor the Conservatives have pledged to do as much as retain the current level of funding in their manifestos, despite their enthusiastic comments about science in the UK.
Australia has a long history of world class science, but a national science strategy will help boost engagement with industry.
Steve Dorman/Flickr
The government’s announcement of a national science strategy is good for Australia, particularly for promoting engagement between science and industry.
Funding, steady as she goes.
notes Alessandro Storniolo/Shutterstock.com
Science and research were not at the front of the political debate in 2010. So how has science funding fared under the coalition government?
‘This finding, like this stock image, is uncredible!’
Shutterstock
Scientific discoveries have moulded modern society. But the reliability of scientific results have recently been called into question. How will scientists solve this problem?
Science is under attack but we must defend it if we want to improve politics in Australia.
Victoria University
Our nation’s future depends on the quality of its thinking and its leaders. As such, science must be at the core of our national discourse.
The only way is down?
horiavarlan
After several delays, the UK government’s Department for Business, Innovation and Skills finally published its first strategy for UK science and innovation titled Our Plan for Growth. Strangely for such…
Ian Macfarlane – here at the Anglo Australian Telescope in April – had science lumped in with his industry ministry.
AAP/Alan Porritt
On science and technology, the Abbott government is somewhat of a paradox. On one hand, the government passionately believes that deregulating the university sector is essential. By taking caps off fees…