There’s no evidence that asylum seeker deterrence policy works

  1. Sharon Pickering

    Professor of Criminology at Monash University

Interception at sea causes unnecessary confusion for Navy and Customs personnel. AAP/ADF

Since 2001, the Border Crossing Observatory estimates 840 people have died between Australia and Indonesia, including the equivalent of eight kindergarten classes of children.

Policies of deterrence have become the “common sense” approach when it comes to what should be done about asylum seekers – both in terms of stopping the boats and in terms of saving lives.

The problem is that both these assumptions are largely unjustifiable based on the evidence.

Deterrence has not decreased deaths

Deterring irregular border crossings does not necessarily decrease border related deaths. Evidence suggests in some contexts deterrence can simply displace…

Read full post

Preventing deaths at sea: asking the experts on asylum seekers

  1. Sharon Pickering

    Professor of Criminology at Monash University

We can avoid needless tragedies if we address the evidence. AAP Image/Supplied by the WA Coroner Court

When asylum seekers die at sea it is time to reflect, but it is also time to evaluate evidence to come up with workable, sustainable and just solutions.

It is time for academics to inform this debate, advancing and evaluating the research. Angus Houston and his Expert Panel are making their assessments and crafting their advice to the Prime Minister. Academics need to do the same.

There is now a clear opportunity for research to influence the future of asylum and border control in Australia. Whether it is embraced is a matter ultimately for federal Parliamentarians and beyond the control of researchers. But this is no time to be put…

Read full post