
Analysis during campaign season centres on two things: what candidates say and how they’re performing in polls. We pay far less attention to the nuts-and-bolts of local organising. Yet the ground game matters, as we saw in this year’s Republican primaries. Though anti-Romney sentiment ran high, none of the anybody-but-Romney candidates could pull together a ground game to compete with his. Short of funds and unable to qualify for the ballot in key states, Romney’s competitors floundered through the primaries until it became clear only Romney could piece together enough delegates to secure the nomination.
In many ways, Romney has taken on their underdog role in the general election against President Barack Obama. Romney and his Boston-based team of strategists have far less experience than Team Obama running a national campaign, and analysts predicted the former Massachusetts governor would face major enthusiasm and fundraising gaps.
Yet Republicans have had an edge for most of the campaign in money and enthusiasm (though both may have been misallocated). GOP voters may not love – or even like – Romney, but they’re keen on defeating Obama. And the Obama campaign will fall well short of its one-time fundraising target of $1 billion.
The one thing we haven’t heard about, though, is Romney’s ground game: field offices, volunteers, get-out-the-vote drives. (We know the Republicans are working to keep out the vote when it comes to young and minority citizens, but that’s a subject for another day.)
Which is why I was excited to see this report from the Republican National Committee. It details volunteer contacts in swing states, showing numbers much higher than 2008. A snippet from the report:
“Overall, we have made more than 26 million voter contacts, thanks to the efforts of our 73,000 volunteers. This week, we expect to make our 30 millionth voter contact. By mid-September, we had already surpassed the 2008 operation in total volunteer voter contacts.
We’ve knocked on nearly 2 million more doors than in all of 2008, and we’ve made six times more phone calls than at this point four years ago."
Sounds promising. Here are the caveats:
—We don’t know the efficacy of these contacts — that is, whether they can sway undecided voters or turn out reticent ones.
—An excellent ground game can help decide a nail-biter but can’t overcome a significant lead (so if Obama pulls away in the next few weeks, the point is moot).
—The Obama ground game is nothing to sniff at. Yes, enthusiasm and donations are off the 2008 pace. Here in Miami, Obama bumper stickers and yard signs, plentiful in 2008, are rare sightings indeed. But the campaign has been experimenting with micro-targeting in swing states, and has twice as many field offices as Team Romney.
With those caveats in place, it looks as though Romney has put together a far better infrastructure than the McCain campaign in 2008. But before he can leverage that advantage, Romney will first have to generate some forward motion to close the growing gap between himself and Obama.
Brandt Hardin
logged in via Twitter
The dynamic duo of Romney and Ryan would drive the entire economy into a nose dive as long as it benefits the richest Americans. Income inequality is endangering the Middle Class and making paupers of us all who don’t have those millions upon millions of dollars. Read more about the role of Romney’s riches in this election and the power of his sacred undergarments at http://dregstudiosart.blogspot.com/2012/05/mitt-romneys-magic-mormon-underwear.html The working class of our country can’t AFFORD to allow this election to be bought and sold!
Minh-Quan Nguyen
logged in via Facebook
"The Obama ground game is nothing to sniff at."
Indeed: slight issue of burying the lead on this one. If you want to talk about ground games, it's important to consider the relative strengths of the two campaigns. Go to Romney's and Obama's campaign websites: you'll see, for instance, that Romney is getting substantially "out-organised" in key states.
In Ohio, which Romney probably needs to win if he is to have any chance of snatching victory, Romney has 36 field offices. Sounds okay until…
Read moreMichael Shand
Michael Shand is a Friend of The Conversation.
Software Tester
Weak Article, you basically said that romney is running a good ground game but Obama is also running a good ground game....hip hip hooray for the insights
I'm sure the Author could do better than this if they wanted to, avoided any and all policy that might affect the ground game, mentioned advertisments but avoided any and all specifics, no insight as to what states are lead by which candidate, didnt even mention the names of the swing states.
Basically I felt this article was devoid of content, and that the 2 comments above me have more substance than the article