Dazzling or deceptive? The markings of coral reef fish

Have you ever wondered why coral reef fishes are so brilliantly coloured and bizarrely patterned? A quick flick through any coral reef fish guide will leave you bewildered and awed. To answer this question, we need to think about what animals, in general, use their colour patterns for. There is, in…

M67wscnx-1361404397
How and why have the colour patterns of coral reef fish changed over time? David Cook

Have you ever wondered why coral reef fishes are so brilliantly coloured and bizarrely patterned? A quick flick through any coral reef fish guide will leave you bewildered and awed.

To answer this question, we need to think about what animals, in general, use their colour patterns for. There is, in fact, a range of uses: for instance, many must have patterns that are both eye-catching to would-be mates but also appear cryptic to lurking predators.

My colleagues, Dr John Fitzpatrick at University of Manchester, UK, Dr Sami Merilaita at Abo Akademi University, Finland, and I, recently used a “comparative approach” to try to unravel the mystery behind the evolution of spots and stripes in butterflyfishes in our original research, published today in Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

We tested a number of predictions about how these markings should evolve if they help butterflyfishes avoid being eaten.

So, what significant questions were we able to answer?

Can your colour patterns help you avoid being eaten?

Camouflage is a well-known way for prey to avoid being eaten, but it is not the only tactic. Striking markings such as spots and stripes can deceive or dazzle predators to foil attempted attacks.

Markings such as spots and eyespots (circles with a ring around the outside) are a particular source of intrigue for biologists and are common in a number of animals, including coral reef fishes.

Painting of a hypothetical butterflyfish. Shaun Collin

The idea that spots and eyespots might help prey to avoid being eaten by predators has been around for some time. Eyespots might intimidate or scare predators by mimicking the eyes of the predators’ enemies.

Another idea is that they deceive predators by giving the impression of a head at the wrong end of the body. While some of these ideas have gained support from studies of butterflies and moths, the role of these markings in fishes has remained a mystery.

Why have spots and stripes evolved?

One exciting way to tackle these sorts of evolutionary questions is to use a comparative approach – as we did – which allows you to link a species’ colour patterns with its ecology, while taking into account shared ancestry (because closely related species are more likely to resemble one another).

We obtained phylogentic data (showing the evolutionary relationships among species) on the butterflyfish family from original research published by Professor David Bellwood and colleagues at James Cook University. We then collected data on the colour patterns and ecology of each species by examining fish guide books, orginal research papers and online resources.

To our surprise, we found little support for the idea that spots provide protection from predators. But we noticed that fish with spots and eyespots always had eye stripes. These markings obscure the eye, perhaps diverting attention away from the eye and towards the spot or eyespot.

Have stripes evolved for multiple purposes?

When we looked at the evolution of striped patterns, we found species that were often found in shoals had fewer stripes.

Perhaps shoaling species tend to inhabit open water where their lack of patterning allows them to be camouflaged against the plain background. We also found that butterflyfish with broad diets tended to have more stripes.

If stripes work to break up the fish’s body outline, maybe these markings allow fish to expand their feeding activity to a greater number of habitats. There are many possible explanations for our findings, not all of which are related to predator defence.

Saddle butterflyfish as seen in Taiwan. Vincent Chen

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

One of the most important things to remember when studying the patterns and colours of animals is that animals have very different visual systems to humans. In fact, many fish may have a system of colour vision that is far more complex than our own.

An influential paper published in 2000 by Professor Justin Marshall at The University of Queensland illustrates this key point. Professor Marshall showed patterns that appear bright and bold to us might actually appear rather drab to fish, particularly if they are viewed from a distance.

One future challenge is to figure out how patterns such as spots and stripes appear when viewed through the eyes of the fish. Only then can we start to understand and explain the astonishing diversity of reef fish colour patterns.

Sign in to Favourite

Want to follow The Conversation?

Sign up to our free newsletter to get the day's top stories in your inbox each morning, with a special wrap on Saturday.

Spinner
Donate and become a friend of The Conversation

Join the conversation

10 Comments sorted by

  1. Mat Hardy

    Lecturer in Middle East Studies at Deakin University

    Would there be any similar mechanism at work as the dazzle camouflage employed on ships in the two world wars? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dazzle_camouflage

    That is, the cammo is not there really to blend in with a background, but rather to confuse the calculations of an attack vector by a predator? The idea of the ship dazzle camouflage was not to be invisible, but to make it difficult for U-boats to make an accurate assessment of bearing, speed and the ''edges" of a target vessel. Perhaps when predator fish attack in quick lunges, something similar could be at play?

    report
    1. Jennifer Kelley

      Postdoctoral Research Fellow at University of Western Australia

      In reply to Mat Hardy

      Hi Matt, thanks for the comment.

      Yes, the idea of dazzling colouration has been tried in the military (sine the 1900s) and works on exactly the same principle - that certain high-contrast markings such as stripes make it very difficult to determine the speed and trajectory of an object.

      Something similar could be at play with predator vision and prey colouration, but we need to work out how moving patterns would appear from a predator's visual perspective. There have been some experiments with humans using computer simulations, see:

      http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/275/1651/2639.short

      However, we need to work out how to do this with other animals in their natural environment. It's an exciting area of future research!

      report
    2. Mat Hardy

      Lecturer in Middle East Studies at Deakin University

      In reply to Jennifer Kelley

      Perhaps while you are at you might determine the best way for me to get fish to actually take my hooks? That is of much greater interest!

      report
  2. Dale Bloom

    Analyst

    The greater the depth, the less sunlight can penetrate into salt water.

    Coral species normal change colour as the depth increases, and so do fish that live at lower depths.

    Below about 20 feet, most corals and fish have minimal colour.

    report
    1. Jennifer Kelley

      Postdoctoral Research Fellow at University of Western Australia

      In reply to Dale Bloom

      Yes, the intensity and composition of light changes with depth, with short and long wavelengths of light being absorbed first.

      We did think about testing whether the colours of butterflyfishes change with depth, but we decided to focus on body patterns instead.

      report
    2. Dale Bloom

      Analyst

      In reply to Jennifer Kelley

      Colour is reflected visible light, and body markings may be a way for members of one species to quickly visually tell who belongs to their same species, and who doesn’t.

      Fish must also be able to tell who belongs to their same species at night, and for this they cannot use visible light or eyesight.

      My only thoughts are that they must use scent, or perhaps they can detect the body movements of nearby fish who are of the same species.

      Very sophisticated sensory systems.

      report
  3. Baron Pike

    logged in via Facebook

    What you've overlooked is the use of camouflage by predators as often as it's used defensively by prey. All fish are both predators and prey depending on the circumstances at hand. Fish also use deceptive decorations to outsmart their rivals for mating purposes and to outsmart the fish that they mate with as well. There are no fish in the ocean that don't use a myriad of deceptive tactics constantly for a myriad of reasons.

    report
    1. Jennifer Kelley

      Postdoctoral Research Fellow at University of Western Australia

      In reply to Baron Pike

      Yes, you are absolutely right, the same tactics that are used by prey are also used by their predators. Many researchers are guilty of focusing on the antipredator adaptations of prey rather than those of the predators. Luckily, this does not apply to our study as butterflyfishes are not piscivores.

      It would be good to see how camouflage relates to hunting style in predatory species - e.g. ambush predators versus active hunters.

      report