Trans fats – they’re in our chips, bakery goods, popcorn and cakes. We know we should avoid them, but what exactly are they, and why are they so bad for us?
First, let’s take a step back and look at how trans fats fit into the two broad categories of edible fats: saturated and unsaturated.
What are saturated fats?
Saturated fats have a stable chemical composition – they’re solid at room temperature and oxidise slowly. Because they’re very stable and feel good in the mouth, they’re commonly added to processed foods.
Health wise, saturated fats raise the level of cholesterol in the blood. And in large quantities they can increase your risk of heart attacks and strokes.
Animal fats – cream, butter and milk – tend to be at least a half saturated fat. Plant products, such as coconut oil and palm oil, contain saturated fats, as do many prepared foods.
What are unsaturated fats?
The chemical composition of unsaturated fats is much less stable. They’re liquid at room temperature, which makes them more difficult to use.
From a health perspective, they actually lower blood cholesterol.
Fats from most oilseeds, avocado and nuts are unsaturated.
What are trans fats?
Trans fats are variants of unsaturated fats, which have been chemically altered to improve their physical characteristics. They’re produced industrially to harden fats and oils.
Low levels of trans fats are also found naturally in cow fat and milk.
When trans fats were first introduced to food production over 50 years ago, they were considered miraculous because they allowed a liquid oil to be converted to a solid spread without the adverse effects of saturated fat on blood cholesterol.
The original US studies of trans fats didn’t show any elevation of blood cholesterol, so they were thought to be a healthier option.
What makes trans fats harmful?
By the 1990, research by Mensking and Katan showed trans fats elevated the harmful LDL cholesterol by about a tenth more than regular unsaturated fat.
And compared with other fats, trans fats didn’t have the benefit of elevating the protective HDL cholesterol. Mensink and Katan concluded that trans fats were worse for heart disease than the equivalent amount of saturated fat.
This was shown convincingly by Walter Willett in his 1993 study of US nurses. Those who reported eating a large amount of trans fats (more than 5.7 grams a day) were around two-thirds more likely to have a heart attack than nurses eating less than 2.4 grams a day.
Trans fats from dairy and beef fat (“natural” trans) were not linked to heart disease risk.
How are trans fats regulated internationally?
In 2004, Denmark was the first country to ban industrially-produced trans fatty acids at a level of more than 2% of total fat. But it’s too early to tell if this has had an effect on heart disease rates.
The United States took a different approach and mandated the labelling of trans fats on food packaging in 2006. This encouraged manufacturers to question the inclusion of trans fats in their food and many removed the product so they didn’t have to make this declaration.
New York state implemented a partial ban on trans fats in restaurants in 2006, with the ban fully in place in 2008. California and at least a dozen other jurisdictions followed suit, as did Switzerland and Denmark in 2008.
How much trans fats do Australians consume?
Margarines containing trans fats were withdrawn in 1997 and trans fat intake has subsequently declined to a few grams per day.
But even in the 1990s, Australians' intake of trans fat was relatively low, averaging 3.5 grams a day in groups at high risk of heart attacks.
We eat a lot more saturated fat than trans fat.
Do you expect Australia will regulated trans fats?
Several high-fat foods – pies, pasties, sausage rolls, quiches, bagels and donuts – contain more than 4% trans fats.
Although these foods would generally be regarded as unhealthy because of their saturated fat content, it’s important consumers have the option of choosing trans fat-free varieties.
At the very least, trans fats should be labelled so consumers can make their own choice.
Banning trans fats probably isn’t required because labelling would serve the same purpose, but with less administrative burden.
Trans fats are much more harmful to health than saturated fat and should be avoided as much as possible.
Margo Saunders
Public Health Policy Researcher
You suggest that, although "high-fat foods – pies, pasties, sausage rolls, quiches, bagels and donuts – contain more than 4% trans fats", consumers should "have the option of choosing trans fat-free varieties" and "trans fats should be labelled so consumers can make their own choice". There is ample evidence to suggest that consumers with the highest consumption of these products (such as blue-collar males and other consumers driven by cost, convenience and habit, if not limited options from local take-aways) are those least likely to have the opportunity or the inclination to make a healthy 'choice'. There is really no longer any justification for Australia to do anything other than put food manufacturers on notice that trans fats will be phased out.
Donncha Redmond
Software Developer
re: Saturated Fats & CVD, a huge meta-analysis (340,000 people) showed no relation between saturated fat intake and risk of CVD.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20071648
Conclusion: A meta-analysis of prospective epidemiologic studies showed that there is no significant evidence for concluding that dietary saturated fat is associated with an increased risk of CHD or CVD. More data are needed to elucidate whether CVD risks are likely to be influenced by the specific nutrients used to replace saturated fat.
Rosemary Stanton
Nutritionist & Visiting Fellow at University of New South Wales
Good article, Peter. I support labelling of trans fat (highlighted in red to make it noticeable), but it won't entirely solve the problem because not all sources of trans fat come in foods carrying a label. It may work well for packaged products because companies will want to stick a 'no trans' claim on their label. It won't work for some commercially fried foods where the frying 'oils' (actually solid white fat that comes in a box) contain over 40% trans fat. Some fast food companies have responded…
Read moreNada Pavlak
logged in via LinkedIn
http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/consumerinformation/transfattyacids.cfm
Food Standards Australia New Zealand’s (FSANZ) dietary modelling has found that Australians obtain on average 0.5 per cent of their daily kilojoules from TFAs and New Zealanders on average 0.6 per cent. This is well below the WHO recommendation. It is also below the levels in many other countries.
I think that there are no plans to label trans fats in Australia - but its been some time since I've worked in this area, so I'm not up with the latest, but the FSANZ and DAFF websites are an excellent source of information.
I think that talking about how trans fats are regulated internationally - and only mentioning a few of your favourite countries does not present a good picture of how international food standards and regulations work - to find tha tout you should check out http://www.daff.gov.au/agriculture-food/codex!!!
Rosemary Stanton
Nutritionist & Visiting Fellow at University of New South Wales
Unfortunately, 'modelled average consumption' does not tell the whole story. Many foods still contain trans fat (Choice has published data showing it in chicken nuggets, donuts, crackers, snack foods and other items) and it is also present (at levels up to 40%) in some commercial frying fats. Major fast food companies have changed their frying fats but the high trans fats are still available and used by smaller operators. Without labelling, a person can unwittingly take in much more than the modelled…
Read more