Field of nightmares: gamba grass in the Top End

Stretching across the north from Broome to Townsville, Australia’s tropical savannas are the largest, least-degraded savannas on Earth. While fire management, pastoralism, mining, and the decline of native mammals are among the major threats facing our savannas, it is a simple grass, gamba grass, that…

B5x37px8-1360889609
Introduced as food for cattle, gamba grass burns in a way that threatens northern Australia’s ecosystems. AAP Image/CRC for Weed Management

Stretching across the north from Broome to Townsville, Australia’s tropical savannas are the largest, least-degraded savannas on Earth.

While fire management, pastoralism, mining, and the decline of native mammals are among the major threats facing our savannas, it is a simple grass, gamba grass, that may pose the greatest long-term threat to their future integrity.

Out of the paddock

Gamba grass is a robust perennial grass from Africa that was introduced to Australia as a pasture grass. In 1986, after much trial and error, the Northern Territory Department of Primary Industries developed a cultivar that was, in the words of their own register notes, “easily established”, “highly productive”, “drought resistant”, “adapted to seasonally wet tropics”, and “adapted to a wide range of soils”. These characteristics, desirable to DPI at the time, also made gamba grass an aggressive weed.

The first wide-spread trials of gamba grass were in the late 1980s and 1990s in several paddocks in the Top End and in the Cape York Peninsula. Even at the time of introduction there were significant concerns about gamba grass. Despite assurances that it could be safely contained within heavily grazed paddocks it quickly escaped, established and spread into native savanna.

The rate of spread of gamba grass is among the highest of any invasive plant in the world. Today it has spread widely in Cape York and there are reports of outbreaks in the Kimberley and Arnhem Land, but the most significant infestations are within 200 km of Darwin.

Over one third of Litchfield National Park, a major tourist draw 100km from Darwin, is now infested with gamba grass. Equally worrying are significant infestations along the western and southern boundary of Kakadu National Park, which will increasingly occupy park rangers as they try to keep it at bay.

Fire hazard

Gamba grass grows up to four metres tall and can produce up to five times the biomass of native Australian grasses. In the highly flammable savanna environment of Australia the combination of vertical height and high fuel loads has proved catastrophic. Quite simply, our savanna trees have evolved magnificently to cope with fire, but only if fires are frequent, low intensity and low to the ground.

Research has found that where gamba grass comprises the bulk of ground cover, the tree cover and the habitat those trees provide to our threatened native marsupials can decline by 50% in less than five years due to fire mortality.

The extensive spread of gamba grass in the Batchelor region, approximately 70km south of Darwin, has forced a re-evaluation of the fire danger index to account for higher fuel loads caused by gamba grass.

Responding to gamba grass fires has required investment in new equipment, including the helicopters, fire trucks and personal protective equipment more associated with catastrophic bushfires in southern Australia than with savanna fires up north. The associated costs of such equipment, plus the need to be on call as the number of high fire risk days increase are estimated to cost the rural fire services around Batchelor an additional $1 million per year.

Through intense fires, gamba grass also reduces the carbon stocks locked away in our vast savannas. Gamba grass is a net greenhouse gas emitter and poses a significant threat to the carbon abatement schemes that are being developed to bring employment opportunities and better fire management to the north.

A weed of national significance

With such a clear impact on the environment, personal safety, and the public budget, gamba grass is a clear candidate for status as a weed of national significance (WoNS), a federal designation which to date has come with a national strategic plan plus the money and a national coordinator role to implement the plan.

Although gamba grass was not added to the initial WoNS list in 1999, it was added to a revised list in 2012. Perversely, however, this status has been granted at a time when national discourse has shifted to austerity.

While an action plan for gamba grass exists, the Federal Government will not commit to a predefined allocation of funds for WoNS coordination so that it now appears that development and implementation of a national strategic plan will be up to the chances of successfully accessing competitive funds.

This is a false economy, as early investment in weed management saves money down the track. This goes doubly so for a species such as gamba grass, which demonstrably poses a serious risk to quality of life, economic opportunity and to our largest and most pristine biome.

Fortunately, gamba grass is only a grass. It responds well to chemical treatment (there is no need to import elephants or rhinoceroses to take care of the problem). What is lacking is the strategic vision, awareness and public will to tackle the problem now, before it gets much, much worse.

Sign in to Favourite

Want to follow The Conversation?

Sign up to our free newsletter to get the day's top stories in your inbox each morning, with a special wrap on Saturday.

Spinner
Help us have better conversations — donate

Join the conversation

10 Comments sorted by

  1. Rajan Venkataraman

    Citizen

    Dear Aaron
    Thank you for the excellent article. What a pity that we won't have to import elephants to control gamba grass! Can we import them anyway?
    :-)

    report
    1. Caroline Copley

      student

      In reply to Rajan Venkataraman

      Rajan I love elephants too. But if you know about their successional effects (changes in vegetation) they are large herbivores that are grassland promoters, and as I have said in posts elsewhere, are responsible for some of the Serengeti grasslands for example. That is, they tear out the savannah trees.
      They are King of the herbivores, of which we have an entire suite from camels down, running around the outback in millions, none of which should be there. Elephants would do one thing for sure…

      Read more
  2. Chris Owens

    Professional

    Grasses are often weedy and the cavalier attitude of the proponents of these introductions defies logic. How many cane toads, chilean needle grass, buffle grass, etc. does there have to be before we learn the lesson?

    I would like to see the people or organisations responsible for these idiotic introductions held responsible for the damage caused. If its a government, then the government has to accept the cost of eradication.

    So many stupid decisions and those responsible simply retire or move on and leave the damage for others to battle.

    report
    1. Fred Pribac

      logged in via email @internode.on.net

      In reply to Chris Owens

      Yeah - I agree with your assessment that there should be some consequence for those responsible for cavalier introductions that go wrong.

      Last year I attended some field trials of differing mixes of perennial grasses for no-tillage pasture and I remember wondering about the extensive use of exotic grasses and herbs. Being a pasture ignoramus I found it fascinating and I asked an obvious question about the possibility of weed issues for native grasslands from these exotics and the answer I recall basically dismissed my concern on the basis that it is common practice and from what I could tell the rest of the reasoning was anecdotal.

      The article here is very interesting.

      report
  3. Geoff Russell

    Computer Programmer, Author

    Do we send the bill for dealing with gamba to the cattle industry?

    Currently it gets a free ride for the 50% of bowel cancer it causes, the methane emissions, not to mention the heart disease. So yet again, we see the industry escape responsibility.

    report
  4. Christine Adams-Hosking

    Landscape Ecology and Conservation Group at University of Queensland

    Thanks for highlighting this serious environmental threat Aaron. You have outlined the gravity of the issue well.
    More awareness, vision and proactive will to tackle problems such as that of exotic grass invasions in a way that actually delivers effective results would be most gratifying.

    report
  5. Caroline Copley

    student

    Elephants I discussed in another post!
    Here I would just like to say I think the federal govt decision to get rid of the weeds CRC was rotten. We should have a separate dedicated body leading invasive species research and management in this country.
    In Victoria we have the ridiculous situation of the "priority weeds list". So that if a farm has wall to wall weeds next door, permission has to be found from some part of DPI many kilometres away in a central area, and if the weed is not a priority…

    Read more
  6. Greg Miles

    Conservation lobbyist

    Good article Aaron.

    But I reckon that your carefully chosen words do not do justice to the seriousness of the problem. I would argue that Gamba Grass is in practice, about twice as bad as the overarching 'spirit' of you article conveys!!

    But I applaud you totally for writing this story.

    report