How secure is online voting with blockchain technology?
Blockchain technology can address some weaknesses in voting systems, but not all of them – and it opens new potential vulnerabilities, too.
More than ten years since blockchains were developed, their usefulness is only just being discovered.
A line outside a polling place in Guwahati, India, April 23, 2019.
Explaining the equipment and the process by which hundreds of millions of ballots are collected and counted in India.
The March 3, 2019, elections in Estonia were well-defended against anti-democracy influences.
AP Photo/Raul Mee
An Estonian cybersecurity leader explains how her country defends itself, its society and its elections from Russian interference.
An e-ballot is less secure than one on paper.
The stability and integrity of democratic society are too important to be relegated to inherently flawed computer systems that are vulnerable to malfunctions and malicious attacks.
How confident should voters be that their ballots will be counted accurately?
AP Photo/Wilfredo Lee
Ensuring the integrity of democratic elections from hackers and electronic tampering, and boosting public confidence in democracy, isn't very difficult, nor expensive.
Australia has one of the most secure electoral systems imaginable thanks to paper ballots. Cybersecurity experts caution against e-voting.
Can they be confident their votes will count?
Russian government agents allegedly penetrated US state and county election databases. Scholars of election security offer insight and recommendations about what to do now.
Does every person’s vote count?
Researchers reveal the ways the US election system is under threat – only one of which has anything to do with Russia.
An election observer from the British High Commission in Nairobi.
African democracies are embracing electronic voting far more confidently than the West.
What’s missing for elections using technology are careful transparency and scrutiny measures to help mitigate risks and build trust.
Elections worldwide are becoming increasingly dependent on technology. But, typically, the electronic systems adopted suffer from weak transparency and scrutiny even when the outcome is challenged.
Depending on old technology.
Where problems arose, voting was generally able to keep going smoothly. But those failures serve as a warning of how bad things could get if we don't replace our voting machines soon.
How secure is your vote?
Hands with votes illustration via shutterstock.com
While voter fraud - despite recent allegations - is rare, how do we ensure the ballots we cast are counted accurately? If so, how? Our experts offer background and insight.
Is everything on the up-and-up here?
With the DNC email leak and Trump calling on Russia to hack Clinton's emails, concern about foreign meddling in the 2016 presidential election process is rising. Is e-voting the next cyber battleground?
By hand: voters use paper and pencil to cast their ballots in the 2016 Australian federal election.
There's something about seeing the ballot process take place – the vote, the count – that inspires confidence. That wouldn't be the same with any electronic voting system.
Receiving votes from the internet is the easy part. Proving that you got the right result, while keeping votes private, is an unsolved problem.
Despite years of research, nobody knows how to provide evidence of an accurate result while keeping individual e-votes private.
Old enough to break down? Electronic voting machines.
Decade-old computer equipment underpins the country's most important civic process. What happens when it breaks down?
Vote early, vote often - but if it’s not secure people won’t vote at all.
vote by Feng Yu/shutterstock.com
Online voting could boost turnout, but a flawed system could destroy faith in the voting process.
About one in four Australians are skipping the polling day queues and voting early.
More than 280,000 votes were cast online at the NSW election, which has been claimed as a new world record. The state's early vote also looks set to hit a new high, mirroring a trend across Australia.
Security experts discovered that the iVote practice server was vulnerable to tampering; after checking that the same weakness affected the real voting server, they alerted the authorities.
Vanessa Teague and Alex Halderman
UPDATED 3PM: The NSW Electoral Commission has now publicly commented on the security flaw we uncovered. But we're concerned that it does not seem to understand the serious implications of this attack.