Prime Minister Julia Gillard has thrown down the gauntlet to the states and territories as she prepares to negotiate for increased school funding as part of the government’s long-awaited response to the Gonski review.
In February Sydney businessman David Gonski recommended an additional $5 billion in school funding per year. Mr Gonski also recommended that 75% of the extra money be spent on state schools, which are responsible for 66% of students.
“As a nation we should make money of this order available,” Ms Gillard told the National Press Club today, but added funding should be linked to school improvement.
“There should be no blank cheques, the money should be for better results for our students, not more jobs for bureaucrats.”
Ms Gillard said the government will now negotiate the details of school funding and the details of school improvement with the states and territories. She wants to finalise this process in time for the first meeting of the Coalition of Australian Governments next year.
“Funding should recognise that children are individuals not standardised widgets,” Ms Gillard said.
The government has set a goal to see Australian schools ranked in the top five for student performance in reading, science and mathematics by 2025. Currently Australia is ranked 7th on reading and science and 12th on mathematics.
“The average 15 year old maths student in Australia is two years behind a 15 year old in Shanghai,” Ms Gillard said, adding that four of the top five schooling systems in the world are in the Asia Pacific region.
She called on Australians to get behind a “national crusade” to ensure every child in every school gets a great education.
However the first round of funding to help reach that goal won’t commence until 2014, and there will be a six year transition period.
The government plans to legislate on the issue, introducing the Australian Education Act in 2013.
“The Australian Education Act will erect our nation’s support for a child’s education as one of the entitlements of citizenship,” Ms Gillard said.
Kevin Gould, researcher in economics of education at Central Queensland University, said today’s speech by the PM continues the saga of building hope and expectation about schooling, but delivers few details about the so-called National Plan for School Improvement.
“How does the goal of matching the world’s leading nations for schooling translate into ensuring all schools attain a high graduation rate? School funding is still up in the air.”
Earlier this year the Grattan Institute argued that only improvements in teacher training – and not increased funding – could arrest Australia’s recent slide in international numeracy and literacy rankings.
Opposition leader Tony Abbott earlier today said what’s required is better teachers, the best possible pedagogy and the right commitment to education.
“It’s not just a question of dollars,” Mr Abbott said. “There are lots of things we can do to improve our schools without just another cash splash.”
To help lift teacher quality, the government is proposing requiring more classroom experience before graduation and higher entry requirements for the teaching profession.
“Under our plan you will need to be at the top of your class to get into a university teaching course,” Ms Gillard said.
Deborah Corrigan, associate professor in Education at Monash University, said she’s disappointed with the finger pointing at teacher education.
“In so many ways we’re seen as a top quality teacher education country,” Professor Corrigan said.
She added that comparing Australia with Finland, Korea and Shanghai was not fair, given these countries were either monocultural or did not focus on the whole child.
“We need to be looking at places like Canada and New Zealand who are multicultural, who have similar contextual factors and similar goals for education and see how we rate against them.”
Professor Corrigan said while the prime minister says she is passionate about education, Australian’s don’t often get to hear good stories about teachers.
“It’s not necessarily all about the money, though that doesn’t hurt, but it is saying this is a profession that is highly valued by the community.”
The government also wants more power for principals, including over budgets and staff selection, and extra training for teachers to help them deal with bullying.
Ms Gillard said under the government’s plan every school would have a school improvement plan and would be held to account against it.
For parents, the prime minister said the My School site will deliver more information to help them see how their children are doing, including information on teacher qualifications, and how many students go on to further education or get a job when they leave school.
Matt Davis
Industralist
To attract the best people to any occupation you have to at least make it worth their while, regardless of the nobility of profession.
If The PM wants only the "..top of the class.." being eligible to make it into Teacher Training, which she stated at the NPC today, then what she's requiring seems to be nothing short of revolution of the state of current societal values. Probably not before time though too.
The economic fact of the matter is that people will inevitably follow the money. Attract the best by paying the best.
Make Teaching a desirable profession by paying Teachers more. Simple.
Peter Ormonde
Peter Ormonde is a Friend of The Conversation.
Farmer
Don't be holding your breath waiting for the funding and other details to be announced. This is going to be a long slog. Bloody States! Damn Constitution! Accursed politics and sectional interests!
This is a multi-faceted negotiation. Gillard is very very good at that. It works by signalling where there is room to move....wiggling carrots and tipping winks. If the States are half smart they will realise what is on offer and grab it. But there are strings. It is these strings under negotiation…
Read moreJames Wookey
Paramedic
Being at the "top of the class" says nothing about a persons passion, drive or natural ability in a particular profession. It is already difficult to attract teachers to a profession where wages are low and critisim is unfairly high. Teachers are treated with an ever decreasing level of respect and are often burdened with an unreasonable level of responsibility by parents (not all, but more than enough) many of whom seem to view their child as a day to day inconvinience.
A "top of the class…
Read morePeter Ormonde
Peter Ormonde is a Friend of The Conversation.
Farmer
It's a curious magical business this "what makes a good teacher" problem isn't it?
There's a young bloke down the road from me who makes a sort of a living buying and selling and fixing things. In fact he can fix just about anything.
He is both illerate and innumerate I mean pretty much totally.
Born into a dairying family he basically worked from age 8 and school attendance was sporadic to non-existent. He never finished primary school - just slipped through the cracks. He's far from thick, has a cheeky grin and a quick witted sense of verbal humour.
But you see him step into a strange sort of professional mode when he is showing me how to do something - how to strip down an engine, how to put in a new set of shock absorbers, how to sharpen a chainsaw ... clear precise and patient explanations of what, why and how. Really quite excellent teaching skills and delivered with uncharacteric seriousness and forethought. A natural.
Funny what you can learn in the bush.