While we think of junk food marketing as something that happens during television commercial breaks or on massive billboard signs, supermarkets are yet another advertising frontier for food companies.
There are myriad techniques that entice shoppers and appeal to children when visiting the supermarket: promotional signs at eye level, confectionery within easy reach at the checkout, and colourful packages with cute characters and movie tie-ins. And it’s usually well-known food companies with big advertising budgets that can afford to market this way.
Because these marketing techniques occur at the point of sale, there’s a much stronger chance they’ll lead to a successful sale than if a child sees an advertisement for junk food in their own home.
Currently, almost a quarter of Australian children are overweight or obese, and a high proportion of them will grow up to be overweight or obese adults. Given that 63% of Australian adults are already overweight or obese, it’s alarming that future generations are heading into adulthood at a higher risk of developing obesity-related illnesses.
Fighting pester power
A study by Cancer Council NSW and the University of Newcastle, published in the journal Health Promotion International, confirms just how tough it is for parents to stand up to pester power.
Nearly three-quarters of the parents in the study said they were pestered by their children into buying food, and of those who were pestered, 70% gave in and bought at least one food item. Unsurprisingly, what they were most frequently pestered for were not healthy foods but chocolates and confectionery.
Food marketing is nothing new, but marketing techniques have become more sophisticated. We know that food marketing successfully influences children – their food preferences, the food they eat and which foods they pester their parents to buy.
The food industry has been very clever to use and create well-known characters to promote food products to children. Kids see these well-known cartoon characters and movie tie-ins on the TV screen at home and recognise the same character on a sugary drink or chocolate.
No parent wants to be the one receiving looks of disdain as their three-year-old throws a tantrum at the checkout when they’re not allowed a lollipop. Most just want to get on with their shopping as quickly as they can. So when they hear that small voice asking, nagging – and sometimes screaming – for something, it’s often easier to give in.

Winning the battle
Yes, parents are responsible for the healthy diet of their children. Parents can restrict the level of television their children watch, provide them with healthy food choices and make sure they get plenty of exercise. But all this good parenting is directly undermined by the efforts of advertisers.
Food companies have millions of dollars invested in advertising and in 2010, the Australian food industry spent more than $400 million on marketing, making it the seventh-largest advertising industry. Parents can only say no and battle against this for so long without giving in.
So, what can be done?
First, the government needs to support parents by stepping in and shielding children from excessive advertising. This cannot happen without stronger advertising regulations. Recent research from the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney has shown that since the introduction of the current voluntary industry initiatives, we’ve seen little or no change to the amount of unhealthy foods being advertised.
The government has a responsibility to introduce new regulations that food advertisers must abide by and have meaningful sanctions applied should they breach them.
Second, supermarkets can play a role in supporting parents by creating an environment that doesn’t encourage and facilitate pester power. Supermarkets can make small changes such as introducing healthy foods at checkouts and removing confectionery and unhealthy food promotions that are especially appealing to children from the ends of aisles. This would help to reduce children’s desire to pester for these foods.
Supermarkets need to support those who support them – and this means helping parents to be the good guys in the pester power battle.
This article was co-authored by Sarah Campbell from the University of Newcastle’s School of Psychology.
James Jenkin
EFL Teacher Trainer
Hi Kathy and Erica, intuitively it makes sense to remove the temptation at checkouts.
I was wondering how effective such public health initiatives to combat obesity have been. Has this particular approach been tried elsewhere, and did it work?
Mark Amey
logged in via Facebook
Our local supermarket has one 'child friendly' checkout, that is lollie free. Instead, it has a huge cabinet of soft drinks!
Bec Pakes
logged in via Facebook
In my local supermarket, the bread aisle is opposite the lolly aisle. They know what they're doing, these marketing people.
Julie Leslie
GIS Coordinator
Or you could shop online and get it delivered and only occasionally step into a grocery store.
Or shop at a more traditional fruit and vege shop where there is not quite so much crap food. Then go to the butcher etc.
But that would require planning on behalf of the person
Sean Manning
Physicist
A friend of mine taught me a great tactic. He let's his kids touch and play with all the chocolates at the isle or counter but never buys any. That way the stock is eventually damaged. If everyone did this they'd have to take them away.
John Wright
Director
Or you could learn to parent!
Which should include proper nutrition for the family. If you look at many of shopping trolleys it is clear pester power is not limited to the checkout, nor is the advertising pull limited to children.
The most disappointing part of this article is the expectation that as parents we must defer to 'nanny' a.k.a the government to step in - because as parents we can't cope.
Both Julie and Sean make valid observations - but really if we can't say no to a bar of chocolate what are going to do when it is something important like schooling, alcohol or drugs.
Mark Amey
logged in via Facebook
I agree, John, it must be difficult to say 'no' to that bar of chocolate at the checkout, when the trolley is full of Coke, lollies, sweet sugary breakfast cereals, and the like, whilst being almost devoid of fruit and vegetables (unless they accidentally occur as french fries or chips).
There was a case reported in the local papers, regarding a family in a poorer area nearby. The mother had responded to the advertising regarding the value of vegetables by purchasing hash browns, peas and mashed potatoes from a well known burger place, or, made sure she got the burger every night with a 'healthy' salad, for her kids. The sad thing is that the paper reported the whole thing as a comedy...'poor dumb woman!'
I'm sure she's not alone.
Bec Pakes
logged in via Facebook
I only recall one really bad lolly-tantrum my son threw at 3 years old. I hauled him bodily out of the supermarket, while he screamed without getting anything! What surprised me is that I got a lot of frowns from people on the way out.
He's older now and knows that if he's really good he might get a lego minifig ($5), or a $2 plastic toy, which at least stops him asking for junk food.
Of course he gets nothing if he misbehaves.