Despite pages and pages of proposed amendments, not a single one was passed.
Brexit has exposed the weaknesses of the British political system – not its strengths.
The government has set out its thinking on Brexit. So what have we learned?
After all the build up, you'd have been forgiven for expecting something a bit more impressive from parliament's debate on triggering Article 50.
It's only two lines long, but this piece of parliamentary business could cause a lot of trouble.
Holyrood won't get a veto, but the Supreme Court has done the union no favours.
It's not the end of Brexit but parliament could give the government a rough ride.
Great expectations or much ado about nothing?
Under the Tudors, parliamentary sovereignty became paramount.
The court has a big constitutional decision to make in the appeal over who can trigger Article 50. But it may not be properly equipped to make it for the whole of the UK.
Nearly six months on from the UK's shock vote, there looks very little room for manoeuvre in negotiations.
We know there has to be an act of parliament but there's all to play for when it comes to what's actually in it.
How the Article 50 judgment kicked a hornets' nest.
The legal challenge over parliament's role in trigging the Article 50 process is misplaced.
The new battle lines on how to leave the EU have been drawn.
Two Germans, a Frenchman and a Belgian: who to watch as negotiations with the UK begin.
How to shift those stubborn opinion polls?
Theresa May is wise to play the long game when it comes to negotiating the UK's exit from the EU.
If Brexiters thought that making new international tariff deals and joining the WTO would be a cakewalk, they're in for a shock.
There is debate among lawyers on whether the process for a Brexit, once begun, can be stopped.