Google’s Chromebook Pixel: The tipping-point for the cloud laptop?

In a departure from the usual hype that surrounds product announcements these days, Google last week announced in an almost understated fashion, its first foray into manufacturing laptops. Despite the lack of fanfare, Google’s Chromebook Pixel is actually quite a remarkable device and will certainly have Microsoft and Apple considering carefully the consequences of Google’s move into this area.

Google Chromebook Pixel http://www.google.com.au/intl/en/chrome/devices/chromebooks.html

The most notable features of the Pixel are a high resolution and touch-enabled screen, built in 4G connectivity, and the choice of its operating system, Google’s Chrome OS. This is not the first bit of hardware that Google has built, but unlike the Nexus range of phones and tablets which Google developed in collaboration with other manufacturers, with the Pixel, Google has chosen to go it alone.

The use of Chrome OS continues Google’s support for a dual approach to its operating systems and its continued commitment to the cloud-based system. Chrome OS received a recent boost with HP’s release of the Pavillion 14 Chromebook. HP joined Lenovo, Samsung and Acer in supporting this platform. Chrome OS is built around the Chrome browser. There is no local storage on the computer with everything being stored on the Internet. In fact, with the Pixel, Google is providing 1TB of storage online for 3 years.

The advantages of Chrome OS are that the system is simple to operate, loads very quickly, is secure and is simple to update. It is likely also that it will be more secure than Mac OS X and Windows, although as Apple Mac users are now discovering, once malware writers target a platform, nothing is really that secure.

In some ways the Pixel is not that radical a laptop. Its use of USB 2 ports and Bluetooth 3 seems outdated as the newer versions of these standards are becoming standard. However, this should not lead anyone to underestimate the impact this laptop will have on the tech marketplace.

Like Microsoft, Google is increasingly turning to manufacturing its own hardware alongside partner organisations but unlike Microsoft, seems to be doing so comfortably. The devices that both Microsoft and Google are producing are showing a level of innovation that is highlighting Apple’s general lack in this area in recent times. Apple is now lagging both Microsoft and Google in not supporting touch screen laptops. Its advances in equipping laptops with high resolution displays is now passé. Google’s Pixel supports a higher pixel resolution screen than the retina displays in Apple’s Macbook Pros.

The other likely impact of the release of the Pixel is likely to be felt by Microsoft who is still struggling to convince people of the need to upgrade to Windows 8. Google’s Chrome OS provides in many ways the ideal corporate computing platform. As more and more enterprise application become web-enabled and companies increasingly move to the cloud, Google’s OS is really the true definition of a cloud OS, ideally suited to that environment. Increasingly, Google is becoming a credible alternative to Microsoft in the corporate computing world.

If Google does face a challenge with the Pixel, it is in sorting out its supply issues. Its latest Nexus phones and tablets are still in short supply. In Australia, the Nexus 4 phone appeared briefly for sale on the Harvey Norman online store and is slated to ship in mid-march from Google’s own store. Chromebooks are next to impossible to source with Samsung’s Chromebook on backorder. Of course, if Google goes ahead with its rumoured plan to open retail stores, there may be a location where the public could actually see the devices that are impossible to buy.

This is where Apple does excel over both Google and Microsoft when it comes to hardware. Not only can it create a demand for its devices, but it can rapidly supply those devices into the hands of the public. Perhaps however, this will eventually play in Google’s favour. Apple’s current ubiquity is working against it in creating an exclusive brand. Everyone has a Mac and an iPhone. If you really want to stand out from the crowd, getting ahold of a Google Chromebook Pixel would be the best way to start.

Join the conversation

16 Comments sorted by

  1. Andrew Hedge

    logged in via Twitter

    2 things that rather undermine David Glance's point:

    1) There is no way that Google will suffer the same supply issues that plagued the Nexus 4 if they don't drop the price by around $US500 for the Chromebook Pixel. They'll be lucky to sell more than a few units at $US1229 to $US1449. Where Nexus 4 was incredibly cheap by market standards, this is very high. I shudder to think what they'll charge Australians. Which brings me to my next point....

    2) Google has never offered any variant of the Chromebook range (4 previous models) to the Australian market, and has said repeatedly that they don't intend to in the foreseeable future.

    "If you really want to stand out from the crowd, getting ahold (sic) of a Google Chromebook Pixel would be the best way to start."

    Even if I wanted to spend that much on a PC, Google have made it pretty darned difficult for this Australian to do so.

    report
    1. David Glance

      Director, Centre for Software Practice at University of Western Australia

      In reply to Andrew Hedge

      Technically the article is intended for a global audience and whilst you are right about Australia, in the UK at least Chromebooks are selling reasonably well (the cheaper variants).

      I am still an optimist that once Google sorts out how to manufacture in volume and support the product globally it wil expand its markets - it pretty much has to if it wants to be a serious player in this area. In the meantime, Australians will have to resort to the usual techniques of buying things on the "gray market" or getting someone to send one over from the US.

      Regarding price - retina MacBook Pros start at $1500 in the US and don't include 4G, 1TB online storage etc - however, I guess the question is whether this is for the consumer or business market - I think the greatest application will be in the corporate sector.

      report
  2. Dan Nolan

    logged in via Twitter

    1. Not available in Australia (at this time)
    2. For how much it costs you're better off buying a 13" Macbook Air or a Retina Macbook Pro
    3. I honestly can't see any need for this outside of testing for high-DPI assets on sites
    4. Apart from text the internet is a sub optimal experience with high res displays if sites don't have high-DPI assets (very, very few sites do)

    report
  3. John Pickard

    Eclectic naturalist

    Hi David,

    I can't comment on the virtues or otherwise of this new toy. I'm still stuck trying to transer emails from Outlook Express on Windows XP 32 bit to Live Mail on Windows 7 64 bit; and to me clouds are harbingers of rain, not somewhere to store my data.

    But I am somewhat curious about the lack of the usual disclosure statement that seems to be mandatory on The Conversation, and certainly appears on all your other pieces.

    I assume this was just an oversight by both you and the editors, but the coincidence of the omission and this being your first piece focussing on how good the Pixel is, made me wonder.

    report
    1. David Glance

      Director, Centre for Software Practice at University of Western Australia

      In reply to John Pickard

      Hi John,

      There isn't a specific disclaimer on the column posts but I don't work for, or profit from, Google (sadly). I did work for Microsoft in the US for 3 years though - but that was a positive experience.

      I am intrigued by new forms of computing and for me the Pixel represents a "paradigm" whose time may have come. Also, it has highlighted that no one company has a preserve on innovation - certainly not Apple at the moment

      report
    2. John Pickard

      Eclectic naturalist

      In reply to David Glance

      Hi David,

      Don't worry, I didn't really think that you worked for Google. I was just intrigued by the lack of the disclaimer. As I said, it appears on all your earlier posts.

      As for the new paradigm, I'm not sure that I'm ready to embrace it. I can see the advantages of the cloud, but I simply don't trust anyone with years of my data etc. This is obviously a bit silly as there are now any number of sites out there with all sorts of stuff about me from when I've been forced to provide it (and…

      Read more
    3. Gavin Moodie

      logged in via LinkedIn

      In reply to John Pickard

      My experience resonates with John Pickard's.

      Rather than giving me everything and making me find a way of ignoring most I'd prefer applications to start very basically and give me the capacity to identify and add new functions I want (rarely need).

      My concerns about the cloud are somewhat different: that they may go away. I want to be able to access my files all the time. It would be too frustrating not to be able to look up a table or run an application that doesn't otherwise need an internet connection because it is available only in the cloud and I don't then happen to have access to the net at the time.

      report
    4. John Pickard

      Eclectic naturalist

      In reply to Gavin Moodie

      Hi Gavin,

      Yes indeed. If someone can tell me how to connect to the cloud WITHOUT a satellite phone when I'm doing field work in the middle of nowhere with no mobile coverage, then I might (repeat might) be interested.

      report
  4. Gavin Moodie

    logged in via LinkedIn

    Do I understand correctly that the Pixel doesn't work (fully) unless connected to the net? If so, that rules it out for me.

    report
    1. David Glance

      Director, Centre for Software Practice at University of Western Australia

      In reply to Gavin Moodie

      Hi Gavin,

      There are a range of apps that work offline including email - this is like using gmail in your browser at present - you can also read files off an attached memory card so could watch movies on the plane for example

      report
    2. Simon Arthur

      Reader

      In reply to David Glance

      The real problem is, as I understand, a lack of any fast-access non-volatile memory in the device. Sure you can probably use external memory devices, but that really defeats the purpose of having a "tablet" style computer. As the cost of solid-state "Flash memory" drives are falling dramatically, I find it puzzling why there isn't at least some amount of non-volatile storage that would allow a smoother operating experience. You wouldn't need TB's of storage, but a something to keep highly-used documents locally would be beneficial and much kinder on the ISP charges.

      Besides, I'm quite skeptical of having overseas companies having full access to my data. Google hasn't exactly been known to play by the rules.

      report
    3. Gavin Moodie

      logged in via LinkedIn

      In reply to Simon Arthur

      Thanx Simon, that's helped me understand Google's tablet much better.

      report
    4. Simon Arthur

      Reader

      In reply to Simon Arthur

      Couldn't retract my comment above, maybe I should've looked up the official specs first:
      Memory: 4GB DDR3 RAM
      Storage: One terabyte Google Drive cloud storage for three years
      32GB solid state drive (64GB on LTE model)

      So it *Should* allow you to store some important files locally and view/work on them offline.

      report
    5. Gavin Moodie

      logged in via LinkedIn

      In reply to Simon Arthur

      That looks much more convenient. What happens to the rest of one's stuff in the cloud after 3 years?

      report
  5. Pat Armstrong

    Graphic Designer

    So — a $1299 web browser in a nice-looking enclosure. No thanks!

    report
  6. Yoron Hamber

    Thinking

    I think the point is.

    Do you trust Google to be on your side?
    Or on the government?

    If you upload sensitive info, and giving me some Gigs to go through, creating a 'profile' of you, I promise it will become 'sensitive' to you.

    Doesn't mean that it will be in any way correct though, but it may be what make a government act. On the other side, Apple stinks.

    report