Most couples who seek reproductive assistance are sub-fertile, rather than sterile, and may conceive naturally. But for this to to be optimised, they need to accurately time intercourse on the fertile days of the menstrual cycle.
Even for women who have a regular menstrual cycle, the timing of fertile days can be variable. There are three generally accepted methods for women to recognise the fertile days of the menstrual cycle: the rhythm (when you estimate the timing of your fertile window), temperature (based on a temperature rise associated with ovulation and mucus (based on the presence of cervical mucus in relation to a maturing egg) methods.
Most women use the rhythm approach but this is accurate only for around a third of them. Only the temperature and mucus methods are accurate enough to work with for the purpose of getting pregnant. But they often require skilled education for correct use.
Assisted reproductive technology
Infertility affects around one in six couples in Australia, and they often turn to clinics for reproductive assistance. One in every 35 babies born in Australia is a result of reproductive assistance. In some countries the figure is higher – in Denmark, for example, it’s one in 16 babies.
But assisted reproduction technology (ART) is expensive and its success rate remains low. Most couples require multiple treatment cycles before having baby. And not all couples who are having trouble conceiving can access or wish to use reproductive technology for religious, personal and financial reasons.
Most couples having trouble conceiving are sub-fertile (rather than sterile) and may conceive naturally. Research shows that accurately timed intercourse within the fertile days of the menstrual cycle may reduce the time it takes a couple to get pregnant.
The research
We surveyed 204 infertile women seeking fertility assistance at ART clinics. Our intention was to get an idea of women’s knowledge about the fertile days in their menstrual cycle. The questionnaire was completed by women over six months and all the participants had failed to conceive after 12 or more months of trying be.
We found that most women (87%) having trouble conceiving actively try to improve their knowledge of the fertile days of the menstrual cycle, but only 13% accurately identify these days. So there’s clearly a significant gap between what women want to know about their fertile days and what they actually know.
While most women had either no knowledge (12%) or poor knowledge (53%), 68% believed they had accurately timed intercourse. The three most frequent sources of the information were the internet, books and general practitioners.
Given that pregnancy is only possible after intercourse within the fertile days of the menstrual cycle and that the menstrual cycle can be highly variable between women, there should clearly be a greater emphasis on educating women.
Knowledge and medicalisation
The problem is that information acquired from the internet, books and short appointments with general practitioners may be difficult or not well presented enough to understand. Such information is even less straightforward for women with common medical conditions, such as polycystic ovary syndrome.
The exact extent to which infertility could be reduced through improved health literacy in primary health care is not known but thought to be substantial, especially in the case of sub-fertile women. What we do know with certainty is that an increasing body of evidence suggests unnecessary medicalisation in health care not only wastes vast amounts of money, but can also do harm.
Indeed, the increasing use of specialist interventions rather than appropriate and well-timed primary health care is threatening the long-term sustainability of health systems worldwide.
We are now exploring the views of general practitioners and general practice nurses about the barriers and enablers to providing accurate and apt fertility-awareness education to couples having trouble conceiving, and the best ways to deliver this. Appropriate and appropriately-timed fertility-awareness education in general practice for couples who are having trouble conceiving has the potential to save them a lot of stress and money.
Sue Ieraci
Public hospital clinician
The author has not mentioned urine test kits as a way of identifying ovulation timing. Are these not commonly used in Australia? They are easily purchased in pharmacies, much like pregnancy tests.
Dale Bloom
Analyst
“Indeed, the increasing use of specialist interventions rather than appropriate and well-timed primary health care is threatening the long-term sustainability of health systems worldwide.”
I would agree with that, and if health care costs increase, it does not necessarily improve the quality of actual health care.
“But assisted reproduction technology (ART) is expensive and its success rate remains low.”
I am perplexed as to why IVF clinics do not emphasis other options, such as careful timing of intercourse. It does suggest IVF clinics find more money can be made by carrying out IVF, than by natural intercourse between a couple..
Sue Ieraci
Public hospital clinician
Dale - I expect that the "other options" are explored by the fertility specialist prior to recommending IVF. It is usual to go through the less complex and less invasive issues measures first.
Dale Bloom
Analyst
Sue Ieraci
"Dale - I expect that the "other options" are explored by the fertility specialist prior to recommending IVF."
Your suspicions or expectations are not proven by the survey.
"We surveyed 204 infertile women seeking fertility assistance at ART clinics."
"While most women had either no knowledge (12%) or poor knowledge (53%), 68% believed they had accurately timed intercourse. The three most frequent sources of the information were the internet, books and general practitioners."
Most women had either "no knowledge" or "poor knowledge", so they were not being given adequate information according to the research. It does appear IVF clinics are more concerned with making money than making babies.
IVF clinics are a scam ripping off the taxpayer and also individuals.
Dale Bloom
Laboratory Analyst
Additionally, the article does not mention men. As half the reproductive team, perhaps men could be educated also and participate in supporting the female partner in determining the best part of the cycle.
Sue Ieraci
Public hospital clinician
Dale - I agree that the full "reproductive team" should be involved in understanding the mechanics of fertility, and bringing about conception - or not.
Either half of the reproductive team could purchase and administer the ovulation test kit. Only one half of the team can supply the urine, however.
I don't understand why the use of hormonal ovulation test kits hasn't been mentioned in the article. They are quoted as being 97% accurate in detecting a surge of the hormone LH (Luteinising Hormone) - not 100% but more reliable than the other methods quoted.
Philip Dowling
IT teacher
The issue of frequency of intercourse has not been mentioned in this article. I find this omission puzzling, as it would seem to be the simplest,cheapest solution in sub-fertile couples.
Tom Hennessy
Retired
The Shute brothers tested the effectiveness of vitamin E in fertility in the 1950's. They worked with horses because horses when they didn't conceive or had a miscarriage cost the breeders alot of money. They proved it and it became known as the "anti-sterility vitamin".
Bruce Moon
Bystander!
Kerry
How do you 'educate' women proficient in all three methods to accept that none are foolproof.
Which means that the reverse may be the case.
After four children, my wife announced that the 'decreed' abstinence each month - with increasing duration over time - had not worked. Her suggestion was a total abstinence!
Fortunately (for me) her obstetrician suggested a tubal ligation.
It appears to me that nothing is certain with (mother) nature.
Cheers
Sue Ieraci
Public hospital clinician
A question for the author: you say "What we do know with certainty is that an increasing body of evidence suggests unnecessary medicalisation in health care not only wastes vast amounts of money, but can also do harm."
How do you define "medicalisation"? Isn't a knowledge of the hormones involved in the menstrual cycle "medical knowledge"?
The science of physiology underpins a lot of medical practice. The whole idea of how ovulation and conception works, including the rise and fall of various hormones, is not intuitive - it is "medical knowledge". If not, how would you define it?
Edward John Fearn
Edward John Fearn is a Friend of The Conversation.
Hypnotherapist and Naturopath
Excellent article Kerry,
Cervical mucus and basal temperature changes are certainly not overly difficult to learn to chart. Some persistence may of course be required and as Sue pointed out ovulation test kits are available from most pharmacies.
As well as addressing the physiological factors involved in infertility, it would be unfortunate if we did not at least touch on the possible relationship between fertility and emotional stressors. Being anxious about not being able to conceive may further impact on one’s fertility.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7037462
Also the impact of hypnosis on improved IVF outcomes would also seem to further demonstrate the link between reduced emotional stresses and successful pregnancy.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16566936
Edward John Fearn
Edward John Fearn is a Friend of The Conversation.
Hypnotherapist and Naturopath
Sorry I meant to put this link in my last post.
http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(10)01031-9/abstract
Sue Ieraci
Public hospital clinician
Intersting concept, Edward, but they only controlled for three confounders: maternal age, alcohol conosumption and intercourse frequency. Also, the odds ratios were quite small, and they did not measure any serum hormones, nor correlate with actual emotional or physical "stress".
Who know from other work that other imporatna confounders include maternal smokign and obesity, amongst others.
Have you had good results from hypnotherapy? Are they published somewhere, or do you audit outcomes?
Edward John Fearn
Edward John Fearn is a Friend of The Conversation.
Hypnotherapist and Naturopath
Hi Sue
That is certainly a valid question but it does present some difficulties in giving a definitive answer.
In relation to IVF, I have had a small number of clients that I had worked with, one of whom had not responded to initial procedure, the others were awaiting the first procedure. In each case I used relaxation techniques to address associated feelings of anxiety. All these cases experienced favourable outcomes, however due to the small number of subjects I have no way of validating…
Read moreSue Ieraci
Public hospital clinician
Thanks, Edward.
If your interventions have helped with stopping smoking and reducing obesity, they clearly will have health benefits beyond fertility, even if they don't objectively impact fertility directly.
Tom Hennessy
Retired
"even if they don't objectively impact fertility directly"
Actually smoking is one of the leading causes of lack of fertility. It is called miscarriage. Lack of oxygen from poor blood flow , due to hyperviscosity from the polycythemia caused by ? smoking. You didn't know that obviously.
"Smoking--a major cause of polycythemia"
"Spontaneous abortion during the first trimester was the most common complication, occurring in 33% of patients. Overall, the complication rate was 67% in untreated pregnancies (18/27) vs none in aspirin- or interferon-treated women"
Tom Hennessy
Retired
Jeez , I was on another thread , I thought this was about smoking. Forget what I said , well , don't forget what I said , just forget I said it here.
Tom Hennessy
Retired
Polycythemia doesn't have to be high to make an obvious difference in birth outcomes.
"Medical attention may be warranted in pregnant African-American
adolescents with hemoglobin concentrations of <or=95 g/L or >120 g/L."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12840205
"What happens is that excess iron in pregnancy can drive the hemoglobin
levels above desirable levels, so that by the end of the second trimester of pregnancy, 27 percent of the non-anemic women in our study had hemoglobin levels that were undesirably high," said Fernando Viteri, MD, Scientist at Children's Hospital Oakland Research Institute (CHORI). "In these women, the risk of delivering premature babies or newborns with low birth weight quadrupled."