The U.S. Supreme Court turned its back on America’s core constitutional ideals — liberty and equality— when it erroneously ruled women have no constitutional right to abortion.
Disiplin ilmiah, gaya jurnalistik
Artikel-artikel mengenai Abortion rights
Menampilkan 21 - 40 dari 100 artikel
Barbara Kruger’s ‘Untitled (Your body is a battleground)’ has seamlessly transitioned to social media, inspiring a new generation of media-savvy artists and activists.
The next prime minister has an opportunity to make abortion rights more or less secure in UK law.
As many as 80% of young people want abortion to be legal, and most disagree with the Supreme Court’s recent Dobbs v. Jackson ruling. This could lead to high youth voting rates in the 2022 midterms.
Only 24 countries today totally ban abortion. The Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision in the US is unlikely to lead other countries to join that list.
Decision-making in the Canadian Supreme Court appears to be more fundamentally rooted in the law, not politics, than it is in the United States. Here’s why.
Differing U.S. and Canadian political and judicial systems offer Canada protections against outlawing abortion here. But there’s still a lot of work to be done to ensure reproductive justice.
The concept of body ownership shows how the Supreme Court’s decision affects every woman, whether they can get pregnant or not.
Tennessee and Wisconsin are among the states that can jail pregnant women because of illegal substance use, despite major medical groups saying that this practice isn’t effective.
The justices who decided to overturn the abortion rights precedent of Roe v. Wade explained their reasoning, and signaled other precedents could be reversed as well.
Women taking precautions to conceal their identities while seeking reproductive advice is akin to spies using tradecraft to avoid enemy agents.
Opposition Leader Christopher Luxon’s response shows he is willing to set aside personal values for what is politically expedient, choosing pragmatism over idealism.
In contrast to their reaction to gay rights or the war in Ukraine, relatively few companies have openly criticized the Supreme Court ruling ending a constitutional right to abortion.
In the wake of the US Supreme Court’s decision on Roe v Wade, it’s worth remembering that a man can benefit from the right to abortion many more times over his lifespan than a woman might.
This is more than a huge political and legal decision. Almost half of US women and girls of reproductive age live in states where abortion is – or will become – illegal.
After the ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn Roe v Wade, will more Americans travel for abortions? Inequalities created by this controversial decision will be revealed at border points.
State supreme courts have a relatively low profile in the US. That’s going to change now that they will be under political pressure to decide whether abortion is protected in state constitutions.
The Supreme Court on June 24, 2022, issued a ruling that overturned decades of constitutional abortion rights for women in the US. Scholars explain the significance of the decision.
There are 13 states with so-called ‘trigger laws’ that aim to ban abortion now that the Supreme Court has overturned Roe v. Wade. But what actually must happen for the laws to take effect?
The potential reversal of Roe v. Wade should serve as a stark warning to the power the high courts hold to transform societal conditions.
Kontributor teratas
-
Professor of Law, University of Virginia
-
Reader in Geography, Queen Mary University of London
-
Professor of Social Work, University of Tennessee
-
Professor of Law, George Washington University
-
Senior Lecturer in Politics, University of Liverpool
-
Senior Lecturer in Sociology, Aston University
-
Professor of Political Science, Hamline University
-
Assistant Professor of Sociology, University of Colorado Boulder
-
Religion and Society Professor, Universidad de Buenos Aires
-
Professor of Global Legal Studies, Birmingham Law School, University of Birmingham
-
Senior lecturer in law, Deputy Director of the Castan Centre for Human Rights Law, Monash University
-
Professor of Women's, Gender and Sexuality Studies, The Ohio State University
-
Dean of Economics, Politics & History, University of Texas at Arlington
-
Lecturer, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Nottingham
-
Associate Professor of American History and Politics, University of East Anglia
