A Trump election loss would suit NZ’s trade, climate and arms control foreign policies. But there will still be the problem of China.
Disiplin ilmiah, gaya jurnalistik
Artikel-artikel mengenai Free trade
Menampilkan 21 - 40 dari 236 artikel
Trump launched his trade war to save American manufacturing. An economist explains why it hasn’t worked out as planned.
COVID-19 has all but wiped foreign policy from the election debate, but a world still in crisis awaits the winner of the general election.
The Canada-U.S.-Mexico Free Trade Agreement, which came into force in July 2020, puts more emphasis on the environment and gives greater authority in Canada in the matter.
But they may not bring all the economic benefits that their proponents suggest.
One strategy is to give negotiators maximum deal-making power. Another is to take as much as possible away from them.
Africa has opportunities to integrate further and bring its economies into the global economy.
Although there will be some economic harm, it may be time to retreat from free trade with China and focus on our national security concerns.
African countries must take advantage of the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact to accelerate industrialisation and intra-regional trade, and improve infrastructure.
Canada’s free-trade obsession has made us overly reliant on global supply chains. That’s a huge unforced error given that 19 years ago, 9/11 showed us just how quickly border policy can change.
The US and China have reportedly agreed on a partial deal to ease tensions in the two-year old trade war. Does that mean it’s almost over? Fat chance, an economist says.
President Trump and Democrats recently agreed on a deal to pass the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement. A trade scholar explains what’s new.
A large free trade area could hinder the development of manufacturing, which countries need for economic growth.
Border closure is an implicit admission of the ineptitude and incompetence of Nigeria’s customs and immigration officers
The Trump administration’s tendency to follow rules only if they’re in its interest could end up hurting the US in the long run.
Trump’s endgame for the US-China trade war still seems elusive as the conflict continues to escalate.
As the US prepares to replace NAFTA, a labor scholar who was critical of Perot but shared concerns about the deal revisits the claim that helped him become the most successful third-party candidate since Teddy Roosevelt.
President Trump has unilaterally raised tariffs and sparked trade wars, all without consulting Congress. A century ago, the roles were reversed.
China has reportedly halted all purchases of US soybeans. Here’s why that’s going to be very painful for American farmers.
The collective public health of Canada, the United States and Mexico will take a hit if the new NAFTA becomes law.
Kontributor teratas
-
Associate Professor of Political Science, Georgia State University
-
Assistant Professor of Economics, University of California, Merced
-
School of Social Sciences, Monash University
-
Director and Professor, Australia-China Relations Institute (ACRI), University of Technology Sydney
-
Lecturer of international trade law, Monash Business School, Monash University
-
Industry Professor and Chief Economist, University of Technology Sydney
-
Regents Professor of Law and Communication and Director of the Center for Law and Intellectual Property, Texas A&M University
-
Lecturer in History, University of Exeter
-
Distinguished Professor, Arthur J. Gosnell Professor of Economics, & Interim Head, Department of Sustainability, Rochester Institute of Technology
-
Research Director, The University of Western Australia
-
Professor of Economics, UNSW Sydney
-
Associate Professor of Economics, University of South Carolina
-
Director of the Center for Latin American Studies and Professor of Letters and Science, University of California, Berkeley
-
Professor of Practice, NYU Shanghai and Fundação Dom Cabral, NYU Shanghai
-
Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Arizona
