Invertebrates are all around us – crawling, squirming and buzzing about their business. From forests canopies to ocean depths, they form about 80% of the known species on Earth. By virtue of their sheer biomass, invertebrates are the movers, shakers and ecosystem makers of our planet. A one hectare patch of Amazonian rainforest, for example, contains a few dozen birds and mammals, but well over a billion invertebrates – 93% of the animal biomass.
Despite this astonishing abundance, it is becoming increasingly clear that invertebrates are far from invulnerable to human pressures. A recently released report by the Zoological Society of London – Spineless: Status and Trends of the World’s Invertebrates – estimates that one-fifth of invertebrates are at risk of extinction. This is the same as the proportion of threatened vertebrates. However, vertebrates' plight receives vastly more attention.
It is worrying that invertebrates appear to be following the same path towards extinction as vertebrates – largely without us even noticing.
Not only do we risk losing a large component of the natural world, we are also depleting the essential foundations of healthy ecosystems upon which humans depend. Almost every marine fish that forms part of the human food chain will have fed on invertebrates at some time during its development. In terrestrial ecosystems, invertebrates perform a vast array of essential functions: they spread organic matter through soils, pollinate crops, and reprocess our waste.
The “Spineless” report reveals that freshwater species tend to be the most imperilled of invertebrates. Approximately 40% of freshwater invertebrate species are threatened by pollution, 26% by dam construction and water abstraction, and 19% by loss of habitat from residential and commercial developments.
Conservation measures to safeguard these species are severely lacking. Poor humans rely on freshwater resources, and failing to conserve these species is letting them down. Filter-feeding invertebrates, for example, play an important role in the ability of freshwater systems to self-regulate. They act as a natural water purification plant by removing phytoplankton, bacteria and organic matter from the water column.
Invertebrate conservation must succeed in the face of many challenges. Their level of diversity is bewildering, and often very little is known about their basic ecology. Many are still yet to be named or described. Complete assessments of the highly species-rich invertebrate groups is prohibitively time consuming and costly. This is particularly true in light of the current threat level, which necessitates that information be obtained as soon as possible.
But for all the difficulties facing invertebrate conservation, there are also many opportunities. A ten hectare reserve is too small for a viable population of vertebrates, but is often enough to sustain a large breeding population of an invertebrate species. Off-reserve preservation is also extremely cost effective: large numbers of invertebrate species can typically be breed in a laboratory for a fraction of the cost of a single pair of rare mammals.
The key barrier to achieving any of this, however, is getting people to care enough about invertebrates to take these steps.
Beating backboned bias
With a few striking exceptions, invertebrates are too small to really impose themselves upon our senses. And as animals get smaller, our concern for them tends to diminish.
Technology has helped to overcome this bias in spatial perspective. Through the camera lens, it is possible communicate the wonder of the invertebrate world close up. BBC’s Life in the Undergrowth, for example, weaved stunning photography and intriguing narrative to expose millions of viewers to the fascinating behaviour and life histories of invertebrates.
Invertebrates also fail to conform to human aesthetic values. They are often seen as alien and unfathomably “other” – a real hindrance when competing with cute cuddly bears and eerily evocative apes for limited conservation funds.
The “Spineless” report advocates taking a leaf out of the book of vertebrate conservationists by identifying and marketing iconic species – the “insect cheetahs” and “worm rhinos” of the invertebrate world. These flagship species could then be used to drive landscape conservation approaches that aim to cover the needs other invertebrates.
The creation of such invertebrate icons has so far met with some success. For example, efforts are underway to restore critical habitat of the much-loved Monarch Butterfly – now the subject of a feature film – in North America.
But truly engaging people in invertebrate conservation will still require a major attitudinal shift. A tiger beetle is every bit as charismatic as its mammalian counterpart, in its own way.
Building an appreciation for a diversity of life forms, even ones that scurry around on stilt-like legs and cover their prey in corrosive liquid to aid digestion, sounds like a tall order. But by limiting our interest and conservation actions to large and furry organisms, we are neglecting some of the most fascinating animals on the planet.
Filtering out the overwhelming diversity that surrounds us also creates a skewed perspective of the world in which we can’t fully appreciate our own place in an interconnected web of life – so fundamentally dependent upon “the little things that run the world.”
Michael McCarthy
ARC Future Fellow at University of Melbourne
Hi Kylie,
Thanks for writing that article.
I like how Mark Burgman and David Lindenmayer represented the importance of invertebrates in their book "Conservation Biology for the Australian Environment". They used a drawing by Kate Thompson in which the size of each organism in the picture represented the number of species. It is compelling because the vertebrates are tiny specks. I have a copy of the picture on my blog - it is quite beautiful:
https://mickresearch.wordpress.com/2012/03/09/coextinction-and-recognition-for-unloved-threatened-species/
Of course, one could draw a similar picture for biomass, or some other metric of biological importance. It would look similar, or perhaps even more compelling.
Cheers,
Mick
Jane Rawson
Editor, Energy & Environment at The Conversation
Great drawing, Mick. I'd love to see a biomass pic along the same lines...
Chris McGrath
Senior Lecturer at University of Queensland
Thanks for a super metaphor in your headline (what a great hook to draw in a reader) followed by a wonderful article.
Kylie Williams
PhD Candidate at Charles Sturt University
Thanks Chris! I cannot take credit for the excellent headline though – it was provided by my editor.
Angus Martin
Retired zoologist
Yes, great title and significant article. I also like the title of Ed Wilson's discussion of this topic in his "In Search of Nature" (1996) : The Little Things That Run the World. He concludes with: When a valley in Peru or an island in the Pacific is stripped of the last of its native vegetation, the result is likely to be the extinction of several kinds of birds and some dozens of plant species. Whereas we are painfully aware of that tragedy, we fail to perceive that hundreds of invertebrate species will also perish.
Graeme Martin
Winthrop Professor at University of Western Australia
OK! I confess ... I'm a vertebrate biologist but I nevertheless agree that we neglect the little critters to our peril. That said, a compelling argument is only the first step. Lets imagine you have convinced the world that you are right ... and you are obviously right ... what do we do? In our bid for the CRC for Safeguarding Biodiversity, we left out vertebrates. Partly because we are vertebrate biologists, partly because we needed focus, partly because we could say that repairing the ecosystem would do the trick (a cop-out?). So, Kylie, what should we do to make a difference?
Kylie Williams
PhD Candidate at Charles Sturt University
Thanks for taking the time to read and comment Graeme.
I also must confess….I specialise in freshwater vertebrate ecology. But as the role of macroinvertebrates as indicators and regulators of stream health has been increasingly highlighted, I too have realised that we ignore the little critters at our peril.
I daresay it would have been fairly impossible to put up a successful Biodiversity CRC bid that explicitly included invertebrates, because the necessary foundations have not yet been…
Read moreBeth Mantle
Collection Manager, Australian National Insect Collection at CSIRO
Hi Kylie,
Great article! I am pleased to see a compelling and (unfortunately) concerning article about invertebrate conservation.
My biggest concern is that we don't even know what kinds of invertebrates we're losing. I manage the largest collection of Australian insects in the world, and what I *do* know is that many specimens in our collection are either unidentified or unknown to science. Even worse, the expertise required to unravel these identification tangles is rapidly declining. Australia has fewer taxonomists than ever before, and yet it has never been more important to have the skills to identify and describe our invertebrate fauna.
Beth.
Kylie Williams
PhD Candidate at Charles Sturt University
Thanks Beth. I had the privilege of seeing some of the insect collection you manage while I was an intern at CSIRO and have had a soft spot for all things invertebrate ever since.
Nicholas Cooper
logged in via LinkedIn
Thanks for the great article Kylie! As a pest manager who uses IPM, low hazard and non-chemical methods, one of the strategies that we encourage people to consider is acceptance (of a few insects, not a significant infestation). We find it amazing how intolerant people are of a several insects or arachnids in and around their home. When we talk of the benefits of such creatures, we are often met with a blank stare as the home owner often considers one insect or spider as one too many.
Regards
Nick