The Labor government is not often celebrated for its policy achievements, but there has been one area where it deserves some recognition – early childhood education.
It started reforms to the sector in 2007, and has made gains towards a better quality, more accessible, affordable and integrated early childhood education system.
But given recent polls, it looks as though we could be heading for a change of government in September. With this prospective change, it seems uncertain where the reforms – far from complete – are headed.
After all, it’s a difficult policy area that needs energy and commitment, and if the political will diminishes the momentum could be lost.
In starting a conversation about this, the first point to make is that early childhood education does not stand alone; it is vitally connected with our social and economic fabric.
As US President Barack Obama said in his recent State of the Union address, quality early childhood education can help to boost graduation rates, reduce teen pregnancy and even reduce violent crime.
“In states that make it a priority to educate our youngest children… studies show students grow up more likely to read and do math at grade level, graduate high school, hold a job, and form more stable families of their own,” he said.
Neuroscience, too, has provided strong research to show that what happens in the early years sets the trajectories for later educational success.
The government in Australia then has a clear interest in providing high quality early childhood. But this is no easy task and there’s plenty of work to do.
Politically speaking, it could easily be put in the too hard basket, especially given the agenda for the reforms so far has been complex and demanding, requiring change at the national, state, and local levels of provision and practice.
So far we’ve seen the development of a National Quality Framework (NQF) which provides expectations across seven quality areas including such things as staff ratios, as well as the implementation of a national framework to guide curriculum decision making known as the Early Years Learning Framework.
We’ve also seen the establishment of a national body – the Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority (ACECQA). This body has the responsibility for ensuring accountability in all jurisdictions across Australia.
So there has been progress but the reforms are far from complete. Australia needs to do more if it is to lift its provision of equitable, high quality and affordable early childhood care and education to an international best standard.
A recent report in The Economist revealed that Australia is ranked 28 in a group of 45 countries in terms of its early childhood provision and that whilst there are many Australian early childhood centres that would be ranked as “world class”, there are big issues that remain (particularly unequal access and quality).
But at the moment, the education debate is a crowded issue and governments are focused on school funding, teacher performance, testing and rankings.
Prime Minister Julia Gillard describes the improvements needed in education as a “moral crusade”. But what does the prime minister mean here – who are the “crusaders” and what are they fighting for?
Educators working at all levels and contexts (early childhood, primary, secondary, tertiary) deserve more than slogans. Now is the time for major parties to move past slogans and show us their policies.
Never mind winning education races or fighting a crusade, both sides of politics need to focus on early childhood education to deliver a better society and economy for Australia.
Brad Farrant
Adjunct Research Fellow in Early Childhood Development at University of Western Australia
Thanks for the great article Susan.
Dale Bloom
Analyst
I think the issue of early childhood education is more political than anything.
The universities blame secondary schools for poor student performance in universities.
Then the secondary schools blame the primary schools for poor student performance in secondary schools.
Then the primary schools blame preschool education for poor student performance in primary schools.
Off course all education systems want more “government spending”, which is actually taxpayer funding.
But I have noticed throughout that no one states what taxes should be increased for this extra funding, or what areas of taxpayer funding should be reduced to give more to education.
John Perry
Teacher
Dale, it's not just the education systems that "want" the funding, it's the entire country's future that "needs" it. Why not look at it as a taxpayer "investment" in the future (ie that in the long term will pay for itself) rather than something we have to shell out for and only if we have the cash?
Dale Bloom
Analyst
A young child’s brain has not formed enough for them to learn much (eg the logic part of the brain is still forming in young children, which is why so many young children have to learn by rote or repetition.)
There is minimal evidence to suggest that early childhood education does much at all, other than getting deprived children out of their home environment, and in countries such as the US and Australia, the majority of deprived children are from single parent families.
If the country has a large number of deprived children, then early childhood education may be of some use, but of course the best system would be to vastly reduce the number of deprived children in the first place.
I have also worked outside of several schools, and I have seen when teachers arrive and leave, and in no way should teachers ever be given a pay rise, if that is what you may want.
John Perry
Teacher
You've listed a number of generalisations, Dale, which are not helpful to this discussion. I'm staggered that you would write something like:
"A young child’s brain has not formed enough for them to learn much"
Have you ever spent time with a 3, 4, or 5 year old? These children learn more quickly than anyone! That is why music, movement, and foreign language immersion activities are so useful for them. Plenty of literature around re this if you care to look.
Thank you for informing us that you have worked "outside" of schools. I have actually worked "inside" of schools and see the hard work that people "outside" the schools never see. As an example, I'm sure you didn't see a dozen of our teachers arriving for or leaving work during three days late last year, as they were all on camp with the kids - and no, no "free time" and no overtime paid, either.
Tim Keegan
Community Worker
I've worked in practical ways with both the WH&S and early childhood nation-wide 'harmonisation' reforms and think they are pretty good.
Some quality aspects were lost in the NSW regulation but I think this is balanced by having a nation-wide system that progressively introduces better quality standards and can inform parents about the quality of the service their child attends.
Whole heartedly supporting children, in the rich tapestry that is Australia, is the best chance of providing wonderful…
Read moreAlan Blackshaw
logged in via LinkedIn
I would agree that many of the changes in the National Quality Framework and associated reforms such as lower staff to child ratios are important but one of the issues not addressed by the government is that these reforms carry an increased financial burden to child care providers. Many of these providers are in reality small businesses. A change in ratios, for example, will result in a reduction in income for that business and fewer available child care places. Withoout an increase in government funding and rebates to the child care sector many of these reforms could result in more restricted child care options which is counter to the aims of the reforms.
Peter Farrell
teaching-principal at Zeerust Primary School
I can't say I have a detailed understanding of this policy area but speaking as someone who enrolls kids in my school with, and without, a kindergarten experience. I have to say, time at kindergarten makes a real and positive difference for the majority of kids we have enrolled. I would also make this qualification: Nothing replaces a parent with an active personal interest in their child's learning before they come to school, and that may not include kindergarten.