New CSIRO website shows steady rise of greenhouse gases

A new website launched today allows the public to see how greenhouse gas emissions have risen steadily over the past 35 years. The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) launched the site so members of the community can see for themselves how the climate-warming gases have…

Csirosite
CSIRO scientist Dr Paul Fraser examining air stored in the Cape Grim Air Archive. Anyone can now explore online the record levels of greenhouse gases measured in the Southern Hemisphere atmosphere since 1976. North Sullivan Photography

A new website launched today allows the public to see how greenhouse gas emissions have risen steadily over the past 35 years.

The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) launched the site so members of the community can see for themselves how the climate-warming gases have increased as a result of human activity.

“The atmospheric level of carbon dioxide, which is the most important long-lived greenhouse gas influenced by human activities, is at its highest level in more than a million years,” said Dr Paul Fraser from CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research.

“It is currently increasing at about 0.5 per cent each year.”

The website has interactive graphs showing the levels of carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide and methane. Chemicals that deplete the ozone layer are also measured, such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and halons and the site is updated monthly as new air samples are tested.

The data are taken from air samples collected by CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology at Cape Grim in Tasmania, which is thought to be a good standard of global changes in greenhouse gases because of its famously clean air.

Easily accessible and reliable data will help ensure the public has access to the facts on climate change.

“The measurements testify to a steady rise in carbon dioxide concentrations in the Earth’s atmosphere, mainly caused by the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation,” said Dr Fraser.

“The graphs we’ve made available online will enable people to examine the evidence about the major driver of recent climate change. This is fundamental information in determining the global actions needed to avoid greenhouse gases rising to dangerous levels.”

By examining ancient air bubbles trapped in Antarctic ice, scientists are also able to compare how current levels of greenhouse gases compare to levels over the last 1000 years.

Carbon dioxide is currently rising at almost 2 parts per million molar (ppm) per year, said Dr Fraser.

“Together, these measurements allow us to trace the dramatic rise in carbon dioxide levels from about 280 ppm before the start of the industrial era around the year 1800, to 388 ppm in 2010. That’s an increase of almost 40 per cent, largely due to human activities.”

Many climate scientists, including the head of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, have said that a safe level of carbon dioxide concentration would be around 350ppm.

Sign in to Favourite

Want to follow The Conversation?

Sign up to our free newsletter to get the day's top stories in your inbox each morning, with a special wrap on Saturday.

Spinner
Help us have better conversations — donate

Join the conversation

7 Comments sorted by

  1. Timothy Curtin

    Economic adviser

    The article here advertising CSIRO’s new website providing Cape Grim data on GHGs ends: “Many climate scientists, including the head of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, have said that a safe level of carbon dioxide concentration would be around 350ppm.” Actually that false claim is James Hansen’s of NASA-GISS. Pachauri the novelist and spruiker of Greenpeace’s renewable energy report that is now an IPCC document may claim the same, but the IPCC itself does not, its AR4 WG1 2007 sets no targets or ceilings at all.

    BTW, you may not be able to access the Cape Grim data, because Microsoft blocks CSIRO’s ActiveX. I have notified CSIRO’s Paul Fraser of this problem.

    report
    1. Sunanda Creagh

      Editor at The Conversation

      In reply to Timothy Curtin

      Hi Timothy,
      Thanks for the comment and note about access to the data. Yes, you're absolutely right the IPCC has not set a 'safe' level but Rajendra Pachauri (the head of the IPCC) has said he thinks the world should be aiming for around 350ppm.

      report
  2. John McLean

    logged in via email @connexus.net.au

    (Why does this seem to put my comment under the last posting rather than under the article as whole?)

    My response is .. so what? No-one has ever provided credible empiriscal evidence that elevated CO2 causes significant and dangerous warming.

    On the othe rhand, I and professors Bob Carter and Chis de Freitas showed that almost all variation in global average atmospheric temperature can be attributed to the ENSO; little remains for attribution to ther causes.

    Why should anyone be the sightest bit concerned about the CSIRO's claims?

    report
    1. Felix MacNeill

      Environmental Manager

      In reply to John McLean

      What should we read for 'empiriscal' - irrascible? - fantastical? nonsensical?

      report
  3. SustainableRenewable

    logged in via Twitter

    Of recent times we have seen a hysterical level of denial of climate change science reminiscent of the kind of madness that prevailed around the issue of whether the earth was flat during the middle ages and more recently, whether the earth was the centre of the universe, as it was "written", during the time of Galileo.

    The passion and anger... even hate that surrounds this issue can only be explained by irrational fear. Fear of change is what drives most emotional debates and this is underpinned…

    Read more
  4. Douglas Cotton

    B.Sc.(Physics), B.A.(Econ), Dip.Bus.Admin

    Under the old theory it would matter, but under John Dodds' new theory of climate change It doesn't matter. Excess CO2 (above that required to convert all the available photons) has absolutely no effect on temperature. Assuming we had more accumulated CO2 in the 12 months ending 20 June 2011 than we did in the 12 months ended 31 Dec 2003, why was the average temperature for this latest year slightly cooler than in 2003 as in this NASA plot http://earth-climate.com/2003-2011.jpg ???? The answer…

    Read more