Labor’s fall in today’s Nielsen poll will fan the leadership talk within caucus, and place enormous pressure on Julia Gillard. To put it bluntly, it’s just what the Rudd camp has been hoping for, because really bad polling is the only magic carpet on which the former prime minister could ride back into his old job.
The Nielsen poll, reported today in the Fairfax papers, shows the ALP primary vote down 5 points since December to 30 per cent. On a two party basis the Coalition leads by a huge 56-44 per cent if preferences are distributed according to how they went at the 2010 election.
Tony Abbott has risen by 9 points as preferred prime minister over the summer, while Gillard has fallen by 5 points. He leads her 49-45 per cent, the first time he has been ahead in many months.
The result shows once again that Labor is headed for an electoral disaster. It will overshadow Gillard’s $1 billion industry and innovation package, designed for the blue collar battlers.
While the full caucus won’t be back in Canberra until next month, the poll will be destabilising for the PM, who has not been able to take a trick since the political year began. It will remind many Labor MPs that they are out of kilter with the general public: more than six in ten would prefer Kevin Rudd as leader and a little over half the voters think Labor should change. People have warmed towards Rudd and change since September.
Meanwhile Rudd continues to parade his wares, despite yesterday flatly denying he has any ambition to ever return to the leadership.
In a long interview on Sky TV he again admitted to his past mistake on carbon pricing. “I made a great error of judgement in terms of the deferral of the emissions trading scheme,” he said. And, after last week shifting the blame to Treasurer Wayne Swan for the mining tax fiasco, he said: “The big debate over the mining tax, ultimately that was my call. I was the Prime Minister. Sure, other ministers, including the Treasurer, had central roles but it was ultimately my call.” A touch of humility is necessary.
But he would not say what should be done about the tax if Labor were re-elected. The Nielsen poll shows the tax, in its present form, has minimal support.
Rudd’s hefty broadsides against Abbott carried the implicit message that he would be Labor’s most effective weapon against the opposition leader. But, with some criticism in caucus ranks of his being so “out there”, Rudd has rescheduled an engagement he had Wednesday in Adelaide, where there is a federal community cabinet meeting. After the suggestion he was stalking the PM was splashed in the media, he said he did not want any controversy to detract from the important work she and the team would be doing there. Apparently the city is too small for both of them to be performing, albeit on separate stages.
Peter Kington
Raconteur, ideas man and food whore at Self Employed
So, two offerings today from Michelle Grattan. One was a reasonable (and I stress reasonable) analysis of yesterday's industry policy and the other is this piece of pap where Grattan dusts off her crystal ball, again, and continues with her old media obsession with Kevin Rudd.
This piece is monotonous, mostly the same in tenor as last week's lamentable offerings and is just idle tabloid gossip.
From a branding perspective, there is nothing in this sort of muck that I can't get from any other…
Read moreSimon Black
logged in via Twitter
I don't think Michelle is obsessed with Kevin Rudd but the Australian public certainly is and to mention him in a story is more than reasonable. To do otherwise would be a distortion of reality.
Michael Shand
Michael Shand is a Friend of The Conversation.
Software Tester
What about mentioning him in EVERY Story? is that fair?
Also, is journalism about pandering to the public's interest of reporting whats actually going on - this is the 4th article that I know from Michelle about Kevin07 out of I think 6 in total - its was getting boring, now its painful
Simon Black
logged in via Twitter
Well, with ALP in such a tragic postion and being screamed at by the public to give Kevin Rudd his old job back, he probably should be dominating the media.
Michael Shand
Michael Shand is a Friend of The Conversation.
Software Tester
Is he being screamed at by the public? or is this based on one bad opinion poll so far and a lot of hype by the media
Simon Black
logged in via Twitter
One bad opinion poll? Are you serious? In the whole time Julia has been there she probably had one good opinion poll. She has even set records for low polling. She had the ALP primary vote down to 25% at one stage.
Wendy MsGator
Wendy MsGator is a Friend of The Conversation.
logged in via Facebook
I came here to The Conversation for a more divergent view from the MSM. I'd just finished reading almost identical pieces in the SMH this morning and - lo and behold - here is Michelle Grattan regurgitating the same old stuff about Kevin Rudd! Very disappointed.
Hardy Gosch
Hardy Gosch is a Friend of The Conversation.
Mr.
Agree with the previous comments. Giving in to the typical poll-pusher syndrome assists in achieving the well known vested interests "desirable "outcome of "regime change".These types of articles assure that the somnambulist public remains in a constant state of befuddlement. The MSM/ABC are doing it so well these days. I am sorry to see someone like Michelle Grattan here on this website!
susan walton
logged in via email @live.com.au
I would suggest Michelle's article today is being dissed, because it's not what some people want to hear!
I guess they'd prefer to read that their political party of choice is going great guns...with fully funded policies and a popular leader with ethics, grace and foresight.
Unfortunately that is not the truth, and the truth hurts.
Perhaps it would be more helpful if those dissers would do some analyzing themselves and work out exactly why Ms Gillard and company are so reviled, instead of just shooting the messenger.
I could analyze it and tell you...but then you'd just diss me. lol!
Peter Kington
Raconteur, ideas man and food whore at Self Employed
Hi Susan - your comment is odd. I see no connection between the comments I and others after me (and before you) made and our political persuasions. What I see are people who crave a critical media which involves more than offering crystal ball commentary. You may care to note that in my comment, I referred readers to crikey.com.au where they do talk about polls, but through a critical lens. Whether there is critical thought or populist commentary does not change the outcome of the poll, but it does change the context of it and allows the reader to view a poll over a period of time.
Mike Hansen
Mr
"I guess they'd prefer to read that their political party of choice is going great guns...with fully funded policies and a popular leader with ethics, grace and foresight."
"ethics, grace and foresight."?
"fully funded policies"?
Well that rules out Tony Abbott and the Liberals.
Simon Black
logged in via Twitter
I think you've nailed it, Susan. The artice is a good analysis if what the polls mean but most of the comments are irrelevant and have nothing to do with the story. Gillard does have a problem with the electorate, as does the ALP. It's reasonable to ask why.
Hardy Gosch
Hardy Gosch is a Friend of The Conversation.
Mr.
For an alternative viewpoint I suggest the following:
http://www.independentaustralia.net/2013/politics/2013-federal-election-fix/
susan walton
logged in via email @live.com.au
There were only the 2 comments before mine, and they were both busy shooting the messenger...I can only assume that was because the messenger was sending out a message they didn't want to hear. Nothing odd about it.
I read Crikey and have seen similar articles to this one....one can analyze such articles to death, the bottom line is...
Read moreSlipper
Thomson
AWA
HSU
Carbon Tax
Miners Tax
Timor
Malaysia
Live cattle export debacle
Cash for clunkers
Grocery watch aka Rudd...but still a Labor…
Michael Ousley
At large
Glasses. You forgot the glasses. But this is what your real problem is:
"The 2 appalling attacks on Mr Rudd"
By the way, has it occurred to you what Abbott's involvement in some of these crimes is? Particularly items 1, 2, 4, 8 and 13?
Just as well she didn't give the wall a smack either side of the ears of a tiny woman, eh?
Simon Black
logged in via Twitter
Leaders live and die by the polls and these last few polls are a death sentence for Julia. The positive thing is that they still have 7 months for the new leader to get established and work on Abbott. Of course, if they put anyone other than Rudd in the leadership, the electorate will be furious for the ALP defying them like they did last February. So, the choice for the ALP is Rudd or Rudd. Only question is, will Kevin tell them to get stuffed after the way he was treated?
Hardy Gosch
Hardy Gosch is a Friend of The Conversation.
Mr.
Despite all the misinformation supplied by the mediocre media and the obsession with polls and personality politics there is still a slight chance the focus might shift in time to the absolute incompetence of the "tea party". Let sanity prevail and prevent us sinking back into regressiveness with all the recent small gains wiped out.
Wake up people before its too late..
Hardy Gosch
Hardy Gosch is a Friend of The Conversation.
Mr.
Worth reading:
http://www.independentaustralia.net/2013/politics/unpredictive-opinion-polls-pointless-except-to-sow-discord/
Simon Black
logged in via Twitter
So, basically you are saying, when the opinion polls are bad for Julia Gillard, we shouldn't discuss them? Not discussing opinion polls would be unprecedented, wouldn't it?
Of course, if you look hard enough, you can find any independent journalist or blogger who will tell you what you want to hear if the reality of life is too much for you.
The electorate gave the ALP a lot of good faith in 2007 and it seemed like they could have been there for the next 10 years but they pressed the self destruct button in 2010 and haven't taken their finger off the button since.
Hugh Watkins
Client Advisor.
Hi Michelle, The linked image is a word cloud of your articles. FYI, the bigger a word, the more times you have used it in an article.
http://i.imgur.com/4lEaopD.png
Might it be time to stop harping on about Kevin Rudd?
Michael Ousley
At large
Gee, the word "Abbott" is a tiny little part of that cloud, isn't it? Just like the MSM's coverage of this walking, talking disaster. Still, they aren't going to go after him because, warts and all, he's their guy.
Steve Birdsall
Retired
Right on cue, the Manly Daily arrives with the headline "Abb-solutely" and a near full-page photo of Tony Abbott "pictured in the Manly Daily offices yeterday" and looking "poised to become the peninsula's first prime minister".
Perhaps equally scary is a prediction on page 5, which is otherwise fully devoted to Abbott:: "BRONNIE TO JOIN HIM ON FRONT BENCH IF LIBERALS ELECTED".
don davey
retired
From the moment Rudd became known as a Pollie i recognized him for the charlatan he is , as did eventually his party, the problem is that Julia is a little (but not much better) and the sooner this labor rabble are gone the better !
If in fact Rudd is reinstated ! which is what he is waiting for is for ! the party to come to him on bended knees ! , then the Polls will soar for Labor because of the Australian penchant for lifting the underdog and that is exactly what the Libs need to be concerned about.
Michael Shand
Michael Shand is a Friend of The Conversation.
Software Tester
Disappointing, even if Rudd is going to become PM you have failed to say what difference it would make at all except "THey will have a better chance of winning..." - do we want that? what policy changes would happen?
It seems this is all about winning some race not so much about governing the country - this is why you keep getting negative comments, I dont care who the supreme leader is really unless it makes a difference in policy
If you keep insisting on obsessing about Rudd at least tell us why Rudd would be better for the country than Julia - please? thats what I would call journalism
this is just opinion about an opinion poll which reflects opinions of voters who dont know the facts AKA its poo stirring
Jay HR
Student
Dear Michelle Grattan,
I stopped reading your articles at Fairfax, and after scanning this one will think twice before clicking on anything else you write. All I read here are the restated poll results with some added conjecture and noise.
Yuri Pannikin
Director
Nice article, Michelle.
I would remind the critics that the dismissal of Rudd was the most shameful, disgusting, malevolent, deceitful and treacherous act of politics I have seen in my many decades of political life in Australia.
In polls, he was actually leading, two-party preferred, when he was so wantonly usurped by a band of two-bit power-brokers, right-wing fascists and inordinate dills.
No wonder Rudd is talked about.
Raine S Ferdinands
Retired
Soooo agree with your expressed sentiments Yuri. Rudd was an intellect; hardworking, and a decent man with a strategic outlook. He did not rise through the unions; he could not stand the over-bearing, crude, self-seeking union minions masquerading as "King-Makers". Lazy civil servants feared him and disliked him. Labor can never appreciate the likes of Rudd. He is not corrupt and is untarnished and thus did not fit in with this new Labor. That Labor denounced him again and again (after assassinating him politically) is a testament to "Labor eating its own". Labor lost all credibility with most Aussies. If Rudd was a Liberal, he'd be much appreciated. From the day Labor felled its promising leader, Labor has been sliding to oblivion. Serves them right!! Nothing will save Labor now; not even Rudd .... too much mud. Rudd may save Labor from total annihilation but forming the next Govt .... nay!! Gillard destroyed Labor. Treachery doesn't pay. Never has and never will.