Rethinking the age boys reach puberty

Boys are entering puberty earlier than previously thought, according to research from the United States recently published in the journal Pediatrics. The largest study of its type, enrolling 4,131 healthy boys between six and 16 years of age with broad geographical representation, provides evidence…

Tjq9975m-1351734528
The study raises a number of questions about what influences puberty onset. Gideon/Flickr

Boys are entering puberty earlier than previously thought, according to research from the United States recently published in the journal Pediatrics.

The largest study of its type, enrolling 4,131 healthy boys between six and 16 years of age with broad geographical representation, provides evidence that male puberty begins in the general population around ten or 11 years of age. That’s six to 24 months earlier than what was understood from studies undertaken 40 to 50 years ago.

Puberty in boys is driven by a sudden and sustained increase in the hormone testosterone. Testosterone prepares the testis to produce sperm and causes development of secondary sexual characteristics, such as pubic and facial hair and vocal deepening. Boys who develop elevated testosterone and associated features much earlier than their peers may experience significant and long-term social and educational challenges emerging from peer group and physiological pressures.

The researchers recorded distinct differences between African American, Hispanic and Caucasian (“white”) boys in the age of puberty onset. They found that one in five African American boys as young as six years old have visible signs of development, such as pubic hair and testis growth. Differences in pubertal timing between ethnic groups suggest that genetics underlie at least part of the biology of puberty.

Research has provided basic knowledge about which physiological processes control the timing of pubertal initiation but many aspects of this process are still only poorly understood. Some progress has recently been made in identifying candidate genetic factors, including our recent report on the timing of testis development.

We found that the process is explicitly dependent on a protein that conveys information from outside of the cell to the genes, switching them on or off. In unravelling this complex story, we discovered that testis development occurs earlier when the level of the protein in question is reduced, but development is delayed when it’s absent.

Importantly, these differences in developmental timing occurred without measurable changes in reproductive hormones. This suggests that testis maturation is not solely under the control of the hormonal axis. How an individual’s genetic make-up, the environmental factors they are exposed to and the interaction between these influence the timing of puberty and pace of puberty are important targets for future research.

The central outcome of the US study is that the average age of pubertal onset in boys is around ten to 11 years of age, earlier than the current clinical definition of normal puberty. This has immediate relevance to the management of boys’ health – health-care providers must recalibrate what is considered “normal”.

Early (precocious) puberty may arise from serious medical conditions, such as testicular or pituitary tumours that require treatment. But the redefinition of the age of pubertal onset is of much greater relevance to boys with delayed puberty.

Testosterone not only drives puberty but is also important for normal bone and muscle development. Delayed puberty results in lower bone density in adulthood, placing these men at increased risk of developing osteoporosis. This means reduced quality of life and significant social and health-care burdens. Timely testosterone treatment of boys with delayed puberty would promote bone growth, so that these boys may achieve normal bone density and strength in adulthood.

Another immediate impact of this study relates to the diagnosis and treatment of boys with Klinefelter syndrome. This condition, arising from the presence of an extra X chromosome, affects around one in 580 males and is characterised by under development of the testes and low-to-absent testosterone.

Boys with Klinefelter syndrome aren’t obviously distinguishable from other boys during infancy and early childhood, so it’s the delay or absence of puberty due to insufficient testosterone production that precipitates diagnosis. The associated features of this condition, which can include a lack of physical coordination, behavioural and learning difficulties and poor muscle and bone strength, can be minimised with early diagnosis, medical intervention and educational support.

Unfortunately, because of the inert nature of Klinefelter syndrome during early years, many boys are not diagnosed until well into their teens. The major challenge for health professionals is to identify these boys early enough to put interventions in place that will support their health, educational and social development. Formal recognition that puberty in boys occurs between ten and 11 years will increase the chance of earlier diagnosis for these boys.

There’s also an intriguing hint in this paper that socioeconomic factors may also influence the timing of puberty. In the study population, 80% of white boys had medical insurance, compared to one-third of African American boys. This raises a question about whether pubertal timing reflects socioeconomic conditions, which affect nutrition, health status and other lifestyle factors.

This benchmark paper provides the impetus to revisit the nature versus nurture debate to discover what controls human reproductive health.

Sign in to Favourite

Want to follow The Conversation?

Sign up to our free newsletter to get the day's top stories in your inbox each morning, with a special wrap on Saturday.

Spinner
Become a friend of The Conversation and donate

Join the conversation

16 Comments sorted by

  1. Dale Bloom

    Analyst

    It has been recognised for some time that girls have been reaching puberty earlier, but until recently, boys were simply left out of studies.

    Attempts have been made to give testosterone a bad image by various people. For example, labelling it the “bad-boy of human hormones”.

    https://theconversation.edu.au/aint-no-t-in-teamwork-fool-testosterone-makes-us-bad-collaborators-5233

    However, because girls are reaching puberty at an earlier age also, production of more testosterone in boys is not…

    Read more
  2. Michael Wilbur-Ham (MWH)

    Writer (ex telecommunications engineer)

    What effect on young people's love lives has the fact that most boys are now watching hundreds (or should that be thousands) of hours of porn before they become sexually active?

    The body reaching puberty earlier has the boys interested in sex earlier.

    This earlier physical maturity is not matched by earlier mental maturity.

    Add porn to the mix and .....

    report
    1. Michael Wilbur-Ham (MWH)

      Writer (ex telecommunications engineer)

      In reply to Michael Wilbur-Ham (MWH)

      PS - I'm not suggesting that the simplistic answer of banning porn would work. So the above is not a pro-censorship post.

      But I do think we need to think about the effect of porn on the young, and come up with ways to present the young with better information about sex.

      report
    2. Michael Wilbur-Ham (MWH)

      Writer (ex telecommunications engineer)

      In reply to Dale Bloom

      I'm not proposing any theory of why boys (or girls) are starting puberty earlier.

      I am proposing the theory that looking at huge amounts of porn before first sexual activity will not be good for how boys think about sex, and pointing out that if they start puberty earlier then they will be less mature when they first do so.

      I think this will cause problems, but it is unfair to blame the boys for this.

      report
    3. Judith Olney

      Ms

      In reply to Michael Wilbur-Ham (MWH)

      Can you please post some evidence for your statement that most boys are watching thousands of hours of porn, and at what age this is supposed to be taking place. Thank you

      report
    4. Michael Wilbur-Ham (MWH)

      Writer (ex telecommunications engineer)

      In reply to Judith Olney

      I'm not an academic, so the best I can do is first apply some common sense - are you really suggesting that most boys don't look at porn?

      3 hours per week for the teenage years (13 - 19) would be over a thousand hours. While this much viewing might at first seem unrealistically high, I'm sure that some would achieve this.

      I did put the 'or should that be thousands' in brackets, and I had not done this calculation. So if this an essay I've failed, but as its a conversation I hope it is ok).

      This link is just a blog, but it includes links to other sources:
      http://www.sync-blog.com/sync/2010/06/internet-porn-stats-should-parents-be-concerned.html
      (The reason this is the link I bookmarked is the extensive discussion following the blog article.)

      I would be keen to know any other sources of information on this topic (academic or otherwise).

      report
    5. Dale Bloom

      Analyst

      In reply to Michael Wilbur-Ham (MWH)

      I think a problem has arisen when the article only made mention of boys, and didn’t mention that girls are apparently reaching puberty earlier also.

      Articles that leave out relevant information inevitably lead to a range of myths and misconceptions, and there have already been enough myths and misconceptions propagated about gender in our feminist type society.

      The issue of girls and boys reaching puberty at an increasingly earlier age is very important for our younger generation.

      If the trend continues, children as young as 8, or eventually 6 could be reaching puberty, and I don't believe that would be natural or normal.

      report
    6. Michael Wilbur-Ham (MWH)

      Writer (ex telecommunications engineer)

      In reply to Dale Bloom

      Perhaps boys are only mentioned because the study the article report on was only about boys.

      And perhaps it is already known that girls are starting puberty earlier but it was new that boys were as well.

      I agree with you that important issues are raised by this change.

      And I would love to know WHY this change is happening? Is it just natural due to better nutrition? Or is it possible that some chemicals are changing our biology?

      report
    7. Dale Bloom

      Analyst

      In reply to Michael Wilbur-Ham (MWH)

      I tend to think the information about girls was purposely left out. There is rarely an article involving gender from a university academic that does not leave out relevant information.

      There was a rather contentious theory regards girls reaching puberty earlier, and that was the hormone estrogen is now much more common in the environment and was getting into waterways, but it was mainly coming from the pill (via human urine).

      http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=estrogen-in-waterways

      Also perfumes containing estrogen were being worn more often by women, which was putting extra estrogen into the air for young children to breath, particularly in the home.

      The high levels of estrogen in the environment could be making girls reach puberty much earlier, but that theory could be defunct with boys also reaching puberty earlier.

      report
    8. Sue Ieraci

      Public hospital clinician

      In reply to Dale Bloom

      First, Dale says "It has been recognised for some time that girls have been reaching puberty earlier, but until recently, boys were simply left out of studies."

      then

      "I think a problem has arisen when the article only made mention of boys, and didn’t mention that girls are apparently reaching puberty earlier also."

      Honestly, Dale - do you think you might be happier as a girl?

      And - children inhaling oestrogens in perfume? Aren't they more likely to be harmed by inhaling the alcohol?

      report
    9. Dale Bloom

      Analyst

      In reply to Sue Ieraci

      So what is making girls and boys reach puberty at a younger and younger age, and is it acceptable?

      PS. I don't drink, but I do find it very uncomfortable to be in a room with many women. The amount of artificial perfume normally in the air is suffocating.

      report
    10. Sue Ieraci

      Public hospital clinician

      In reply to Dale Bloom

      How do you go with after-shave?

      The trend to earlier puberty has been tracked for many years - according to this paper, for at least 150 years, in wealthy countries:
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2465479/

      The changes are easier to track in girls because the biological markers are more easily precisely defined (breast development), but are also found in boys, as we have discussed.

      The changes are generally thought to reflect a combination of improved nutrition and less physical stress from childhood infectious diseases (as a consequence of vaccination).

      report
    11. Sue Ieraci

      Public hospital clinician

      In reply to Dale Bloom

      No, Dale. The reason for the steady decline over 150 years is better nutrition.
      Malnutrition delays puberty.

      report
  3. Linus Bowden

    management consultant

    Yet another example of why Australian public schools are going extinct. With only 10% of their primary school teachers being men, any parent of sons would want out of the public system.

    report