Sections

Services

Information

UK United Kingdom

Self-immolators in Tibet near 100 as pressure grows from China

On January 12, a young Tibetan man, Tsering Tashi, set himself on fire in a nomadic area in China’s Gansu province, while calling for the long life of the Dalai Lama and a free Tibet. Less than a week…

Chinese police in Tibet are equipped with guns and a fire extinguisher to deal with any person protesting through self immolation. AAP/STR

On January 12, a young Tibetan man, Tsering Tashi, set himself on fire in a nomadic area in China’s Gansu province, while calling for the long life of the Dalai Lama and a free Tibet. Less than a week later, another young man, Drubchog, set himself alight in a nomadic area of Sichuan province. A third young man, Kunchok Kyab, burned himself last Tuesday. All died at the scene of their protest.

These three self-immolations, the first in 2013, follow a month-long pause since the self-burning death of a teenage girl, Wangchen Kyi, in a Tibetan region of Qinghai Province on 9 December last year. Since the first such act in 2009, 97 Tibetans have now reportedly self-immolated in Tibetan-populated areas of China: 12 in 2011, 81 in 2012 and three to date in 2013, most fatally.

As they burned, the self-immolators have each called for a free Tibet and cultural freedoms they believe are under threat, but above all they call for the return of the Dalai Lama to Tibet. The Chinese government has blamed the self-immolations and protests on external provocation, specifically instigation and encouragement by outside “hostile forces” the government refers to as “the Dalai clique”. Official spokespeople reject any responsibility for the self-immolations.

Local authorities already deploy massive security forces in the areas where self-immolations have taken place, treating these acts as criminal threats to social stability. Government and security offices utilise additional forms of coercive and punitive measures, including propaganda efforts, blocked communications, and detention of self-immolators' associates.

Despite intensive security and other pressures, self-immolations surged in October-November last year, with 28 reported in November alone. Notably, during that period, the overall profile of self-immolators shifted from a monastic majority concentrated in Sichuan Province to a lay majority located outside of Sichuan, especially in Qinghai and Gansu provinces. From a political and security perspective, the shift to a secular majority and wider distribution poses a significantly more complex challenge to the Chinese government.

As local authorities intensified their crackdown, China’s Supreme People’s Court, Supreme People’s Procuratorate and the Ministry of Public Security issued a joint legal opinion to align judicial, prosecution and security agencies behind the drive to punish Tibetans who they suspect of having links to self-immolators as criminals, or who express sympathy for them. The opinion sets out parameters for local officials to use to criminalise a range of activities that officials associate with self-immolation, and to treat a number of such activities as “intentional homicide”. Other activities, such as gathering a group to mourn or collect funds for a self-immolator, would be prosecuted as crimes under China’s criminal law. This represents a more formal and powerful approach than previous measures.

State authorities may hope that such legal measures will effectively deter any further expressions of protest. Official pressures and measures putting family and sympathetic supporters of self-immolators at risk of punishment may have deterred self-immolations in the weeks between the burning deaths of 9 December 2012 and 12 January 2013. But the opinion more likely anticipates sensitive periods ahead, for example Tibetan New Year in February and the anniversary in March of the 1959 uprising in Lhasa when the Dalai Lama fled into exile.

By easing some of the pressures on Tibetans, and considering more effective application of its own system of “ethnic autonomy,” Chinese authorities could reduce tensions. But the recently-issued opinion foreshadows no such relief.

Threatening the consequences of non-compliance, public security officials forced Tsering Tashi’s family to forego customary Tibetan Buddhist rituals and accept the immediate cremation of his remains. Security personnel took Drubchog’s body from the site of his protest and cremated it the same day without informing his relatives. Kunchok’s body too was confiscated by authorities: mourners have gathered to perform prayers for him in front of the local government office, despite warnings to desist.

The disturbing probability of the 100th Tibetan self-immolation looms. Amid the strengthening of punitive measures against expressions of Tibetan grievance, the level of Tibetan resentment can only rise.

Sign in to Favourite

Join the conversation

4 Comments sorted by

  1. wilma western

    logged in via email @bigpond.com

    What are these awful self-immolations achieving? Publicity overseas but no action and only repression from paranoid Chinese authorities. Something should change - especially in Chinese authorities' approach but surely also from whoever represents these tragic acts as advancing the Tibetan cause.

    report
    1. Susette Cooke

      Lecturer in China Studies at University of Technology, Sydney

      In reply to wilma western

      These are tragic acts, driven by lack of alternatives for expression or action. A responsible Chinese Government should investigate its citizens' grievances rather than inflicting ever harsher punishments for expressing them.

      report
  2. Aleksandra Hadzelek

    Lecturer in International Studies at University of Technology, Sydney

    Thank you Susette for this much needed reminder of what's happening in Tibet for those of us who don't follow closely China-specific news. General news used to report on these acts of self-immolations until they became so common that, I supposed, the media lost interest. While China is opening its economy and adopts some democratic forms of government and public life, we mustn't forget about groups such as Tibetans that continue to suffer from such drastic centralist policies that it drives people to set themselves on fire.

    report
    1. Susette Cooke

      Lecturer in China Studies at University of Technology, Sydney

      In reply to Aleksandra Hadzelek

      Yes, the media typically focuses on new stories rather than evolving developments. The level of frustration in China's Tibetan areas can only deepen without Chinese Government attention to the actual causes of protest. Sadly the Government has only responded to this wave of Tibetan self-immolations with punitive measures. Those who burn themselves and any who show support or sympathy for them are now liable for punishment under the criminal law.

      report