The super trawler Margiris is an environmental “experiment” and the conditions placed on it by the government don’t go far enough to protect dolphins, seals and other protected species, fisheries and oceans experts argue.
Speaking on the ABC’s Q&A program on Monday, Federal Environment Minister Tony Burke said under national environmental law he didn’t have the power to block the trawler all together.
“What I do have is the legal power to impose a number of restrictions on it based on the impact it can have, not on the fish that it’s targeting, but on the by-catch – the seals, the dolphins, the fish that are protected and listed and I have responsibility for,” Mr Burke said.
These conditions include an onboard observer and the use of a 24-hour underwater camera to monitor the effectiveness of technology designed to eject dolphins and seals accidentally caught in the trawler’s net.
The trawler will not be allowed to fish in sea lion hunting grounds, and if one dolphin or three seals are caught and killed by the nets, the trawler will be required to stop fishing and move 50 nautical miles to restart fishing.
The trawler will also have to report daily on any incidents involving protected wildlife. There will also be regular reviews of the vessel’s response to such incidents.
But Jessica Meeuwig, research professor in the UWA Oceans Institute at University of Western Australia, said these conditions do not justify the introduction of a super trawler to Australian waters.
“The restrictions will not prevent the death of listed species potentially associated with the large capacity of this super trawler,” Professor Meeuwig said.
“The "tough” conditions mean 10 seals can die within a 24 hour period before the Margiris would be required to temporarily suspend fishing operations and relocate in order to continue fishing. So while the observer and camera programs will provide data on the rate and location of deaths, it is not clear to what degree deaths will be mitigated nor why we would expose our protected wildlife to a super trawler,“ she said.
Colin Hunt, who teaches fisheries economics at the University of Queensland, agreed.
“The effectiveness of the exclusion device in the net is the key to the number of deaths that will occur,” Dr Hunt said.
He added it is unlikely that Australian fur seals will be deterred from entering the net, and if the exclusion device isn’t working well and deaths are occurring there may be little that can be done, while at sea, to modify the net.
“The fact that the trawler will be ordered to move on after causing the deaths of a dolphin or three seals is in fact no guarantee that the next shot won’t also cause dolphin or seal mortality.
“The challenge I throw out to Tony Burke is to arrange for the Australian Fish Management Authority to provide its observer data of dolphin and Australian fur seal incidents and deaths during trawling operations and not sometime after the vessel has left our waters,” Dr Hunt said.
Professor Meeuwig has raised concerns about the sustainability of a super trawler targeting “small pelagics” who live on the surface of the water, and said the conditions detailed on Monday do not address those concerns.
“The Margiris still represents a major experiment with respect to Australia’s southern oceans both in terms of officially protected species … and in terms of our other wildlife, the fishes,” Professor Meewig said.
Wade Macdonald
Technician
The SA Government seeks for a full ban. Impacts to existing sardine fishers in SA and the important food source that mackeral provide for pelagic predators are the reason why SA still has a good marine environment and sound recreational fishing opportunities.
Mackeral populations in SA state waters over the last few years have been bringing back the large pelagics right up into the gulfs and also aided in increased marine mammal populations.
We don't need our recent state fisheries management arrangements for increased biodiversity protection undermined by foriegn fishing interests that are only seeking to provide protein sources to the very same countries who's waters they destroyed.
stib
logged in via Twitter
I'm a bit confused by all the fuss over the Margiris. Do people think that other fishing vessels just ask the fish nicely to hop out of the sea and into a can?
Industrial fishing is a war of extinction against fish–70% of marine fish species are on the brink of collapse due to overfishing, yet a quarter of the global catch is discarded as "bycatch".
Don't like the sound of that? Well don't start a Facebook group, just stop eating the stuff.
Colin Hunt
Honorary Fellow in Economics at University of Queensland
The benefit of the debate about the Margiris is that it has opened up the debate about the sustainability of fishing in our waters and perhaps even more important it has brought to light the bycatch issue. Other Australia fisheries even more destructive than trawling as far as protected species go are longline. In this type of fishing we are losing endangered sharks in numbers and possibly many turtles and seabirds. Unfortunately we don’t know the extent of the bycatch because the log book data of fishers is unreliable. Moreover, in Australia we still have net fisheries that specifically target sharks even though we know sharks are vulnerable to depletion
Wade Macdonald
Technician
Hi Colin,
I respect the fact that we need to supply protein sources to the populas. However the fishing trends that focus on large scale efficiency for profits are ignorant drivers of the resultant detrimental environmental effect.
It is my personal opinion that extraction of our stocks by humans needs to be more stable than the short, sharp extraction methods that give scientists, gov departments no chance of effectively monitoring.
Super trawlers and irregular increases in longlining, trawling activities should be condemned to the last century not the current one.
I see the Margiris initiative as a backwards step that provides a monopoly, not a diverse industry with high employment benefits for Australians or perhaps a sustainably long term one either.
Andy Saunders
Consultant
The industry has been focussed on bycatch and sustainability for many years. Not new at all. Just new to people who haven't given it much thought until Greenpeace started an action campaign.
A campaign, incidentally, which was initiated with some outright lies and distortions, in my opinion.
Disgraceful conduct.
Wade, your first comment is indicative possibly of simple protectionism...