Time to thaw: the human side of the research funding freeze

The Australian Research Council’s confirmation that all funding awards and rounds are currently frozen has caused major concern, if not panic, in academic circles. The Mid Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook (MYEFO) announcement is slated for early next week – possibly as early as Monday – and will hopefully…

3cdnv4dx-1350602585
Researchers who have sometimes been waiting years for funding have been left in the lurch by government. Research image from www.shutterstock.com

The Australian Research Council’s confirmation that all funding awards and rounds are currently frozen has caused major concern, if not panic, in academic circles.

The Mid Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook (MYEFO) announcement is slated for early next week – possibly as early as Monday – and will hopefully provide answers to the storm of funding freeze questions. Senior university figures and key organisations such as Universities Australia have rushed to caution the government against short-term budget balancing at the expense of the nation’s research future.

But the human cost of this uncertainty and potential slashing of research opportunities is real and very substantial. As Professor Lesley Head, an Australian Laureate Fellow at the University of Wollongong, put it: “the ivory tower is full of people; people with partners, families, homes, lives.” But these lives have been put on hold.

Right now, the single ARC Linkage round for 2012 has failed to open. When you consider that to develop a competitive ARC grant application takes a year or so, you can see why researchers would be a little distressed. But when you understand that some researchers have taken years to build strong industry partnerships for an ARC grant, then it’s not just a wasted year. The freeze can jeopardise that relationship and ultimately, the career of the researcher.

Charlie Huang, from RMIT’s School of Management, has been painstakingly preparing his Linkage application since April this year and developing his relationship with his industry partner, Sinosteel Midwest Corporation, for years before this.

“I’m very disappointed to learn that the government may freeze ARC funding as I have worked intensively with my potential co-investigator and industry partner to identify and develop a research project that is of national significance and benefit to the Australian mining industry,” Dr Huang said. “A freeze could have a major impact on opportunities for us to collaborate with industry in the future.”

Not only does a freeze have the potential to derail university and industry projects that have long been incubated, it also severely compromises the attraction of Australia as a place to do research. Eva Alisic, a Monash University Larkins Fellow who has also been awarded two major international fellowships (a Marie Curie fellowship from the EU, and a Rubicon fellowship from the Dutch Research Council), arrived from the Netherlands in 2011.

She describes Australia as a “very interesting destination for international researchers”, with engaging research and funding possibilities.

“It’s crucial to ensure continuity and reliability in research funding,” said Dr Alisic. “Otherwise, you’ll see fewer internationals taking the risk to move here and more domestic researchers going overseas.“ She said Australia should be trying to avoid a "brain drain”.

Cancelling or postponing funding rounds will also curtail opportunities for excellent Early Career Researchers (ECRs) in Australia. The ARC Discovery ECR Award (DECRA) scheme is only two years old, and only one round has ever been awarded. The success rate was a challenging 12%.

The second round’s results are currently in limbo. With a restriction on how many years post-PhD you can be to apply, holding off on a round can mean that many potential applicants will miss out completely because they will become ineligible. Even if special dispensation is given because of a freeze, the glutting of futures round will mean a very poor chance of success for applicants.

Vanessa Cooper, who works in RMIT’s School of Business IT and Logistics and researches Green IT, has been waiting on this year’s DECRA results since March. This is the last year that she is eligible to apply for this scheme.

“While DECRA applicants all go into the grants process knowing a successful outcome is a long-shot,” said Dr Cooper, “any decision that decreases the funds available, or results in more applications being considered in any given round, will increase that long-shot to the extent that I would seriously question whether the months spent slaving over an application are worth it."

This is a shame, according to Cooper, as “a key reason the scheme was introduced in the first place was recognition of the need to support and advance early career researchers in this country.”

Next week’s MYEFO news will hopefully at least provide some certainty around what the government intends to do on research funding, particularly regarding the ARC. If the rumour-mill is proven correct and there are cancelled rounds and postponed awards, Australian research funding may well be moving into what QUT research fellow, Ben Kraal, has called “El Nino territory”. But we simply can’t afford for research in Australia to go into a long dry spell, that could take years to recover from.

Articles also by This Author

Sign in to Favourite

Want to follow The Conversation?

Sign up to our free newsletter to get the day's top stories in your inbox each morning, with a special wrap on Saturday.

Spinner
Help evidence based journalism become the norm and donate

Join the conversation

11 Comments sorted by

  1. Inger Mewburn

    Director of research training at Australian National University

    Great article Tseen. If this was a freeze in car manufacturing there would be mass hysteria by the mainstream media and in question time. I'm not sure of the exact figures, but surely if you could the number of people who are affected by this freeze - the researchers, their families, university support people and THEIR families - it would be a larger number than those affected by car plants shutting down.

    report
    1. Tseen Khoo

      Senior Advisor, Research Development at RMIT University

      In reply to Inger Mewburn

      Indeed, and I can't help quoting Prof Lesley Head on this:

      "Investing in young researchers is an investment for the nation. If 2000 jobs were at risk in manufacturing, governments of all persuasions would be worried. But is anyone taking notice of a generation at risk in the university sector? A budget surplus will be a hollow victory if it means reducing intellectual capacity and throwing these highly trained people out of work, or out of the country." (http://uowblogs.com/ausccer/2012/10/18/the-ivory-tower-is-full-of-people/)

      She was spot-on with her piece in the AUSCCER blog.

      report
  2. Emily Kothe

    logged in via Twitter

    The impact on postdoctoral researchers is something I think is especially important. These are the researchers who are least likely to have an academic job to keep them going when funding is delayed or reduced. As Alex Holcombe (University of Sydney) there are new PhDs waiting for postdoc jobs to apply for - but without ARC grants those jobs don't exist.

    Delaying funding (especially when there isn't information about how long that delay will last) means that early career researchers have little choice but to leave Australia and find work overseas or simply leave academia.

    Senator Evans said to Lee Rhiannon yesterday in Senate Estimates ""No-one apart from you is suggesting that it is playing out in that way" http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-10-17/greens-attack-freeze-on-research-grants/4318898 - but that is exactly is happening and will continue to happen if this keeps dragging on.

    report
    1. Tseen Khoo

      Senior Advisor, Research Development at RMIT University

      In reply to Emily Kothe

      Thanks, Emily. It's the bigger picture, isn't it, about what it means to take a stop-start attitude to research funding. Even if all goes ahead as planned with the major ARC rounds for the next year (with a slightly postponed Linkage), the confidence that's lost in the sector has definite effect.

      report
    2. Emily Kothe

      logged in via Twitter

      In reply to Tseen Khoo

      Absolutely - I know some amazingly talented students who are moving out of academia because they don't have confidence that they can have job security in research.

      report
    1. Tseen Khoo

      Senior Advisor, Research Development at RMIT University

      In reply to Chris Booker

      Thanks for that, Chris. I've just tweeted that Nature piece out (with hat-tip to you). Very interesting figures, and disconnect also between where they see the future of major scientific work (China) and where they would want to live (highest % to US and UK).

      report
  3. Meagan Tyler

    Lecturer in Sociology at Victoria University

    Thanks for this article Tseen.

    It is amazing, as Inger says, that there isn't actually more widespread concern (or panic!) about this.

    Surely, the possibility of a "stop-start" approach also throws into question several institutions' attempts to introduce benchmarks for academic staff based on research funding. If, next year, (or any given year in future) we cannot guarantee that one of most important and prestigious sources of research funding in this country will be available then we can't really expect researchers to aim for it and punish them if they don't.

    report
    1. Tseen Khoo

      Senior Advisor, Research Development at RMIT University

      In reply to Meagan Tyler

      Rethinking the overemphasis on ARCs in Australian research culture is no bad thing, but you're right about the consequences of a diminished overall pool of funding for research. Let's see what transpires next week! Hopefully, they'll put us out of our misery soon - one way or another.

      report
  4. Carmen Lahiff-Jenkins

    Managing Editor, International Journal of Stroke at University of Melbourne

    I have been speaking to colleagues around the world about this issue recently, and many researchers, some from fantastic research backgrounds, are interested in coming to work with the amazing researchers and teams in Australia. In these conversations the main drawcard is our quality of life, the importance of which we underestimate for mid career researchers with families; however, many realise they are expected to bring their own money with them! In this climate that's not always feasible, and if the government is not committed to science and research these collaborations are at risk. Countries like Germany are a great example of how investment in research leads to greater international influence, better economies despite global downturn and consequential development of and investment in basic infrastructure, culture and art.

    report
    1. Tseen Khoo

      Senior Advisor, Research Development at RMIT University

      In reply to Carmen Lahiff-Jenkins

      (Sorry, Carmen, didn't have my notifications on!)

      What you say is all too true. The motto that 'research is an investment, not a cost' needs to be seriously taken on board. Short-term 'balancing' of budgets is a very poor reason to be cutting research infrastructure and eroding trust in the research sector as a viable employer.

      Also, it should be a high priority how a nation wants research to grow and draw excellent people from o'seas as well as support internal career-paths. Playing 'catch-up' will mean that the international playing field is weighted against us.

      report