Whether or not elections will be able to seal the breach in the Libyan polity remains an open question.
Academic rigour, journalistic flair
Articles on International Criminal Court
Displaying 41 - 60 of 160 articles
Criminalising ecocide means its victims will be able to receive reparations, helping to rebuild destroyed ecosystems and communities.
The Taliban is responsible for atrocities dating back to the 1990s, but has never been held responsible. The international community can play a role in ending the impunity.
The value of the rule of law is to challenge and constrain power. In this sense, the legacy of Habré’s trial and conviction is mixed.
Plus, why sarcasm is so difficult for children to understand – and how to help them. Listen to episode 23 of The Conversation Weekly podcast.
Environmental destruction remains an unofficial crime, but activists and scholars want it recognised.
An Indigenous lawyer makes the case that what happened to Indigenous children who went to residential schools is genocide and the case should be tried by the International Criminal Court.
Neither Israel nor Hamas will listen to New Zealand directly, but there is still more parliament can do to promote international peace efforts.
Robertson’s book is a call to action for ‘Magnitsky laws’ to be introduced in Australia, which impose sanctions and travel bans on individuals for human rights abuses.
Despite the International Criminal Court opening an investigation into potential war crimes dating back to 2014, legal accountability will likely remain elusive.
The International court did not allow Dominic Ongwen’s background to colour the legal determination of his criminal liability.
When your ‘friend’ and biggest trading partner is accused of genocide you can’t ignore it. But meaningful change will take more than words.
The International Criminal Court has been called to investigate the shooting of unarmed protesters in Lagos.
The Trump administration’s overt transgressions of international norms embolden other world leaders to violate human rights.
The court prosecutes genocide, torture and grave wartime abuses worldwide. Trump’s executive order imposes on its lawyers and judges the kind of sanctions usually used on foreign terrorists.
The court has focused on African cases to the exclusion of developed countries, as well as developing regions such as Latin America.
For democracy to work in Kenya the country needs good leadership. Politicians must uphold the constitution to infuse trust and confidence in state institutions.
The court’s decision has wider implications for international criminal law.
Given the contested success of transitional justice in Rwanda, the arrest showcases the mixed record of international justice.
There are many hurdles to a successful prosecution of individuals accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity. But trying to seek justice is not a futile exercise.
Top contributors
-
Associate Professor International Law, Roskilde University
-
Senior Lecturer in International Relations, University of Tasmania
-
Professor of Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law, Queen's University Belfast
-
Lecturer in International Relations and International Security, University of Bath
-
Associate Professor in Human Rights and International Law, University of Newcastle
-
Professor of Law, Swansea University
-
Associate professor of politics and global studies, Arizona State University
-
Teaching Fellow in Law, University of Birmingham
-
Distinguished Professor of Anthropology; Director, Center for the Study of Genocide and Human Rights, Rutgers University - Newark
-
Executive Director, University of Dayton Human Rights Center, University of Dayton
-
Professor in International Law, Bournemouth University
-
Professor of Law, University of Waikato
-
Professor/Senior Research Fellow, Centre for Advancement of Scholarship, University of Pretoria
-
Associate Professor of International Studies, University of Nottingham
-
Lecturer in Security and Public Policy, University of Bath
