How do jurors use different kinds of information about mental illness when making sentencing decisions? An experiment finds that neurobiological evidence could harm or help defendants.
Many Americans are fretting over paying their taxes. A philosopher says the moral question isn't as much about a duty toward the government, but being fair to fellow tax-paying citizens.
Where does responsibility lie if a person acts under the influence of their brain implant? As neurotechnologies advance, a neuroethicist and a legal expert write that now's the time to hash it out.
Employers like Michigan State play a critical role in protecting people – or not – from abuse by people on their payroll.
Critics say that Thabo Mbeki's character matters less than his AIDS denialism. But these things are actually intimately linked.