Rising protectionism has the potential to have major negative effects on many European companies, yet firms have been largely absent from the public conversation. Why?
Academic rigor, journalistic flair
Articles on Steel tariffs
Displaying 1 - 20 of 23 articles
New tariffs on $160 billion of Chinese goods including smartphones and sneakers are set to take effect on Dec. 15.
Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe needs the US to confront North Korea, revitalize Japan’s economy and boost his standing at home. And he knows flattery is the way to this president’s heart.
The economic theory of comparative cost advantage is more akin to natural law – it can’t be wished away. And during the ongoing trade war ignited by Donald Trump, it has never been more relevant.
Canada recently slapped a tariff on US exports of the tomato-based condiment, and the EU plans to do the same, perhaps on the notion that it’s distinctly American. In fact, ketchup’s origins are global, as are its fans.
Chinese investment in the US has never been high, but the ongoing trade war could dampen it further, with significant long-term repercussions.
Trump has started a trade war with China and much of the world. Here’s what you need to know.
If the US were to stop dumping these valuable metals in landfills and to cease exporting them as cheap scrap, its imports could fall, and there would be less of these metals being made from scratch.
After the G7 fiasco, it’s clear that a trade war is in the making. US justifications of “national security concerns” for its tariffs suggest a legitimate target for EU countermeasures: coal.
International trade policy requires three traits to be successful and lead to mutual prosperity. Trump’s is missing all three, as he showed at the G-7 summit.
US tariffs could potentially benefit some EU firms that rely on steel and aluminium.
The underlying problem with Donald Trump’s tariffs on steel and aluminum isn’t Trump. It’s the increasing willingness by the U.S. to impose its will on its neighbours amid rising economic nationalism.
The Trump administration recently imposed tariffs of up to 25 percent on foreign steel and aluminum – including from the EU, Canada and Mexico, the three biggest markets for American goods.
South Africa’s relations with the US could sour under President Trump.
Unfair competition law offers a more effective, targeted strategy to persuade China to play by the rules.
There’s a good reason China took aim at US soybean exports when it announced its latest list of retaliatory tariffs.
The $60 billion in tariffs targeting China not only risks sparking a trade war, they represent a rejection of the WTO’s much more effective way of dealing with unfair trade practices.
While the tariffs are unlikely to stem Chinese intellectual property theft or reverse the steep trade deficit, they are certain to hurt American companies and consumers.
President Trump’s new tariffs suggest he doesn’t understand why American steel and aluminum have been hurt in the first place.
A global trade war seems well underway as China and the US exchange targeted tariff attacks. An economist explains what they are, how they work and why they matter.
Top contributors
-
Associate Professor of Economics, University of South Carolina
-
Distinguished Professor, Arthur J. Gosnell Professor of Economics, & Interim Head, Department of Sustainability, Rochester Institute of Technology
-
Associate Professor of Political Science, Georgia State University
-
Professor of History, University of the Pacific
-
Lecturer in Economics, Aston University
-
Professorial Fellow, Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (UNU-MERIT), United Nations University
-
Director, Agri-Food Analytics Lab, Professor in Food Distribution and Policy, Dalhousie University
-
Research Fellow, American University School of Public Affairs
-
Senior Research Professor and Director, Center for Canadian Studies, Johns Hopkins University
-
Researcher, Kyoto Women's University
-
Professor of Economics and Government, Texas A&M University
-
Chair in Agricultural Marketing, Trade and Policy, The Ohio State University
-
Associate Professor of Law, University of Oregon
-
Professor of Law, Michigan State University
-
Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan
