Virgin Australia’s full-year profit of $22.8 million masks the ongoing challenges facing the airline as it chases a bigger share of the corporate market, says University of Sydney business school Professor Tony Webber.
Virgin has significantly ramped up its capacity to carry more customers – but this could lead to more discounted fares in the future, according to Professor Webber.
“It’s going to get messy. There will be tonnes of cheap airfares, no doubt about it,” Professor Webber said.
Virgin Australia chief John Borghetti today pointed to the airline’s success at attracting higher yielding corporate and government customers as a key driver of the airline’s improved profitability.
But Professor Webber, formerly Qantas’ chief economist, said today’s profit figure was significantly down from the airline’s first half-profit of $52 million.
“To go from that to making a profit of $22 .8 million for the full year suggests something went astray in the second half… it’s to do with the massive capacity they added to the market.”
Virgin Australia also benefited from the decision by Qantas to shut down the airline in November last year, Professor Webber said. But he added the ongoing capacity war is likely to be hurting corporate yields.
“Adding capacity won’t stimulate corporate (travellers) to travel on your planes. Corporates travel because they need to. The economy drives it, not capacity or airfares.”
Virgin Australia said it achieved its target of 20% of domestic revenue from the corporate and government market, one year ahead of schedule.
“Reaching the 20% target is a tipping point which we believe effectively creates a new competitive norm,” Mr Borghetti said.
But Professor Webber said nobody knows the size of the total corporate market, with data difficult to come by.
“It could be because he’s allocating more capacity to the corporate-intensive routes – the golden triangle of Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne, or it could be because he’s allocating more capacity to regionals, with a lot of fly in fly out traffic.
“I think the next 12 months will tell us what’s really going to happen with Virgin.”
Ian Douglas, senior lecturer in aviation at University of New South Wales, said Virgin’s claim to have exceeded its target on corporate customers when put alongside a profit result that was lower than the market expected puts the airline in a “slightly awkward place”.
Despite this, he said the airline has done all the right things in repositioning the product, brand and the staff for the corporate market.
“I don’t doubt that John Borghetti has made inroads into the corporate markets, but the market is fairly robust given the mining sector and finance industries.”
Craig Minns
Self-employed
I won't be flying Virgin. I am all too aware that the airline regards me, as a man, as a likely paedophile predator and won't trust me to sit next to children.
Sam Dickinson
Business Student & Entrepreneur
Shortly after that fiasco, another male passenger spoke to the media about an almost identical experience on Qantas - It's a pretty standard airline policy.
http://www.smh.com.au/travel/travel-incidents/nurse-humiliated-by-qantas-policy-20120813-243t4.html
Craig Minns
Self-employed
"It's a pretty standard airline policy."
Perhaps so, but that doesn't make it right.
Craig Minns
Self-employed
Out of interest, would the person(s) who put a red mark beside my first comment care to explain just what it is they felt wrranted that action? II'm struggling to work it out.
bill parker
editor wirter
The red square seems to be accessible to anyone.
Cassandra Payca
logged in via Facebook
I'm guessing the negative feedback relates to the lack of relevance your comment has to the article.
Craig Minns
Self-employed
It's quite relevant, so I don't think that can be it. The article is about the airline's efforts to grow its corporate clientele. Some substantial portion of those travellers will be people who the airline regards as presenting a high risk of aggressive paedophilia and to be sufficiently predatory with it that children sitting beside them are unsafe.
That's the airline's prerogative, but I am also free to exercise my own and encourage men not to patronise such an organisation. I don't wish the airline any ill-will, I just want the airline to have the decency to acknowledge that its policy is wrong and will be abolished and to apologise to the men of Australia for casting such a nasty aspersion.
Craig Minns
Self-employed
Indeed it is, just as commenting is accessible to anyone. If the comment is "unconstructive" then surely pressing the red square button is doubly so?