Wellbeing, happiness and sustainability: hallmarks of a new economic paradigm

What do the following people have in common? Nobel laureate economist Joseph Stiglitz, former Australian deputy prime minister Tim Fischer, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, HRH Prince Charles, OECD chief statistician Martine Durand, Indian ecological activist Vandanna Shiva, the President of Costa Rica…

Kjyp5nxn-1334102155
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, Bhutanese Prime Minister Jigmi Thinley, Costa Rican President Laura Chinchilla and administrator of the UN Development Program, Helen Clark at last week’s UN meeting on wellbeing and happiness. Casa Presidencial República de Costa Rica

What do the following people have in common? Nobel laureate economist Joseph Stiglitz, former Australian deputy prime minister Tim Fischer, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, HRH Prince Charles, OECD chief statistician Martine Durand, Indian ecological activist Vandanna Shiva, the President of Costa Rica, Laura Chinchilla Miranda, and former head of the British Civil Service, Lord Gus O’Donnell?

Answer: They were just some of over 600 delegates including heads of state, Nobel laureates, spiritual, business and community leaders who contributed to the opening of the recent United Nations High Level Meeting on Wellbeing and Happiness: Defining A New Economic Paradigm.

This landmark meeting, convened by the Prime Minister of Bhutan, Jigmi Y Thinley, followed on from the 2011 UN General Assembly motion calling for governments to promote polices focusing on sustainability, happiness and wellbeing as opposed to narrower definitions of economic growth measured solely by the expansion of GDP.

An economy that serves humanity

Prime Minister Thinley opened the meeting by noting that “the GDP-led development model that compels boundless growth on a planet with limited resources no longer makes economic sense. Within its framework, there lies no solution to the economic, ecological, social and security crises that plague the world today and threaten to consume humanity”.

“We desperately need an economy that serves and nurtures the wellbeing of all sentient beings on earth and human happiness that comes from living life in harmony with the natural world, with our communities and with our inner selves. We need an economy that will serve humanity, not enslave it.”

There was, of course, considerable debate about the potential for cynical, simplistic responses to happiness and wellbeing as core goals of public policy. And there was also broad understanding that care must be take to respect the different meanings that people from diverse cultures give to these ideas.

But there was also a widely shared understanding that whatever words we choose, the time has come to value, measure and implement an economic model which Prime Minister Thinley characterised as “sustainability-based, wellbeing-centric and inclusive”.

Rocking the boat: Towards a new economic paradigm

The following sketch of key contributions to this historic event provides an overview of key ideas and priorities discussed.

Prince Charles: “The grim reality is that our planet has reached a point of crisis. The time for us to act is rapidly running out. We are facing what could be described as a ‘perfect storm’: the combination of pollution and over-consumption of finite natural resources; the very real risk of catastrophic climate change; unprecedented levels of financial indebtedness, and a population of seven billion that is rising fast.

Prince Charles continued “as the Prime Minister [of Bhutan] said … it is hard to rock the boat, but rock it we must. As it happens, I have been doing a spot of rocking myself for a considerable number of years, precisely because I have felt the globally accepted systems of accounting for success – whether in terms of profit, or GDP – are not providing the right information for governments, businesses and other organisations to take the right decisions, given the challenges we face in the twenty-first century.”

Economist and Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz. AAP

Professor Joseph Stiglitz: “Those attempting to guide the economy and our societies are like pilots trying to steer a course without a reliable compass. We are almost blind when the metrics on which action is based are ill-designed or when they are not well understood. ” Professor Stiglitz mounted a powerful case that the time has come to move beyond GDP as the dominant measure of human progress by finalising agreement on the introduction of a more integrated set of ecological, social and economic goals and measures.

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon: “Gross National Product (GNP) has long been the yardstick by which economies and politicians have been measured. Yet it fails to take into account the social and environmental costs of so-called progress. We need a new economic paradigm that recognises the parity between the three pillars of sustainable development. Social, economic and environmental wellbeing are indivisible. Together they define gross global happiness.”

Professor Jeffrey Sachs, director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University: “GNP by itself does not promote happiness. The US has had a three time increase of GNP per capita since 1960, but the happiness needle hasn’t budged. Other countries have pursued other policies and achieved much greater gains of happiness, even at much lower levels of per capita income.”

OECD chief statistician, Martine Durand noted that the dimensions which need to be considered in a more integrated set of progress and well-being measures include: income and wealth; jobs and working conditions; health; the time we have to devote to families and friends; our ties with other people in the community; our capacity to act as informed citizens; the quality of the environment; our experiences of violence and victimisation.

Professor Robert Putnam, speaking at the Columbia University workshop which preceded the UN meeting, drew on extensive new empirical evidence to emphasise the crucial role which social connectedness and the capacity to be part of trustworthy social relationships play in the creation of flourishning and sustainable communities and organisations.

Alexander Likhotal, president of Green Cross International, speaking on behalf of President Mikhail Gorbachev: The current economic model based on the limitless exploitation of the earth’s limited resources is doomed. We now face a historical tipping point at least as significant as the dismantling of the Berlin Wall.

Likhotal’s speech included a number of specific policy suggestions of particular relevance to Australian climate change debates. We need, he argued, to “create an alliance of the ‘early birds’, the speedy frontrunners who will be the “game winners” of tomorrow”. There is no need to wait, as everybody – including traditional energy suppliers – will heed this call. The “carbon justice” approach can propel low-carbon technologies to the South. An alliance of champions on effective climate policy from America, Europe, Asia and leading “developing countries” (90% of the world’s population) can help provide the revolutionary shift needed to recalibrate our economy, protect our environment and achieve a truly sustainable development."

Dasho Karma Ura, director of the Centre for Bhutan Studies and Dasho Karma Tshiteem, director of the Gross National Happiness Commission of Bhutan: The true meaning of happiness and wellbeing lies in our relationships with our families, friends and communities, rather than in the endless consumption of material possessions. At the same time, a more enlightened recognition of the true sources of human happiness and fulfilment are also a necessary foundation of overcoming our broader ecological challenges.

A sustainable pathway for the 99%

Hunter Lovins, founder of Natural Capitalism: We must move rapidly from words to action if the 99% are to find a path to a future that is both just and sustainable. One important step will be to convene an international forum capable of forging agreement on the key principles and institutions for a new, sustainable economic paradigm – a Bretton Woods agreement for the 21st century.

Prime Minister Thinley concluded by reminding the gathering that “business as usual cannot go on and tinkering with the existing system will not do… we need a fundamental transformation”.

He also emphasised that this was just the beginning of an extensive work program designed to turn words into action by building support for alternative political and economic policies. The next steps in this process are likely to include the establishment of an International Commission on Gross National Happiness as well as detailed policy proposals to be presented to Rio + 20 in July and the UN General Assembly in 2013.

The meeting closed with prayers from senior Hindu, Buddhist, Christian, Jewish and Muslim spiritual leaders. All of them called for an awakening of the awareness that the rapid implementation of a new economic paradigm is an essential precondition for ensuring that we are to able pass on a sustainable way of life to our children and grand children.

Join the conversation

10 Comments sorted by

  1. James Jenkin

    EFL Teacher Trainer

    Sorry, but are we suggesting Tim Fischer, Prince Charles and Jeffrey Sachs give this movement credibility?!

    report
  2. Dale Bloom

    Analyst

    An extremely interesting and timely meeting. As natural resources decline, wellbeing, happiness and eventually economics will decline also.

    Any system geared for sustainability requires a lot of thought and hard work to achieve, but ultimately necessary, and I am glad to see so many dignitaries near beginning to think about it all.

    report
  3. Michael Brown

    Professional, academic, company director

    Since the 1970s the Club of Rome has been on about "imminent catastrophic ecological collapse" and the need to "transform humanity into a global interdependent sustainable society, based on respect and reverence for the Earth". Meanwhile standards of living have improved everywhere that mainstream economic principles have been sensibly applied (eg the Hawke, Keating and Howard eras in Australia).

    Can't these people think of something new?

    report
    1. Lennert Veerman

      Senior Research Fellow, School of Population Health at University of Queensland

      In reply to Michael Brown

      "Contrary to popular belief, the Limits to Growth scenarios [...] did not predict world collapse by the end of the 20th century. This paper focuses on a comparison of [...] historical data for 1970-2000 with scenarios presented in the Limits to Growth [report]. The analysis shows that 30 years of historical data compares favorably with key features of a business-as-usual scenario called the "standard run" scenario, which results in collapse of the global system midway through the 21st century."

      http://www.csiro.au/files/files/plje.pdf

      So yes, we have it good, but at the expense of ecosystems and resource supplies. Collectively we have a footprint of 1.4 planet earths. That can't last - one way or another this disbalance will be corrected. Personally, I'd prefer to start the transition to sustainability in earnest now, rather than continuing with BAU.

      report
    2. Garry Claridge

      Systems Analyst

      In reply to Michael Brown

      Michael Brown said "...standards of living have improved everywhere that mainstream economic principles...".
      By who's measure?

      This is the question many are now asking, how are you measuring prosperity and wellbeing? Is it a "standard" such as piped water and sewerage to each urban house (remember many of us country people do not have these)? Is it some guarantee of medical care? Or, is it happiness, measured by other indicators? I prefer the "Happiness" measure as a true indication of prosperity and wellbeing :)

      report
  4. John Wiseman

    Professorial Fellow at University of Melbourne

    Conversation readers may be interested to know that the April 2 UN meeting was addressed by senior Ministers and representatives from the following governments: Thailand, Japan, the UK, China, Brazil, France, Morocco, Australia, Finland, Iceland, Israel, India, Costa Rica and the EU.
    All of them warmly congratulated the Government of Bhutan for convening the meeting and welcomed this renewed focus on a more integrated approach to wellbeing, happiness and sustainability as timely and important.

    report
  5. Mister A

    Mental Health Advocate

    For many, many years there has been a growing number of people in suburban communities just like mine who have recognised that happiness is not neccessarily found in the aquisition of goods and property and having one up on the Joneses.

    We've been changing the way we live so that we are consuming less, respecting the environment and the planet, building strong bonds and intimate relationships with our neighbours and re-thinking what really matters.

    And we're not all hippies with dreads…

    Read more
  6. Marian Macdonald

    Dairy farmer and blogger

    As a dairyfarmer who chose this lifestyle and, along with it, a big drop in personal wealth, I live this philosophy every day but the toll financial stress takes long term cannot be ignored either.

    report
  7. Darragh Murray

    Self employed

    I find it rather strange that this article makes no mention of the work of economist E. F. Schumacher, particularly 'small is beautiful'. I mean, this isn't a new idea, just not a well known one.

    report
  8. James Jenkin

    EFL Teacher Trainer

    Wow, anyone who suggests economic growth and increased material comfort might be good for people gets negative ratings!

    I'd like to ask the world's poor - rather than the Australian bourgeoisie - if they think happiness needs to be 'sustainability-based, wellbeing-centric and inclusive'.

    report