
Last week I had a somewhat heated discussion with a work colleague. I was bitterly disappointed at our standing on the Olympic ladder with only one gold medal (at that point) and thought we should be performing better. His view was “why does it matter?”
My rationale was that one gold medal doesn’t reflect well on our country. We are meant to be an athletic nation and for me a key indicator of that is number of gold medals and standing in comparison to other countries at the Olympics, a key international sporting event.
My colleague’s view didn’t waver. His thoughts were that the Olympics happens every four years and it was not that important to spend millions on elite performance when the money could be better spent at the grass roots, on our youth, who participate at the community level.
The 2009 Rudd-Government-commissioned panel that recommended that community-based sport should receive more money than the elite level echoed his sentiments. For those interested, Shaun Carney wrote a really interesting piece about just this in today’s Age newspaper.
Don’t get me wrong; being a public health practitioner, I am an avid supporter of active children and engaging them in community sport from a young age. After all, that is one of the best ways to encourage and foster participation when they grow older. But isn’t seeing a successful athlete in your chosen sport also crucial to your continued participation in the activity? Don’t our children need role models who are athletes that excel on the international stage? Isn’t excelling reflected by a gold medal, or any medal for that matter?
I appreciate that many people hold the view that continued participation doesn’t necessarily come about by seeing elite athletes win gold medals but aren’t the traits that the athletes are demonstrating the exact same ones that we want to instill in our children? Determination, persistence, graciousness (win or loss) are some of the traits we want to see in our youth.
Maybe I’m too harsh a critic by judging performance solely by gold medals but I know that I, along with a lot of other people, feel better when we are doing well which is reflected by our medal tally. Thank goodness for Anna Meares and Tom Slingsby (and others) who have helped us climb the ladder of judgement for sports performance by winning a gold medal over the past few days.
And if it is anything to go by, the excitement that my 5-year-old showed this morning when Sally Pearson did us all proud to break the Olympic record and win the 100m hurdles and then go on to add that she too one day wanted to go to the Olympics and “run like Sally”, I’d say that spending money at the elite level to encourage junior participation is money well spent.
Robert Nelson
Associate Director Student Experience at Monash University
It is money badly spent. I think, Rebecca, that your colleague has much wisdom. Even if elite performance encourages emulation, it does nothing to create sustainable exercise patterns in the community. You are looking in the wrong place. All sport based on competition is unsustainable in a person's life. In the same way that men mostly give up football or competitive swimming in their twenties, so in varying degrees competition proves the weakest motif for sustainable exercise.
If you want sustainable exercise, you have to look at non-competitive forms—which Australian indoctrination do not even consider sport—like walking and commuter cycling.
The emphasis that you put on elite competition promotes the opposite motif, where people give up because they cannot compete in the league that they have been taught to aspire to. It is a pointless waste of resources and human energy.
Rebecca Braham
Assistant Professor in Exercise, Health and Sport Psychology at University of Western Australia
You make some really good points, Robert, thank you. Before I had that conversation with my colleague I had never really thought about having to make a decision on spending money on one level of sport over another. I am all for community level participation and I think you are exactly right, that is where you get sustainable exercise. My main point was that there is so much emphasis placed on succeeding at the elite level and when we are not doing as well as expected, the questions start to be raised about why aren't the resources there to facilitate higher performance. I would make a terrible politician as I would want to spend money in both areas as I see the value of having exceptional performance at the elite level while encouraging and maintaining participation at the grass roots. I think that there is value in both. Hope that you are enjoying the Games.
Paul Rogers
logged in via Twitter
"Even if elite performance encourages emulation, it does nothing to create sustainable exercise patterns in the community. "
Robert, does this mean that if we spent no or negligible money on elite sports performance that non-competitive exercise patterns would not decline?
Is there research evidence for this?
Robert Nelson
Associate Director Student Experience at Monash University
Hiya Paul (and thanks Rebecca!)
Sorry that I took my eye off the ball!
I'm not 100% sure of the question but would try to explain this way. If I walk a dog or ride my bike to work, my patterns are unlikely to decline by the Australian team being wiped out by all of the other competitive nations. Do I really need research evidence for this lack of connexion? What makes the dog in less need of a walk? What does he know of the gold or silver and why would I care any more than he might? The…
Read moreAlan W
Scientist
Australia's medal count is brilliant and reflects the great performance of our 2012 Olympic team.
So what if our swimmers didn't get their usual swag of gold? They certainly managed to come away with plenty of other colours signifying that Australia is still a force to be reckoned with in the pool.
Lets not forget our other athletes from non-swimming sports who have also done a great job.
To be perfectly honest I've been waiting for the pendulum of aquatic strength to swing away from Australia…
Read moreStephen Prowse
CEO at Wound CRC
But does it really matter? Are there intangible benefits in boosting national pride? What is the cost of those intangible benefits and can that money be better spent on other public health programs such as promoting physical activity, improving diet and drinking and smoking less. Any review (and I am sure there will be several expensive reviews) should look at this bigger picture.
By the way, I agree that Australia has done fantastically well, especially when the difference between a gold and a silver is a fingertip.