Why it’s time for companies to give us back our data

It’s personal: why shouldn’t consumers reclaim the rich data trail they create? Image sourced from Shutterstock.com

For large corporations with access to large tracts of consumer data, the challenge remains using it to be helpful, without being creepy. For a retail store, it means making sure customers know their favourite products are on special rather than bringing the news of a pregnancy to an unsuspecting father of a teenage daughter.

Why shouldn’t we decide how our own data is used?

The rich data trail we create as consumers is already used by businesses to improve the offers they make to us. Our bank, utility provider, telco operator and video streamer have a detailed set of information with which to tailor their products and services.

But why does this data belong to the service provider, rather than the consumer? It might be really handy to be able to use that data to find the best offering from a range of providers, not just the one that is currently used.

In the UK, the new “midata” service allows consumers to download the data trail they have left and which each of the service providers has collected. App developers have been encouraged to start offering software enabling people to use their own data to find the best product offering for them across the sector. midata has been rolled out on a mainly voluntary basis and is still in the early stages. In combination with consumer friendly switching regulations, such as bank account number portability, midata offers consumers a way of using their own data to make product and services choices.

This approach has been taken up in the Harper report on competition policy. In its submission to the Harper review, consumer group CHOICE argued such a scheme would support “robust demand-side competition by enabling consumers to make better informed decisions” and would encourage innovation.

The ACCC put the case that:

“initiatives to allow consumers to effectively use their information … have the potential to assist consumers to make better choices and drive competition.”

The Harper panel also noted that the UK government believe that:

“being able to base decisions on their previous behaviour will mean individuals can choose products and services which better reflect their needs and offer them the best value”

and that this would also encourage innovation.

The report references the submissions of both CHOICE and the ACCC in coming to the view that:

“Markets work best when consumers are engaged, empowering them to make informed decisions.”

“The Panel sees scope for Australian consumers to improve their access to data to better inform their decisions.”

This led to a recommendation on informed choice that governments (at all levels) should “allow consumers to access information in an efficient format to improve informed consumer choice”. The Harper review recommended that a working group should be set up to implement the recommendation. It then went further. It recommended:

“governments … should draw on lessons from behavioural economics to present information and choices in ways that allow consumers to access, assess and act on them”.

The consumer group peak body, the consumer law regulator and the competition policy review all agree that consumer access to their own data should proceed. What could go wrong? Well the data formatting needs to be agreed in order to make the system useful. The midata approach and similar systems in the US can provide a model, but this needs to be standardised in Australia. In order for the approach to work, a reasonable number of major service provider businesses have to volunteer. In effect, at least the Australian Bankers’ Association and one of Communications Alliance or the Australian Mobile Telecommunications Association need to be on board.

Comments on the Harper report are due on May 26, 2015. Most of the submissions will be public and this will be the first opportunity to see whether the corporations that hold our big data will allow us to use it to make informed choices in a competitive environment.

Perhaps the challenge will be those other elements of non-price stickiness such a account number portability. Mobile number portability is merely an assumption in Australia. Perhaps the same should be true for bank account number portability if consumers are to get their hands on their own big data.

The Conversation is a non-profit + your donation is tax deductible. Help knowledge-based, ethical journalism today.