With so much attention focused on what agreements come out of COP24, protesters should be seizing the initiative to attack the root causes of climate change.
Rigor académico, oficio periodístico
Artículos sobre Paris climate accord
Mostrando 21 - 37 de 37 artículos
The $4 billion that foundations are pledging to spend within five years amounts to less than 1 percent of what businesses and governments spend on global warming every year.
The case for pragmatism, not dogma.
Australia is falling behind on its Paris targets, but we have many options for improvement.
Not the sort of amount you’d want to lose down the back of the sofa.
Another round of UN climate negotiations kicks off in Bonn this month. With a Trump-shaped cloud hanging over the Paris Agreement, what approach can we expect Australia to adopt this time around?
Why is it so hard to reach consensus about how to slow climate change? Multiple time lags get in the way: some make it hard to convey the risk, while others prolong the search for solutions.
US President Donald Trump’s call to renegotiate the Paris Climate Accord is a fresh opportunity to craft a binding and enforceable agreement.
Chief Scientist Alan Finkel has attempted to address the energy ‘trilemma’: electricity that’s cheap, reliable and low-emissions. Has he succeeded? Our expert panel weighs in.
The Finkel review is designed to create a coherent and realistic plan for a low-emissions future. Here are the details you need to know.
India, the world’s fourth-largest carbon emitter, long resisted calls to fight climate change. Now it is investing heavily in clean energy and expects to meet its Paris climate accord target early.
On June 1, Donald Trump announced that he would take the US out of the Paris climate agreement because it was “unfair” to the US. An economic analysis indicates otherwise.
The Paris climate agreement aims to keep global warming to within 2°C above ‘pre-industrial levels’. But what does that mean, exactly?
As the US leaves the Paris accord, how much faith should we put in international treaties? States, cities and local movements are increasingly important players in the fight against climate change.
Coal-fired power plants produce air pollution that kills thousands of Americans every year. President Trump’s embrace of coal energy will delay a shift to cleaner fuels that is saving money and lives.
Economic forces – alongside a moral imperative – are driving cities, states and companies to make changes to forestall climate change, regardless of the whims of the White House.
A panel of academics and scientists explain the damages to the Earth, the economy and US moral standing in the world by Trump’s decision to abandon the Paris climate accord.
Principales colaboradores
-
Professor of Natural Resources & Environment, University of Michigan
-
Director, Center for Global Discovery and Conservation Science and Professor, Arizona State University
-
A.J. Meyer Professor of Energy and Economic Development, Harvard Kennedy School
-
CEO, Climateworks Centre
-
Professor of Public Sector Management, Monash University
-
Senior Lecturer in Climate Science, The University of Melbourne
-
Distinguished Scholar, NCAR; Affiliate Faculty, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau
-
Professor of International Politics, Clinton Institute, University College Dublin
-
Professor of International Relations, University of California, San Diego
-
Professor of Climate Science, University of Reading
-
Visiting Fellow, SPRU, University of Sussex Business School, University of Sussex
-
Honorary Professor of International Relations, University of the Witwatersrand
-
Research Associate (Centre for Energy Economics Research and Policy), Heriot-Watt University
-
Lecturer, Monash University
-
Honorary Associate Professor, Centre for Climate Economics and Policy, Australian National University
