So what environmental factors have enabled Lungi Ngidi, the son of a domestic worker and a caretaker from KwaZulu-Natal, or Vernon Philander from gang-ridden Ravensmead, to develop into elite players? What hinders players from similar environments from making it to the top?
Cricket has been played in all South African communities since the 1890s, but with colonialism and apartheid this experience has been unequal and segregated. Significant social and economic inequalities still remain.
And despite cricket being unified administratively in 1991, only 21 Black African players have represented South Africa across all formats of the game – Test, One Day International and T20 – in the 29 years since.
I set out to gain a better understanding of the barriers and enablers to cricket talent development in the country. I interviewed 43 professional male South African cricketers as well as 16 coaches, administrators and a journalist. They represented all ethnic groups, all cricket disciplines and all regions of the country. Co-researchers verified my findings along with the multiple sources of data.
I found the barriers to entry for black players were high as well as complex in a sport that reflects an unequal society. But much more could be done to achieve transformation and equal access for all.
All the players progressed to the elite level through different routes. These ranged across informal street or garden cricket, organised mini cricket, schools, universities and clubs. Most players – 60% of the sample – achieved success early by being chosen to play for the country’s U19 teams.
The rest played no representative cricket until the senior level and they debuted at the professional level much later. Despite their progress, players identified many barriers and enablers to their success.
Societal factors included:
- The historical and current inequalities and injustices of South African society. This has created a massive divide between ethnic groups in terms of socio-economic status, opportunities and attitudes towards one another. As one participant put it:
You have the haves and the have-nots and we are really struggling to close that gap.
The diverse communities from which the players come each present significant advantages and disadvantages. Social challenges, such as HIV, gangsterism, drug abuse, safety issues and peer pressure all posed considerable challenges for most potential young cricketers. The logistics of having to use unreliable public transport to attend practices also played a role.
The leadership of Cricket South Africa and its provincial unions was found to be ineffective.
After the hype of unification in the 1990s there has been a perceived decrease in commitment to cricket development, a finding supported by a lack of adequate facilities and quality coaches in many communities.
To quote one player:
I think there is no sense of purpose towards transformation within Cricket South Africa, because if they’re serious about wanting to increase representation for ‘Black’ players at a higher level, you have to really be serious about the development of those players.
There was a further sense that there was no accountability, a lack of trust and transparency and the organisation communicated badly with the country’s top players.
Closer to home, the key factors included:
Coaches are seen to be a critical influence, on and off the field, remembered more for their interpersonal skills than their technical ability. Private coaching – or a lack of it – at high school level was identified as a differentiating factor. Congruent coach-player relationships, which take on different features as players progress, should be better understood and encouraged.
Attendance at well-resourced schools with thriving cricket cultures provided players with opportunities to participate, compete and develop the fundamental skills required of an elite cricketer. Of Black African players interviewed, 82% attended ‘former model C’ schools by virtue of earning a cricket-related bursary. But the quality of the schools available to the majority of potential players didn’t provide the same opportunities. Good schooling contributes to the intellectual, emotional, social and cricket intelligences of players on and off the field.
Family members, who have a direct influence on the player, are acknowledged as being indispensable in the development of cricketing talent. Differing economic circumstances, social realities, family structures and cultural beliefs in South African families contributed to limiting the ability of some players to progress. As one participant put it:
There is no support base back home, and I think the successful cricketer must have a support base … Mental stability is crucial and not just life stability.
- Team unity and effectiveness were both found to be lacking in the senior cricket teams. Many players felt the dominant culture limited their playing opportunities and a sense of belonging off the field.
And that did affect my cricket, because no one wants to be in a place where ….you don’t feel welcome and you don’t feel comfortable.
Team effectiveness was also impacted by poor communication between players and management, insufficient leadership skills, and a lack of team members’ understanding of the unique characteristics and circumstances of each player.
How to achieve integration
There are solutions. Cricket South Africa, and all committed stakeholders, could adopt a systems approach that addresses the multi-faceted nature of talent development in cricket. I have developed a framework to do just that. It can be summarised as follows:
Access to opportunities and competition throughout the pathway, accompanied by the all-round development of players’ cricketing expertise from coaches and cricket organisations.
Effective support from parents, where possible, or other significant individuals.
More inclusive team environments.
The adoption of mindsets on the part of everyone involved that embraces the diversity of talented cricketers.