-
2023
Springer, Policing & Firearms: New Perspectives and Insights
-
2022
BMJ Open, Learning from alcohol (policy) reforms in the Northern Territory (LEARNT): protocol for a mixed-methods study examining the impacts of the banned drinker register
-
2022
Crime Prevention & Community Safety, Patron banning policy and practice in Queensland, Australia: key informant perspectives
-
2022
Sexuality Research & Social Policy, Heteronormative assumptions and expectations of sexual violence: language and inclusivity within sexual violence policy in Australian Universities
-
2022
Drug and Alcohol Review, Key informant perspectives on 3 am last drinks legislation in Queensland, Australia
-
2022
International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, A civilianised summary power to exclude: Perceptual deterrence, compliance and legitimacy
-
2022
European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, An Examination of Community Awareness and Understanding of Patron Banning Provisions in Western Australia: Implications for Policy Development and Success
-
2022
Policing & Society, Do patron bans act as a deterrent to future anti-social offending? An analysis of banning and offending data from Victoria, Australia
-
2021
International Journal of Human Rights, Do Police need guns? The nexus between routinely armed police and safety
-
2021
International Criminal Justice Review, Spatial Exclusion, Due Process, and the Civilianization of Punishment in Australia’s Night-time Economy: A Mapping Review of Patron Banning Policy, Practice, and Oversight
-
2021
Springer, Do police need guns? Policing and firearms: past, present and future
-
2021
Journal of Gender Studies, Family violence homicide in Australia: the effect of victim/offender gender on social media commentary
-
2020
Criminal Justice Policy Review, A Unique Power to Punish: An Examination of the Operation, Scrutiny, and Attendant Risks of Licensee Barring Provisions in Victoria, Australia
-
2020
International Criminal Justice Review, Spatial Exclusion, Due Process, and the Civilianization of Punishment in Australia’s Night-time Economy: A Mapping Review of Patron Banning Policy, Practice, and Oversight
-
2020
Violence and Gender, Primed and ready: does arming police increase safety? Preliminary findings
-
2019
International Journal of Crime, Justice & Social Democracy, Invisible powers to punish: licensee barring order provisions in Victoria and South Australia
-
2019
Drug and Alcohol Review, Should Australia's police-imposed public area banning powers be subject to independent oversight and review?
-
2018
SpringerBrief in Criminology, Discretionary police powers to punish: a case study of Victoria’s banning notice provisions
-
2018
Journal of Police & Criminal Psychology, Community awareness of patron banning in Australia: a brief report
-
2018
Criminology & Criminal Justice, The steady proliferation of Australia’s discretionary police-imposed patron banning powers: an unsubstantiated cycle of assertion and presumption
-
2018
Criminal Law Review, An empirical analysis of sentencing outcomes for assault offences in Victoria and the implications for the sentencing methodology
-
2018
Australian Law Journal, Sentencing inconsistencies: a case study
-
2017
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, Upholding whose right? Discretionary police powers to punish, collective 'pre-victimisation and the dilution of individual rights
-
2017
International Journal of Human Rights, The disparity between human rights policy and parliamentary practice in Australia : a Victorian case study
-
2017
Australian Bar Review, Inconsistencies in sentencing of theft offenders in Victoria: implications for the 'instinctive synthesis'
-
2016
Violence & Gender, Mental illness and gun violence: lessons for the United States from Australia and Britain
-
2016
Journal of Criminological Research, Policy & Practice, Victoria’s banning notice provisions: parliamentary, procedural and individual vulnerabilities
-
2014
Australian Journal of Human Rights, ‘Is a 24-hour ban such a bad thing?’ Police-imposed banning notices: compatible with human rights or a diminution of due process?