What counts as fast for a court is slow for the rest of the world, and judges can give contradictory or vague rulings that delay final decisions into the future.
Academic rigor, journalistic flair
Articles on Federal courts
Displaying all articles
The retired judge says the judiciary doesn’t ‘do justice’ but follows the law and the facts, which doesn’t always mean a sympathetic or compassionate ending.
A retired federal judge sheds light on what’s going on in Judge Lewis Kaplan’s courtroom during the latest trial involving former President Donald Trump.
The majority of Americans support TV coverage of former President Donald Trump’s trial on charges he attempted to overturn the 2020 election.
A number of judges who considered challenges to anti-LGBTQ legislation passed by state lawmakers in 2023 had strong words for how the laws violated the First Amendment.
Many people wonder how courts can rule in contradictory ways. But it happens relatively frequently.
Local governments in Oklahoma are adapting to a 2020 Supreme Court ruling, but state officials have chosen a different path.
A handful of Black women have worn the black robes of a judge in the past, but none has ever been nominated to the U.S. Supreme Court. Until now.
In the 1860’s, the Supreme Court was a ‘partisan creature’ and President Lincoln and the Republican Party remade it so that it reflected the party’s priorities.
Top contributors
-
President, Dickinson College
-
Professor of History, Arizona State University
-
Professor of Law, University of Virginia
-
Professor of Law and Adjunct Professor of Political Science, Wayne State University
-
Professor of Law, George Washington University
-
Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Wayne State University
-
Sharon D. Wright Austin is a Friend of The Conversation.
Professor of Political Science, University of Florida
-
Director of the Brechner Freedom of Information Project, College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida
