Meaningful insurance coverage, access to health care and costs were problems before King v Burwell and are still problems today.
Academic rigor, journalistic flair
Articles on King v Burwell
Displaying all articles
Law professors were vocal in explaining how the different parts of the ACA worked together. It looks like the court was paying attention.
The Supreme Court has upheld health insurance subsidies for states using the federal marketplace. Experts weigh in on what the decision means.
Justice Scalia once again failed to win over either Justice Kennedy or Chief Justice Roberts, revealing he is losing the war over the Supreme Court’s heart.
If the Supreme Court ends subsidies for the federal exchange, affected states could just establish their own exchanges, right? It’s a little more complicated than that.
In the oral argument in King v Burwell, the justices displayed a much more sophisticated understanding of the Affordable Care Act.
Top contributors
-
Associate Professor of Law, Washington University in St. Louis
-
Associate Professor of Law & Public Health and Director, Veterans Advocacy Clinic, West Virginia University
-
Associate Professor of Social Sciences, Boston University
-
Professor of Law, Drake University
-
Assistant Professor of Law, Georgia State University
-
Dean and Professor of Law, Emory University
-
Assistant Professor of Health Policy and Management, Boston University
