Hillary Clinton’s health care plan includes a public option and lowering the age limit for Medicare. Both would be hard to get through Congress.
Academic rigour, journalistic flair
Articles on Affordable Care Act (ACA)
Displaying 141 - 160 of 169 articles
Donald Trump wants to repeal the Affordable Care Act and allow insurers in one state to sell in another. Do his ideas hold up?
A key goal of the Affordable Care Act was to lower health care costs, but first we have to help individuals make better choices.
The absence of comprehensive dental care exacts a toll on millions of Americans in terms of poor health, pain and the social stigma associated with bad teeth.
Democratic candidates support access to contraception, while candidates from the Republican Party favor policies that could severely restrict access to contraception.
The leading GOP candidates all claim one of their top priorities will be to repeal Obamacare. An architect of the original law outlines the thorny – but plausible – path to repeal.
The long-serving justice changed how judges talk about statutes, but not, argues one law professor, how they ultimately interpret them.
Price in health care is a squishy concept. Different words relating to cost – charge, price and out-of-pocket cost – all have different meanings.
An examination of orthopedic surgery and knee replacement showed that higher payments were associated with markets dominated by a few large physician groups.
It looks like where you live, and what regulations that state has for health insurers, may have a major impact on whether you are diagnosed early or not.
Picking a plan that provides the coverage you need at a price you can afford is tough. It’s even harder when you don’t have a great understanding of the language that insurers use to describe plans.
Meaningful insurance coverage, access to health care and costs were problems before King v Burwell and are still problems today.
Law professors were vocal in explaining how the different parts of the ACA worked together. It looks like the court was paying attention.
The Supreme Court has upheld health insurance subsidies for states using the federal marketplace. Experts weigh in on what the decision means.
Justice Scalia once again failed to win over either Justice Kennedy or Chief Justice Roberts, revealing he is losing the war over the Supreme Court’s heart.
If the Supreme Court ends subsidies for the federal exchange, affected states could just establish their own exchanges, right? It’s a little more complicated than that.
Supporting a decision that leaves six million people without coverage and raises premiums for others could further the image of the Republican Party as an uncaring party of the wealthy.
The Affordable Care Act was the most significant health care reform since Medicare. Have concerns that it would hurt businesses panned out?
Choosing health insurance that provides the amount of coverage you’ll likely need at the right cost is a difficult task, especially if it’s your first time picking a plan.
In the oral argument in King v Burwell, the justices displayed a much more sophisticated understanding of the Affordable Care Act.
Top contributors
-
Associate Professor of Public Health, Texas A&M University
-
Professor of Health Finance, Weatherhead School of Management & School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University
-
Quintiles Professor of Pharmaceutical Development and Regulatory Innovation, Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California
-
Assistant Professor of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University
-
Associate Professor of Health Law, West Virginia University
-
Associate Professor of Law, University of Tennessee
-
The Lee and Brena Freeman Professor at the University of Chicago Law School and Professor at the Pritzker School of Medicine., University of Chicago
-
Research Assistant Professor of Social, Behavioral and Population Sciences, Tulane University
-
Associate Professor of Law, Washington University in St. Louis
-
Professor of Public Health Practice, Harvard University
-
Professor of Legal Studies and Political Science, UMass Amherst
-
Assistant Professor of Economics, University of California, Merced
-
Political Scientist Postdoctoral Scholar in Health Policy and Management, University of California, Los Angeles
-
Director of Center for Health Services Reseach, Associate Professor, Georgia State University
-
Dean and Professor of Law, Emory University
