It’s highly unusual for a journalist to pursue someone he thinks has been involved in foul play by publishing a popular podcast. But the trial verdict will give Hedley Thomas enormous gratification.
Grand juries are meeting in Georgia and Washington, D.C., as part of investigations into attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. How do they work?
White supremacist groups seek to solidify their control over the US by changing the government, sometimes by violence.
Criminal libel and seditious libel laws have existed under both military and constitutional rule in Ghana.
The underlying behaviour in the former doctor’s near-poisoning of his partner is more common than might be assumed.
Unlike other professions dealing with human trauma, criminal lawyers are very rarely offered psychological support. New research aims to learn how best to improve this.
People who forge their own vaccine cards, or buy forged cards, are already facing legal problems, including criminal charges.
While guilty people are more receptive to plea offers, innocent defendants can also see pleading guilty as an attractive option.
Critics say only links to real or threatened violence should justify the proposed criminalisation of hate speech. But New Zealand law already regulates all kinds of non-violent speech.
The lawsuit resembles earlier legal efforts to make tobacco companies remedy wrongdoing.
Free speech is a long American tradition – but so are attempts to restrict free speech. A First Amendment scholar writes about measures a century ago to silence those criticizing government.
If storing DNA for criminal investigations helps identity the perpetrators and eliminate the innocent, why don’t we include samples from everyone?
Removing a condom without consent during sex has been recognised as rape by a New Zealand court. Other jurisdictions could follow suit.
Scholars of policing, law, race and Minnesota history explain the landmark guilty verdicts handed down in the trial for the murder of George Floyd.
Even though a House majority voted to impeach, President Trump, the process will likely not be finished before he’s left office. A philosopher argues why the impeachment is an important moral action.
The most commonly used justification for capital punishment is not actually supported by evidence.
The death of Phillip Mbuji Johansen highlights how courts fail to consider entrenched racial biases when they assess what amounts to ‘intent’.
Evidence suggests that the defence of extreme intoxication isn’t rarely used, and is often successful in cases involving male violence against women.
The first of a series of fatal flaws in the idea is about where to draw the line.
The use of incitement around protests poses new and complex legal questions.