We ought to want student essays to reflect understanding, judgment and caring, something beyond ChatGPT.
Academic rigor, journalistic flair
Articles on Cheating
Displaying 1 - 20 of 51 articles
Educators need to carefully consider ChatGPT and issues of academic integrity to move toward an assessment system that leverages AI tools.
Psychopaths have thrived for so long because of their deceptive powers.
Research suggests the only way to effectively combat online cheating for now is holding exams in person.
You need an AI and lots of data to work out whether there’s any foul play in a chess game.
People who have a strong sense of fairness are less likely to cheat.
An estimated one in ten Australian tertiary students have paid a so-called contract cheating service to do their work for them. What most don’t think about is the risk of being blackmailed later.
Tsitsipas’s reputation for taking strategic breaks is so well established that Murray planned for such disruptions.
Australia has a law against businesses offering assignments for sale to students, but that hasn’t stopped ‘contract cheating’. And new research shows it’s much more common than had been thought.
Both men and women play a role in perpetuating attitudes toward sex that are hypocritical and logically inconsistent.
Why do men identify as straight if they have sex with other men? And why would a straight man have sex with another man in the first place?
In order to keep students honest, research suggests that educators should focus on what’s driving them to learn in the first place.
Equity and privacy problems with online proctoring reflect a larger issue: Students look to universities to set an example of integrity.
As people file their taxes in a year where many are going through financial hardships brought on by COVID-19, a scholar argues that cheating on one’s taxes would still be morally wrong.
Why do even the rich cheat on their taxes? Roesearch suggests some people may be genetically predisposed to break the rules for their own financial gain.
What is cheating? Sometimes, teachers and academics disagree on exactly what constitutes academic misconduct, but getting someone to proofread your work is generally considered fine.
Australian cricket was rocked by a cheating scandal in March. But this month it has shown us what a gracious game it can be – and our political leaders could learn from the captain’s example.
Authentic assessment is perceived as being harder to outsource, and has been adopted by many Australian university teachers. But that doesn’t mean students won’t still cheat on them.
While revered as heroes by their fans, Australia’s cricketers have played hard – too hard – for too long, and now the sport must begin the difficult task of self-reflection and change.
Online students tend to be older, which might explain why new data suggest they’re less likely to cheat. But even with these data, the evidence is mixed.
Top contributors
-
Thomas Lancaster, Imperial College London
-
Senior Lecturer in Sports Ethics and Integrity, Swansea University
-
A.C. Reid Professor of Philosophy, Wake Forest University
-
Associate Professor and Associate Director, Centre for Research in Assessment and Digital Learning, Deakin University
-
Emeritus Professor of International Law, Western Sydney University
-
Senior Lecturer in Communication, Deakin University
-
Senior Lecturer in Applied Psychology, The University of Western Australia
-
Senior Lecturer of Pedagogy and Sports Studies, University of Sydney
-
Pro vice-chancellor (Education and Quality), Swinburne University of Technology
-
Head Of Department in Department of Sport & Event Management, Bournemouth University
-
Professor in Robotics, Queensland University of Technology
-
Associate Professor in Marine Fisheries Ecology, Macquarie University
-
Senior Lecturer in Sports Psychology and Coaching Sciences, Bournemouth University
-
Professor of Computer Science and Provost/CEO/PVC, University of Nottingham
-
Professor of Molecular Evolution, Macquarie University
