The Supreme Court’s decision has major implications for the criminal prosecution of Trump and for the country and how it is governed.
Academic rigor, journalistic flair
Articles on Chief Justice John Roberts
Displaying 1 - 20 of 35 articles
The secret recordings of two Supreme Court justices reveal dramatic differences in how they see American political life.
Are concerns about Supreme Court justices’ ethics an old problem, a new one, political gamesmanship, or something more serious? Yes to all of it.
These cases have asked the justices to consider how to apply some of the most sweeping constitutional protections – those of free speech – to an extremely complex online communication environment.
A retired federal judge examines the oral arguments the Supreme Court heard on a case in which Colorado has blocked former President Donald Trump from the ballot.
The ‘most divided’ Supreme Court ever may have been in 1941, when seven of the nine justices were New Deal supporters appointed by the same president, Franklin D. Roosevelt.
Since 2020, Alabama lawmakers have failed to draw political districts that give Black voters an equal chance of selecting political candidates that represent their interests.
The majority of Americans support TV coverage of former President Donald Trump’s trial on charges he attempted to overturn the 2020 election.
Two Supreme Court rulings on the use of race appear at odds with each other. Blame Chief Justice Roberts’s ambivalence on race, a constitutional law scholar writes.
Affirmative action, discrimination against LGBTQ people and election laws are some of the hot-button issues that the Supreme Court will tackle this fall.
There’s some confusion around what the new climate law allows the Environmental Protection Agency to do. A law professor explains what’s changing.
In the last decision of the term, the Supreme Court cleared a barrier for the Biden administration to end a Trump-era policy returning asylum seekers arriving in the US to camps in Mexico.
The justices who decided to overturn the abortion rights precedent of Roe v. Wade explained their reasoning, and signaled other precedents could be reversed as well.
In a 6-3 conservative majority, the more important divisions may be among the six Republican-appointed justices.
Conflicts of interest at the Supreme Court are nothing new. But no one has found a way to fix them.
Justices declined GOP requests to block court-approved congressional maps in North Carolina and Pennsylvania. But justices punted a bigger question over the role of courts until after the midterm elections.
There is value in observing legal precedent, but sometimes circumstances, logic or judges’ views determine it’s time to overturn it.
A review of some cases offers a window into why very few civil sexual harassment claims make it to trial.
The US Supreme Court is often less insulated from partisan politics than many Americans assume.
President Trump’s populist control of his party didn’t extend to control in courtrooms where he challenged election results. That’s where the rules of politics met the rules of law, and politics lost.
Top contributors
-
Dean of Economics, Politics & History, The University of Austin
-
Professor of Law, University of Richmond
-
Professor of Political Science, Hamline University
-
Distinguished Professor and John F. Kimberling Professor of Law, Maurer School of Law, Indiana University
-
Regents and Distinguished Professor of Environmental and Occupational Health, Texas A&M University
-
Director of the Brechner Freedom of Information Project, College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida
-
Williams Memorial Professor of Law, Northwestern University
-
Associate Professor of Political Science, Rochester Institute of Technology
-
President, Dickinson College
-
Professor of Political Science, LaGrange College
-
William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science, Amherst College
-
Professor of Political Science, Anthropology, Public Policy and Law, USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences
-
Professor of Law, University of Dayton
-
John Rennie Short is a Friend of The Conversation.
Professor Emeritus of Public Policy, University of Maryland, Baltimore County
-
Professor of Law, Texas A&M University
