A Scottish pilot will see rape trials conducted without juries in what could set a dangerous precedent.
In the end, we must accept there are flaws in jury processes. But finding alternatives has proved difficult, hence the reluctance of governments to abandon the status quo.
Artman96 / Shutterstock
You be the judge: just how wacky can jury decisions be?
Ghislaine Maxwell now faces the prospect of years behind bars.
Elizabeth Williams via AP
After five days of deliberations, a jury found Ghislaine Maxwell guilty of five counts relating to the sexual abuse of girls.
Murderers who will face maximum sentence of life in prison.
Experts help explain the context around the murder trial and convictions of Greg McMichael, Travis McMichael and William Bryan.
A demonstration outside the Hennepin County Government Center in Minneapolis on March 29, 2021, the day Derek Chauvin’s trial began on charges he murdered George Floyd.
Stephen Maturen/Getty Images
There’s a divergence in how a trial is conducted, what rules govern it – and the larger issue of racial justice. That divergence affects the legitimacy of any verdict.
How might a house that comes on the market today affect what you think of this one?
fstop123/E+ via Getty Images
Cognitive scientists are investigating the ways relative factors like new options and the order they’re presented influence your choices and beliefs.
Victoria and the ACT just joined other states in implementing judge-alone trials during the pandemic. Such a significant change deserves much more public scrutiny than it has received.
The appeal may lead to a loss of public confidence in the jury system, but that’s how the justice process works.
You wouldn’t think Bob Marley ‘shot the sheriff,’ but rappers are held to a double standard.
When prosecutors introduce lyrics, they’re asking juries to suspend the distinction between author and narrator, reality and fiction, and to read them as literal confessions of guilt.
To address low conviction rates in child sex abuse cases, reforms were made to allow juries to hear about the past sex crimes of defendants. Not all lawyers agree the changes are good.
We can’t stop jurors accessing the internet, but we can educate them and encourage self-regulation.
Does a fair trial exist in the social media age? The Tasmanian Law Reform Institute has released recommendations around juries and their smart devices.
The jury at the Weinstein trial will have to check their biases about consent.
As the Harvey Weinstein trials start, a psychology scholar explains why jurors may be biased on the question of consent. While the situations examined in these studies are not equivalent to sexual assault, they illustrate a pervasive psychological bias.
People who oppose the death penalty cannot serve on juries in those cases.
Crazy City Lady/Shutterstock.com
Should all-white juries be permitted in death penalty cases involving black defendants?
In many places across the US, law prohibits people with felony convictions to serve on juries. Research puts the thinking behind these laws to the test.
‘Say it for the tape.’
Most people on juries assume suspects only confess when they are guilty, and the consequences can be disastrous.
Debbie Baptiste, the mother of Colten Boushie, enters the Court of Queen’s Bench as the jury is in deliberation in the trial of Gerald Stanley, the farmer accused of killing her 22-year-old son, in Battleford, Sask., Friday, February 9, 2018.
(THE CANADIAN PRESS/Liam Richards)
Racial bias likely played a role in the Gerald Stanley case. This article explains how racial dynamics and process failures enabled systemic racism to play a part in Stanley’s acquittal.
Gerald Stanley enters the courthouse in Battleford, Sask., in February 2018 during his trial in the death of Colten Boushie, an Indigenous man. The use by Stanley’s defence team of peremptory challenges produced an all-white jury in his trial.
THE CANADIAN PRESS/Liam Richards
The Canadian government’s criminal justice bill would abolish what are known as peremptory challenges. Here’s why that’s long overdue.
The principle argument as to why women should remove the niqab in court seems compelling, but it is based on flawed assumptions.
Courtroom decisions are more like a game of chance than you may think.
Cropped from aerust/flickr
We live in a probabilistic world. The courts need to catch up – and start training juries in statistics.