Arguments in a case that could fundamentally alter a woman’s right to abortion were heard at the Supreme Court. Justices’ questions suggest that Roe v. Wade is on shaky ground.
Academic rigor, journalistic flair
Articles on Law
Displaying 41 - 60 of 619 articles
Experts help explain the context around the murder trial and convictions of Greg McMichael, Travis McMichael and William Bryan.
Critics of new terrorism laws argue they do not necessarily eradicate hate-fuelled violence — and they could make structural and institutional violence seem more palatable.
Donald Trump asked former aides not to testify before a committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection. The Department of Justice has now charged one over that refusal.
As the Law Society recently reported, legal aid in New Zealand is ‘on life support’. Urgent action is required to avoid the justice gap becoming a chasm.
In general, intoxication is not a defence against criminal charges. There are, however, a few circumstances under which intoxication can be used as a defence.
The Supreme Court ruled in 2008 that you have a constitutional right to have a gun in your home. Now, the justices will consider how far outside of the home that right extends.
Journalists and whistleblowers are being targeted by expensive lawsuits to stop them working.
Despite a historically diverse high court, its voting rules often fail to include minority viewpoints. That could be avoided if justices decided their cases by unanimous vote.
Mistakes at the hands of health care providers are a major cause of death in the US. And many of the blunders are a byproduct of the system.
A scholar who has visited Guantanamo 11 times to observe legal proceedings in the 9/11 terrorism case explains why the conflict continues to delay the case going to trial.
There is value in observing legal precedent, but sometimes circumstances, logic or judges’ views determine it’s time to overturn it.
Unlike other professions dealing with human trauma, criminal lawyers are very rarely offered psychological support. New research aims to learn how best to improve this.
The Department of Education is investigating whether state bans on mask requirements in schools discriminate against students with disabilities.
The abortion rights debate has moved on from freedom to choose – it is now about having available options, a bioethicist writes.
Polish-born Holocaust survivor paved the way for atheists to refuse pledge to God in citizenship oath. But discrimination against nonreligious Americans remains.
By paying greater attention to the originally intended application of the Canadian Constitution’s notwithstanding clause, along with the diversity of lawmakers in Canada, there’s a better path forward.
South Africa’s Constitutional Court should offer no apology for its split judgments.
Even famous Supreme Court rulings like Brown v. Board of Education haven’t necessarily pushed US society forward in a linear direction.
Religion was a common theme in some of the cases to come before the nine justices in the recently concluded Supreme Court term. Three experts help explain what is at stake.
Top contributors
-
Professor of Law, University of Waikato
-
Professor emerita, University of Sydney
-
Professor, UNSW Law School, UNSW Sydney
-
Director, Monash Gender and Family Violence Prevention Centre; Professor of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Monash University
-
Associate Professor in Criminal Justice and Criminology, Bond University
-
Associate Professor, School of Law, University of Canberra
-
Emeritus Professor of Law and Criminal Justice, University of South Australia
-
Deputy Dean, School of Law, Deakin University
-
Professor of Law, Auckland University of Technology
-
Professor of Law, University of Waikato
-
Lecturer in Law, University of Adelaide
-
Adjunct Associate Professor, University of New England
-
Professor of Criminology, Australian National University
-
Senior Lecturer, Criminal Law, Nottingham Trent University
-
Professor of Global Legal Studies, Birmingham Law School, University of Birmingham
