Our analysis reveals the participation rate is alarmingly low for some groups of students, such as First Nations kids and students from educationally disadvantaged backgrounds.
An analysis of data from the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) has found the gender gap in maths tests increased where papers contained more multiple choice questions.
Samara, Russia, 2017: students sit the state exam.
Shutterstock
Standardised tests or exams have been in place in a number of educational systems for nearly two centuries. They are rooted in reformers’ desire to regulate schooling and hold educators accountable.
Many reports over the 12 years of NAPLAN’s existence have highlighted a plethora of issues with the test that need to be urgently addressed. And the most recent review is not exception.
Student teachers need to pass a test to put them in the top 30% of Australia’s literacy and numeracy abilities. This test costs more money than some students have and can be discriminatory.
By making funding dependent on school outcomes, the government is intensifying an audit culture that marginalises vulnerable students.
from shutterstock.com
Governments usually measure outcomes by standardised tests, such as NAPLAN. If schools are scrambling to improve their outcomes to gain funding, this can have a detrimental effect on teaching quality.
Creative thinking, learning and play have a valid place in the curriculum, but are difficult to test.
Shutterstock
Literacy and numeracy can be assessed through creative tasks, like creating a drama performance or an electrical circuit, without hindering creativity.
4.5 million young Australians between the ages of nine and 24 have taken NAPLAN tests at some point during their schooling.
Shutterstock
Jen Jackson, Australian Council for Educational Research; Raymond J Adams, Australian Council for Educational Research, and Ross Turner, Australian Council for Educational Research
Standardised tests are a powerful tool for building an evidence base of what works to guide education policy.
For a student who is blind, the obvious test adjustment is providing a braille test if they are proficient in braille.
Shutterstock
Standardised tests restrict how well students with disability can do, which reinforces the idea that there are things they can’t do that children without disability can.
Contrary to some reports, there is no new English language test for international students - the government is simply expanding standards already being met by most providers.
Results from the 2017 NAPLAN results showed very little improvement since the test was introduced 10 years ago.
Richard Wainwright/AAP
NAPLAN is good at measuring some aspects of education, including knowledge difference between demographics, but has not produced a positive effect on student learning outcomes.
After 10 years of minimal breakthroughs, NAPLAN doesn’t seem to be going anywhere but online.
Shutterstock
NAPLAN is great at tracking changes over time and between demographics, but not so great at measuring what factors effect change, engagement or creativity.
To make sure we get the most out of education, we may need to both broaden our narrative about standardised testing and try to minimise its negative influences.
Shutterstock
The use of standardised testing is a divisive topic, and most of the disagreement comes down to beliefs about whether using it to control education is a good or bad thing.
Assessment should be a part of teaching and learning at universities. It’s important because it will subvert exclusion and allow all students to take responsibility for their work.
How can we use data from international tests to improve student learning?
from www.shutterstock.com