Government prosecutors, ruled the Supreme Court, stretched the meaning of a law that’s been used to prosecute those alleged to have participated in the Jan. 6 riot at the US Capitol.
Rigor acadêmico, estilo jornalístico
Todos os artigos de John Roberts
Exibindo todos artigos
Secret recordings raise questions about Justice Alito’s impartiality, but they also reveal the weak state of legal protections against the misuse of the microphones and cameras everyone carries.
In 1974, the Supreme Court accepted, heard and decided a case within two months because the justices understood its importance to the public.
A retired federal judge examines the oral arguments the Supreme Court heard on a case in which Colorado has blocked former President Donald Trump from the ballot.
There was little controversy when President Bill Clinton nominated Stephen Breyer to the bench in 1994. His tenure on the Supreme Court reflects those less partisan times.
If Roe v. Wade is overturned and abortion rights are returned to the states, access to abortion will be a geographical lottery – and the poor and marginalised will suffer.
Support for the Affordable Care Act is at an all-time high.
In cases testing the limits of presidential power, the Supreme Court ruled the president has no special protections that exempt him from complying with subpoenas from Congress or state grand juries.
The Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Roberts has reversed its decadeslong practice of protecting voters’ rights and removing barriers to casting ballots.
President Trump refuses to provide information to lawmakers in the impeachment inquiry. But courts have been reluctant to take such cases for fear of upsetting the government’s balance of power.
Was a friend-of-the-court brief filed with the Supreme Court by five Democratic senators a legal argument – or a political threat?
Conflict made its way to the Supreme Court this past session with two cases – one about the census, the other about gerrymandering. A court scholar says the two cases are intimately connected.
Many states are also eroding a woman’s right to access abortions.
Kavanaugh thinks judges ‘must be an umpire – a neutral and impartial arbiter.’ So does Chief Justice Roberts. But more liberal jurists believe that the application of the law is inherently subjective.
The Trinity Lutheran case signals the Supreme Court’s willingness to interpret separation of church and state as religious discrimination. What will this mean for the future of vouchers and school choice?
Our data-driven model was able to create a reasonably accurate assessment of justices’ views on issues, predict their alignments on cases and identify who might be a swing vote.
Now that Capitol Hill has turned red, the debate has turned to whether this will increase gridlock or not. Certainly from the perspective of the President it will. He can expect vastly more difficulty…
Principais colaboradores
-
William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science, Amherst College
-
Ph.D. student at Discovery Analytics Center, Virginia Tech
-
Ph.D. student at Discovery Analytics Center, Virginia Tech
-
Ph.D. student at Discovery Analytics Center, Virginia Tech
-
Professor of Legal Studies and Political Science, UMass Amherst
-
Senior Lecturer in US History, College of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences, Flinders University
-
Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Judge Ben C. Green Professor of Law, Case Western Reserve University
-
Professor of Law, West Virginia University
-
Dean of Economics, Politics & History, The University of Austin
-
Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of Maryland, Baltimore County
-
Distinguished Fellow in Law and Government, Dickinson Law, Penn State
-
Professor of Law and Adjunct Professor of Political Science, Wayne State University
-
Associate Professor of Law, University of Tennessee
-
Professor of Political Science, Northern Illinois University
-
Professor of History and Provost Emeritus, Binghamton University, State University of New York
