The journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) recently retracted several papers by a leading researcher on food and consumption. What does this mean for the researcher’s findings?
Rigor acadêmico, estilo jornalístico
Todos os artigos de P-hacking
Exibindo todos artigos
Questionable research practices are not fraud, and they’re not cause for panic. But they do give us some hints about how we can make science more robust.
Scientists have a big problem: Many psychological studies don’t hold up to scrutiny. Is it time to redefine statistical significance?
This is the second part in a series on how we edit science, looking at hypothesis testing, the problem of p-hacking and how the peer review process works.
Principais colaboradores
-
Professor of Philosophy, University of Sydney
-
Professor, School of Biosciences & School of Historical and Philosophical Studies, The University of Melbourne
-
Adjunct Professor, Macquarie University
-
Lecturer in Mathematics, Flinders University
-
University Distinguished Professor and Department Head of Statistics, Texas A&M University
-
Postdoctoral Researcher , The University of Melbourne
